Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 204–209 | Cite as

Numerical analysis on car-following traffic flow models with delay time

  • Li Li  (李莉)
  • Shi Peng-fei  (施鹏飞)
Article

Abstract

Effects of the speed relaxation time on the optimal velocity car-following model (OVM) with delay time due to driver reaction time proposed by Bando et al. (1995) were studied by numerical methods. Results showed that the OVM including the delay is not physically sensitive to the speed relaxation times. A modified car-following model is proposed to overcome the deficiency. Analyses of the linear stability of the modified model were conducted. It is shown that coexisting flows appear if the initial homogeneous headway of the traffic flow is between critical values. In addition, phase transitions occur on varying the initially homogeneous headway.

Key words

Car-following models Delay time Relaxation time Phase transitions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bando, M., Hasebe, K., Nakayama, A., Shibata, A., Sugiyama, Y., 1995. Dynamic model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation. Physical Reviews E, 51(2):1035–1042. [doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.51.1035]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bando, M., Hasebe, K., Nakanishi, K., Nakayama, A., 1998. Analysis of optimal velocity model with explicit delay. Physical Reviews E, 58(5):5429–5435. [doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.58.5429]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davis, L.C., 2003. Modifications of the optimal velocity traffic model to include delay due to driver reaction time. Physica A, 319:557–567. [doi:10.1016/S0378-4371(02) 01457-7]CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Helbing, D., Tilch, B., 1998. Generalized force model of traffic dynamics. Physical Review E, 58(1):133–138. [doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.58.133]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jiang, R., Wu, Q.S., 2003. First-and second-phase transitions from free flow to synchronized flow. Physica A, 322:676–684. [doi:10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01802-2]CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Kerner, B.S., Rehborn, H., 1997. Experimental properties of phase transitions in traffic flow. Physical Review E, 79(20):4030–4033.Google Scholar
  7. Nagatani, T., 1998. Thermodynamic theory for the jamming transition in traffic flow. Physical Review E, 58(4):4271–4276. [doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.58.4271]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Treiber, M., Henneche, A., Helbing, D., 2000. Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Physical Review E, 62(2):1805–1823. [doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.62.1805]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Treiber, M., Kesting, A., Helbing, D., 2004. Multi-anti cipative Driving in Microscopic Traffic Models. Eprint arXiv: cond-mat/0404736.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Li Li  (李莉)
    • 1
  • Shi Peng-fei  (施鹏飞)
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Image Processing and Pattem RecognitionShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations