Advertisement

Materials and Structures

, 51:32 | Cite as

A microstructural insight into the hygro-mechanical behaviour of a stabilised hypercompacted earth

  • Agostino Walter Bruno
  • Céline Perlot
  • Joao Mendes
  • Domenico Gallipoli
Original Article

Abstract

The use of raw earth as construction material can save embodied and operational energy because of low processing costs and passive regulation of indoor ambient conditions. Raw earth must however be mechanically and/or chemically stabilised to enhance stiffness, strength and water durability. In this work, stiffness and strength are enhanced by compacting raw earth to very high pressures up to 100 MPa while water durability is improved by using alkaline solutions and silicon based admixtures. The effect of these stabilisation methods on hygro-mechanical behaviour is explored and interpreted in terms of the microstructural features of the material. Stiffness and strength are defined at different humidity levels by unconfined compression tests while the moisture buffering capacity is measured by humidification/desiccation cycles as prescribed by the norm ISO 24353 (Hygrothermal performance of building materials and products determination of moisture adsorption/desorption properties in response to humidity variation. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2008). As for the microstructural characterisation, different tests (i.e. X-ray diffractometry, Infrared Spectroscopy, Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry, Nitrogen Adsorption) are performed to analyse the effect of stabilisation on material fabric and mineralogy. Results indicate that the use of alkaline activators and silicon based admixtures significantly improves water durability while preserving good mechanical and moisture buffering properties. Similarly, the compaction to very high pressures results in high levels of stiffness and strength, which are comparable to those of standard masonry bricks. This macroscopic behaviour is then linked to the microscopic observations to clarify the mechanisms through which stabilisation affects the properties of raw earth at different scales.

Keywords

Rammed earth Porosimetry Earth stabilisation Passive air conditioning Moisture buffering Mechanical behaviour 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The financial contribution of the “Conseil regional d’Aquitaine”, the “Agglomération Côte Basque Adour” through the project MECAD “Matériaux Eco-renforcés pour la Construction et l’Aménagement Durable” (dossier no. 20131101001) is gratefully acknowledged. The “Laboratoire Matériaux et Durabilité des Constructions” (LMDC, Toulouse) is also acknowledged for allowing the authors to perform Infrared Spectroscopy tests.

Funding

This study was funded by the “Conseil régional d’Aquitaine” and the “Agglomération Côte Basque Adour” through the project MECAD “Matériaux Eco-renforcés pour la Construction et l’Aménagement Durable” (dossier n. 20131101001).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    ISO 24353 (2008) Hygrothermal performance of building materials and products determination of moisture adsorption/desorption properties in response to humidity variation. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deboucha S, Hashim R (2011) A review on bricks and stabilized compressed earth blocks. Scientific Research and Essays 6(3):499–506Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morel JC, Mesbah A, Oggero M, Walker P (2001) Building houses with local materials: means to drastically reduce the environmental impact of construction. Build Environ 36(10):1119–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Allinson D, Hall M (2010) Hygrothermal analysis of a stabilised rammed earth test building in the UK. Energy Build 42(6):845–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gallipoli D, Bruno AW, Perlot C, Mendes J (2017) A geotechnical perspective of raw earth building. Acta Geotech 12:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pacheco-Torgal F, Jalali S (2012) Earth construction: lessons from the past for future eco-efficient construction. Constr Build Mater 29:512–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Soudani L, Fabbri A, Morel JC, Woloszyn M, Chabriac PA, Wong H, Grillet AC (2016) Assessment of the validity of some common assumptions in hygrothermal modeling of earth based materials. Energy Build 116:498–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Soudani L, Woloszyn M, Fabbri A, Morel JC, Grillet AC (2017) Energy evaluation of rammed earth walls using long term in situ measurements. Sol Energy 141:70–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Easton D (2007) The rammed earth house. Chelsea Green Publishing, HartfordGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liuzzi S, Hall MR, Stefanizzi P, Casey SP (2013) Hygrothermal behaviour and relative humidity buffering of unfired and hydrated lime-stabilised clay composites in a Mediterranean climate. Build Environ 61:82–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McGregor F, Heath A, Fodde E, Shea A (2014) Conditions affecting the moisture buffering measurement performed on compressed earth blocks. Build Environ 75:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Attom MF (1997) The effect of compactive energy level on some soil properties. Appl Clay Sci 12(1):61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kouakou CH, Morel JC (2009) Strength and elasto-plastic properties of non-industrial building materials manufactured with clay as a natural binder. Appl Clay Sci 44(1):27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mesbah A, Morel JC, Olivier M (1999) Clayey soil behaviour under static compaction test. Mater Struct 32(223):687–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Olivier M, Mesbah A (1986) Le matériau terre: Essai de compactage statique pour la fabrication de briques de terre compressées. Bull. Liaison Lab. Ponts et Chaussées 146:37–43Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Venkatarama Reddy BV, Jagadish KS (1993) The static compaction of soils. Geotechnique 43(2)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Crooks RW, Kilgour CL, Winslow DN (1986) Pore structure and durability of bricks. In: Proceedings of 4th Canadian masonry symposium (2nd edn.), 1 Department of Civil Engineering, The University of New Brunswick, Fredericton NB, Canada (2–4 June 1986), pp 314–323Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haynes JM, Sneck T (1972) Pore properties in the evaluation of material. In: Performance concept in buildings. Proceedings of a joint symposium held in Philadelphia, May 2–5, 1972. National bureau of standards, pp 669–675Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maage M (1984) Frost resistance and pore size distribution in bricks. Matériaux et Construction 17(5):345–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Robinson GC (1984) The relationship between pore structure and durability of brick. Am Ceram Soc Bull 63(2):295–300Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Winslow D (1991) Predicting the durability of paving bricks. J Test Eval 19(1):29–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Winslow DN, Kilgour CL, Crooks RW (1988) Predicting the durability of bricks. J Test Eval 16(6):527–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bahar R, Benazzoug M, Kenai S (2004) Performance of compacted cement-stabilised soil. Cement Concr Compos 26(7):811–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guettala A, Abibsi A, Houari H (2006) Durability study of stabilized earth concrete under both laboratory and climatic conditions exposure. Constr Build Mater 20(3):119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jayasinghe C, Kamaladasa N (2007) Compressive strength characteristics of cement stabilized rammed earth walls. Constr Build Mater 21(11):1971–1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Khadka B, Shakya M (2016) Comparative compressive strength of stabilized and un-stabilized rammed earth. Mater Struct 49(9):3945–3955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Miqueleiz L, Ramírez F, Seco A, Nidzam RM, Kinuthia JM, Tair AA, Garcia R (2012) The use of stabilised Spanish clay soil for sustainable construction materials. Eng Geol 133:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nagaraj HB, Sravan MV, Arun TG, Jagadish KS (2014) Role of lime with cement in long-term strength of compressed stabilized earth blocks. Int J Sustain Built Environ 3(1):54–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Venkatarama Reddy BV, Suresh V, Nanjunda Rao KS (2016) Characteristic compressive strength of cement-stabilized rammed earth. J Mater Civil Eng 29:04016203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Walker P, Stace T (1997) Properties of some cement stabilised compressed earth blocks and mortars. Mater Struct 30(9):545–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Diamond S, Kinter EB (1966) Adsorption of calcium hydroxide by montmorillonite and kaolinite. J Colloid Interface Sci 22(3):240–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bell FG (1996) Lime stabilization of clay minerals and soils. Eng Geol 42(4):223–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Davidovits J (ed) (2005) Geopolymer, green chemistry and sustainable development solutions: proceedings of the world congress geopolymer 2005. Geopolymer InstituteGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Palomo A, Grutzeck MW, Blanco MT (1999) Alkali-activated fly ashes: a cement for the future. Cem Concr Res 29(8):1323–1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kebao R, Kagi D, Building Protection TD (2012) Integral admixtures and surface treatments for modern earth buildings. In Modern earth buildings: materials, engineering, constructions and applications, p 256Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Little B, Morton T (2001) Building with earth in Scotland: innovative design and sustainability. Scottish Executive Central Research Unit, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cheng MY, Saiyouri N (2015) Effect of long-term aggressive environments on the porosity and permeability of granular materials reinforced by nanosilica and sodium silicate. Geotech Eng 46(3):62–72Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Elert K, Pardo ES, Rodriguez-Navarro C (2015) Alkaline activation as an alternative method for the consolidation of earthen architecture. J Cult Herit 16(4):461–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Slaty F, Khoury H, Rahier H, Wastiels J (2015) Durability of alkali activated cement produced from kaolinitic clay. Appl Clay Sci 104:229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    MOPT (1992) Bases Para el Diseño y Construcción con Tapial. Madrid, Spain: Centro de Publicaciones, Secretaría General Técnica, Ministerio de Obras Públicas y TransportesGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    CRATerre-EAG (1998) CDI, compressed earth blocks: standards—technology series no. 11. CDI, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    AFNOR (2001) XP P13-901; Compressed earth blocks for walls and partitions: definitions—Specifications—Test methods—Delivery acceptance conditionsGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jaquin PA, Augarde CE, Legrand L (2008) Unsaturated characteristics of rammed earth. In: First European conference on unsaturated soils, Durham, England, pp 417–422Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Beckett CTS, Augarde CE (2012) The effect of humidity and temperature on the compressive strength of rammed earth. In: Proceedings of 2nd european conference on unsaturated soils, pp 287–292Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    AFNOR (1993) NF P 94-051; Soils: Investigation and testing—Determination of Atterberg’s limits—Liquid limit test using Casagrande apparatus—Plastic limit test on rolled threadGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    ASTM D2487-11 (2011) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes. Unified Soil Classification System, USCSGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Houben H, Guillaud H (1994) Earth construction: a comprehensive guide. Intermediate Technology Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Skempton AW (1953) The colloidal activity of clays. In: Selected papers on soil mechanics, pp 106–118Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Dierks K, Ziegert C (2002) Neue Untersuchungen zum Materialverhaltenvon Stampflehm. Steingass, P.: Moderner Lehmbau 2002 Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bruno AW (2016) Hygro-mechanical characterisation of hypercompacted earth for building construction. Ph.D. thesisGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bruno AW, Gallipoli D, Perlot C, Mendes J (2017) Effect of stabilisation on mechanical properties, moisture buffering and water durability of hypercompacted earth. Constr Build Mater 149:733–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    DIN 18945 (2013) Earth blocks—terms and definitions, requirements, test methodsGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Barrett EP, Joyner LG, Halenda PP (1951) The determination of pore volume and area distributions in porous substances. I. Computations from nitrogen isotherms. J Am Chem Soc 73(1):373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Tarantino A, De Col E (2008) Compaction behaviour of clay. Géotechnique 58(3):199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Van Jaarsveld JGS, Van Deventer JSJ, Lukey GC (2002) The effect of composition and temperature on the properties of fly ash-and kaolinite-based geopolymers. Chem Eng J 89(1):63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Innocenzi P, Brusatin G (2004) A comparative FTIR study of thermal and photo-polymerization processes in hybrid sol–gel films. J Non Cryst Solids 333(2):137–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ciancio D, Beckett CTS, Carraro JAH (2014) Optimum lime content identification for lime-stabilised rammed earth. Constr Build Mater 53:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bruno AW, Gallipoli D, Perlot C, Mendes J (2017) Mechanical behaviour of hypercompacted earth for building construction. Mater Struct 50(2):160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Gallipoli D, Gens A, Chen G, D’Onza F (2008) Modelling unsaturated soil behaviour during normal consolidation and at critical state. Comput Geotech 35(6):825–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Gelard D, Fontaine L, Maximilien S, Olagnon C, Laurent J, Houben H, Van Damme H (2007) When physics revisit earth construction: Recent advances in the understanding of the cohesion mechanisms of earthen materials. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on earthen structures, vol. 294302. IIS Bangalore, pp 337–341Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Jaquin PA, Augarde CE, Gallipoli D, Toll DG (2009) The strength of unstabilised rammed earth materials. Géotechnique 59(5):487–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    McGregor F, Heath A, Maskell D, Fabbri A, Morel JC (2016) A review on the buffering capacity of earth building materials. In: Proceedings of the Institution of civil engineers—construction materials.  https://doi.org/10.1680/jcoma.15.00035
  63. 63.
    Künzel HM (1995) Simultaneous heat and moisture transport in building components. In: One-and two-dimensional calculation using simple parameters. IRB-Verlag StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rode C, Peuhkuri RH, Mortensen LH, Hansen KK, Time B, Gustavsen A et al (2005) Moisture buffering of building materials. Technical University of Denmark, Department of Civil Engineering, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire SIAME - Bâtiment ISABTP, Fédération IPRA, EA4581Université de Pau et des Pays de l’AdourAngletFrance
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Civil EngineeringNorthumbria UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations