Advertisement

An underwater acoustic direct sequence spread spectrum communication system using dual spread spectrum code

  • Lan-jun Liu
  • Jian-fen Li
  • Lin Zhou
  • Peng Zhai
  • Hao Zhao
  • Jiu-cai Jin
  • Zhi-chao Lv
Article

Abstract

With the goal of achieving high stability and reliability to support underwater point-to-point communications and code division multiple access (CDMA) based underwater networks, a direct sequence spread spectrum based underwater acoustic communication system using dual spread spectrum code is proposed. To solve the contradictions between the information data rate and the accuracy of Doppler estimation, channel estimation, and frame synchronization, a data frame structure based on dual spread spectrum code is designed. A long spread spectrum code is used as the training sequence, which can be used for data frame detection and synchronization, Doppler estimation, and channel estimation. A short spread spectrum code is used to modulate the effective information data. A delay cross-correlation algorithm is used for Doppler estimation, and a correlation algorithm is used for channel estimation. For underwater networking, each user is assigned a different pair of spread spectrum codes. Simulation results show that the system has a good anti-multipath, anti-interference, and anti-Doppler performance, the bit error rate can be smaller than 10−6 when the signal-to-noise ratio is larger than −10 dB, the data rate can be as high as 355 bits/s, and the system can be used in the downlink of CDMA based networks.

Key words

Underwater acoustic communication Direct sequence spread spectrum Doppler estimation and compensation Channel estimation and equalization Gold code Single carrier Code division multiple access 

CLC number

TN92 

References

  1. Chen ZR, Wang JT, Zheng YR, 2017. Frequency-domain turbo equalization with iterative channel estimation for MIMO underwater acoustic communications. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 42(3):711–721.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2016.2600106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chitre M, Potter J, Heng OS, 2004. Underwater acoustic channel characterisation for medium-range shallow water communications. MTS/IEEE Techno-Ocean, p.40–45.  https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2004.1402892 Google Scholar
  3. Cotae P, Yang TC, 2010. A cyclostationary blind Doppler estimation method for underwater acoustic communications using direct-sequence spread spectrum signals. 8th Int Conf on Communications, p.323–326.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCOMM.2010.5509047 Google Scholar
  4. Cotae P, Regmi S, Moskowitz IS, 2014. Non-data aided Doppler shift estimation for underwater acoustic communication. 10th Int Conf on Communications, p.1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICComm.2014.6866734 Google Scholar
  5. Diamant R, Feuer A, Lampe L, 2012. Choosing the right signal: Doppler shift estimation for underwater acoustic signals. Proc 7th ACM Int Conf on Underwater Networks and Systems, p.27.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2398936.2398971 Google Scholar
  6. He CB, Huang JG, Meng QW, et al., 2010. Accurate Doppler factor estimation for multipath underwater acoustic channels. Audio Eng, 34(12):57–59 (in Chinese).  https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-8684.2010.12.014 Google Scholar
  7. He CB, Huang JG, Yan ZH, et al., 2011. M-ary CDMA multiuser underwater acoustic communication and its experimental results. Sci China Inform Sci, 54(8): 1747–1755.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-011-4202-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. He CB, Huang JG, Zhang QF, 2012. Hybrid time-frequency domain equalization for single-carrier underwater acoustic communications. Proc 7th ACM Int Conf on Underwater Networks and Systems, p.1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2398936.2398953 Google Scholar
  9. Heidari-Bateni G, McGillem CD, 1994. A chaotic direct-sequence spread-spectrum communication system. IEEE Trans Commun, 42(234):1524–1527.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.1994.582834 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang XP, Sang EF, 2007. Design and realization of an underwater acoustic spread-spectrum communication system. Ocean Eng, 25(1):127–132 (in Chinese).  https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-9865.2007.01.020 Google Scholar
  11. Jiao XJ, Zhang L, Xiang HG, 2007. PN based channel estimation in SC-FDE system. Acta Sci Nat Univ Peking, 43(1):103–108 (in Chinese).  https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0479-8023.2007.01.018 Google Scholar
  12. Kumar P, Kumar P, 2015. CI/DS-CDMA scheme for autonomous underwater vehicle communication. IEEE Int Conf on Communication Workshop, p.2501–2506.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCW.2015.7247552 Google Scholar
  13. Liu LJ, Zhang XT, Wang Q, et al., 2009. An underwater acoustic spread-spectrum system using RA coding and band-pass signal acquisition. 5th Int Conf on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, p.1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1109/WICOM.2009.5301418 Google Scholar
  14. Liu LJ, Li JF, Zhou L, et al., 2017. A SC-DS-CDMA underwater acoustic communication system using dual spread spectrum code. IEEE Int Conf on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing, p.1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSPCC.2017.8242518 Google Scholar
  15. Luca MB, Azou S, Burel G, et al., 2005. A complete receiver solution for a chaotic direct-sequence spread spectrum communication system. IEEE Int Symp on Circuits and Systems, p.3813–3816.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS.2005.1465461 Google Scholar
  16. Palmese M, Bertolotto G, Pescetto A, et al., 2007. Spread spectrum modulation for acoustic communication in shallow water channel. OCEANS, p.1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANSE.2007.4302308 Google Scholar
  17. Rojo G, Stojanovic M, 2010. Peak-to-average power ratio reduction for acoustic orthogonal frequency division multiplexing systems. Mar Technol Soc J, 44(4):30–41.  https://doi.org/10.4031/MTSJ.44.4.4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sharif BS, Neasham J, Hinton OR, et al., 2000. A computationally efficient Doppler compensation system for underwater acoustic communications. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 25(1):52–61.  https://doi.org/10.1109/48.820736 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shu XJ, Wang J, Wang HB, et al., 2015. Chaotic direct sequence spread spectrum for secure underwater acoustic communication. Appl Acoust, 104:57–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.10.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shu XJ, Wang HB, Wang J, et al., 2017. A method of multichannel chaotic phase modulation spread spectrum and its application in underwater acoustic communication. Chin J Acoust, 36(1):130–144.Google Scholar
  21. Sozer EM, Proakis JG, Stojanovic R, et al., 1999. Direct sequence spread spectrum based modem for under water acoustic communication and channel measurements. Proc MTS/IEEE Riding the Crest into the 21st Century Conf and Exhibition, p.228–233.  https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.1999.799743 Google Scholar
  22. Stojanovic M, Freitag L, 2007. Multichannel detection for wideband underwater acoustic CDMA communications. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 31(3):685–695.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2006.880389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stojanovic M, Freitag L, 2009. Underwater acoustic communication channels: propagation models and statistical characterization. IEEE Commun Mag, 47(1):84–89.  https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2009.4752682 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sun ZX, Qiao G, Yu Y, 2014. M-ary code shift keying direct sequence spread spectrum with gold sequence using in underwater acoustic communication. Proc Int Conf on Underwater Networks and Systems, p.19.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2671490.2674942 Google Scholar
  25. Tang Z, Zhou F, Zheng WT, 2016. Pulse position modulation spread spectrum underwater acoustic communication system using N-H sequence. IEEE Int Conf on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing, p.1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSPCC.2016.7753727 Google Scholar
  26. Tao J, Zheng YR, Xiao CS, et al., 2008. Time-domain receiver design for MIMO underwater acoustic communications. OCEANS, p.1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2008.5151956 Google Scholar
  27. Yang TC, 2016. Spatially multiplexed CDMA multiuser underwater acoustic communications. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 41(1):217–231.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2015.2412993 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yang TC, Yang WB, 2008. Performance analysis of direct-sequence spread-spectrum underwater acoustic communications with low signal-to-noise-ratio input signals. J Acoust Soc Am, 123(2):842–855.  https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2828053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yin YL, Zhou F, Qiao G, et al., 2014. Burst mode hybrid spread spectrum technology for covert acoustic communication. OCEANS, p.1–8.  https://doi.org/10.23919/OCEANS.2013.6741030 Google Scholar
  30. Yoshizawa S, Tanimoto H, Saito T, 2017. SC-FDE vs OFDM: performance comparison in shallow-sea underwater acoustic communication. Int Symp on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems, p.1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPACS.2016.7824682 Google Scholar
  31. Zhang X, Peng JX, Li GL, 2007. A simple, reliable and robust direct-sequence apread-spectrum (DSSS) underwater acoustic communication receiver based on FSK modulation. J North West Polytech Univ, 25(2):177–180.Google Scholar
  32. Zheng YR, Xiao CS, Yang TC, et al., 2007. Frequency-domain channel estimation and equalization for single carrier underwater acoustic communications. OCEANS, p.1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2007.4449247 Google Scholar
  33. Zheng YR, Wu JX, Xiao CS, 2015. Turbo equalization for single-carrier underwater acoustic communications. IEEE Commun Mag, 53(11):79–87.  https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2015.7321975 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Zhejiang University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EngineeringOcean University of ChinaQingdaoChina
  2. 2.The First Institute of OceanographyState Oceanic AdministrationQingdaoChina
  3. 3.College of Underwater Acoustic EngineeringHarbin Engineering UniversityHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations