Skip to main content
Log in

Efficient Video-on-Demand services over mobile datacast channels

  • Published:
Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The integration of reliable Video-on-Demand (VoD) broadcasting schemes in the DVB-h transmission system is studied, exemplary for Pyramid Broadcasting (PB). Sophisticated VoD broadcasting schemes such as PB allow receivers to tune into the ongoing transmission of a video-stream at arbitrary time, while still being able to receive the multimedia sequence from the beginning to end, after a short initial playout latency. Raptor coding, integrated in the FLUTE protocol, is combined with the traditional PB scheme in order to provide high service and presentation reliability. We give a short overview on the DVB-h transmission system as well as on the FLUTE protocol. We present and discuss options for the integration of VoD broadcasting schemes in combination with Raptor coding. We achieve backward-compatibility even with terminals not supporting Raptor coding. Simulation results show the benefits of the discussed VoD scheme compared to existing carousel approaches in DVB-h.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Engebretsen, L., Sudan, M., 2002. Harmonic Broadcasting is Bandwidth-Optimal Assuming Constant Bit Rate. Proc. Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. San Francisco, CA, USA.

  • ETSI, 2005. IP Datacast over DVB-H: Content Delivery Protocols. ETSI Standard, Draft, V0.0.9.

  • Horn, G.B., Knudsgaard, P., Lassen, S.B., Luby, M., Rasmussen, J.E., 2001. A scalable and reliable paradigm for media on demand. IEEE Computer, 34(9):40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, A., 2001. Video-on-Demand Broadcasting Protocols: A Comprehensive Study. Proc. IEEE Infocom. Anchorage, Alaska.

  • Huang, C., Janakiraman, R., Xu, L., 2004. Loss-Resilient Media Streaming Using Priority Encoding. Proc. ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM’04). New York, USA.

  • Jenkač, H., Stockhammer, T., 2005. Asynchronous Media Streaming over Wireless Broadcast Channels. Proc. of International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME). Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

  • Luby, M., Gemmel, J., Vicisano, L., Rizzo, L., Handley, M., Crowcroft, J., 2002a. Asynchronous Layered Coding (ALC) Protocol Instantiation. RFC 3450, IETF.

  • Luby, M., Gemmel, J., Vicisano, L., Rizzo, L., Handley, M., Crowcroft, J., 2002b. Layered Coding Transport (LCT) Building Block. RFC 3451, IETF.

  • Luby, M., Vicisano, L., Gemmel, J., Handley, M., Crowcroft, J., 2002c. Forward Error Correction (FEC) Building Block. RFC 3452, IETF.

  • Luby, M., Watson, M., Gasiba, T., Stockhammer, T., Xu, W., 2006. Raptor Codes for Reliable Download Delivery in Wireless Broadcast Systems. Proc. Consumer and Communications Networking Conference (CCNC). Las Vegas, NV, USA.

  • Paila, T., Luby, M., Lehtonen, R., Roca, V., Walsh, R., 2004. FLUTE—File Delivery over Unidirectional Transport. RFC 3926, IETF.

  • Peltotalo, J., Peltotalo, S., Harju, J., 2005. Analysis of the FLUTE Data Carousel. Proc. 10th EUNICE Open European Summer School. Colmenarejo, Spain.

  • Shokrollahi, A., 2003. Raptor Codes. Tech. Rep. DR2003-06-001, Digital Fountain.

  • TM-CBMS1361, 2005. Proposal for Simulations for Evaluation of Application Layer FEC for File Delivery.

  • Xu, L., 2001. Efficient and Scalable on-Demand Data Streaming Using UEP Codes. Proc. ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM’01). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jenkač, H., Stockhammer, T., Xu, W. et al. Efficient Video-on-Demand services over mobile datacast channels. J. Zhejiang Univ. - Sci. A 7, 873–884 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2006.A0873

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2006.A0873

Key words

CLC number

Navigation