Structural behaviour of prestressed concrete sleepers produced with high performance recycled aggregate concrete
- 496 Downloads
A comparative analysis of the structural behaviour of prestressed concrete sleepers made with high performance concrete (HPC) and high performance recycled aggregate concrete (HPRAC) is presented in this study. Two types of HPRAC sleepers were tested, using 50 and 100% of recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) in replacement of coarse natural aggregates. The RCA employed in this research was sourced from crushing rejected HPC sleepers. The aim of this study was to determine through analysis if the HPRAC sleepers’ behaviour fulfilled the European minimum requirements standards for prestressed concrete sleepers and compare their experimental behaviour with that of the HPC sleepers. The three types of prestressed concrete sleepers were subjected to static load tests at rail-seat and centre section (positive and negative load). In the centre section tests a comparative study between the experimental results and the proposed values of four assessment methods of ultimate capacity was carried out. Dynamic load and fatigue tests were also performed at the rail-seat section. The HPRACs and HPC sleepers met all the structural requirements for prestressed concrete sleepers. The experimental results determined the satisfactory performance of the HPRAC-50 and the HPRAC-100, which was very similar to that of the HPC sleepers. The load–strain behaviour recorded via the use of strain gauges on the prestressing bars revealed slightly higher stiffness of the HPC sleepers. The values obtained from the four assessment methods of ultimate capacity were also accurate when applied to HPRAC.
KeywordsRecycled aggregate concrete High performance concrete Sleeper Structural prestressed concrete Railway sustainability
The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support of The Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Spain) by the INNPACT Project (IPT-2011-1655-370000) and the technical support of DRACE Infrastructuras S. L. and Instituto de Ciencias de la Construcción Eduardo Torroja.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Eurostat (2012) Waste statistics in Europe. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/
- 15.Etxeberria M, Gonzalez-Corominas A, Valero I Application of low-grade recycled aggregates for non-structural concrete production in Barcelona city. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on sustainable construction materials and technologyGoogle Scholar
- 20.Kou S, Poon C, Chan D (2004) Properties of steam cured recycled aggregate fly ash concrete. In: Vázquez E, Hendriks C, Janssen G (eds) International RILEM conference on the use of recycled materials in buildings and structures. RILEM Publications SARL, Barcelona, Spain, pp 590–599Google Scholar
- 27.ACI Committee 363 (1997) State of the art report on high-strength concrete. Farmington HillsGoogle Scholar
- 30.Union of International Railways (2012) Newsletter, high speed rail, fast track to sustainable mobilityGoogle Scholar
- 34.Carpio J, Casado JA, Carrascal I (2004) Influencia en la resistencia a fatiga del tipo de armadura y su anclaje empleado en traviesas monobloque de hormigón pretensado. An. Mecánica la Fract. 21Google Scholar
- 42.Koh T-H, Bae Y-H, Hwang S-K, Sagong M (2012) Dynamic performance of eco-friendly prestressed concrete sleeper. ACI Spec Publ 289:1–18Google Scholar
- 43.Koh T, Han S, Sagong M (2001) Developement of eco-friendly PC sleeper using slag. In: 9th World Congress Railway ResearchGoogle Scholar
- 44.Koh T, Hwang S (2013) Field performance and durability of eco-friendly prestressed concrete sleeper. In: The third international conference on sustainable construction materials and technologiesGoogle Scholar
- 46.European Committee for Standardization (2009) EN 13230-2 Railway applications—Track-Concrete sleepers and bearers Part 2: Prestressed monoblock sleepers. 32Google Scholar
- 47.ADIF (2009) Spanish Technical Specifications of Prestressed Concrete Monoblock Sleepers (ET 03.360.571.8). MadridGoogle Scholar
- 48.Hansen TC (1992) Recycling of demolished concrete and masonry. E&FN Spon, London (UK)Google Scholar
- 52.Fuller WB, Thompson SE (1907) The laws of proportioniong concrete. Trans ASCE 59:67–143Google Scholar
- 53.Neville AM (2000) Properties of concrete, Longman 981-4053-56-2. Pearson Education AsiaGoogle Scholar
- 54.Eurocode 2 (2004) Design of concrete structures, European Committee for Standardization (CEN), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- 55.SIA262 (2003) Concrete structures. Swiss Society of Engineers and Architects (SIA), ZurichGoogle Scholar