Advertisement

Materials and Structures

, 50:48 | Cite as

Analytical prediction of the shear connection capacity in composite steel–concrete trussed beams

  • Piero Colajanni
  • Lidia La Mendola
  • Massimo Latour
  • Alessia Monaco
  • Gianvittorio Rizzano
Original Article

Abstract

Steel–concrete trussed composite beams are a particular types of composite girders constituted by a steel truss embedded in a concrete core. The truss is typically composed by a steel plate or a precast concrete slab working as bottom chord while coupled rebars are generally used to form the upper chord. Moreover, a system of ribbed or smooth steel rebars welded to the plate and forming the diagonals of the truss, works as web reinforcement. In the present study, the attention is focused on the evaluation of the shear resistance of the connection between bottom steel plate (the bottom chord) and concrete core through the diagonal bars of the truss developing a mechanical model able to account for the particular issues arising in this beam typology. In particular, the proposed formulation is based on the extension of existing formulations for the prediction of the resistance of steel dowels to the case of inclined steel bars loaded against concrete, accounting for the following effects: lateral and top confinement, mechanical non-linearity of materials, length of the plastic hinge arising in the steel bar and influence of moment-shear-axial force interaction effect. The accuracy of the model is verified with the available experimental data collected from the technical literature and with FE results obtained from a parametric analysis carried out by the same authors in a previous work.

Keywords

Hybrid steel trussed-concrete beams Shear connection Dowels Headed studs Push-out tests Stress transfer mechanism Theoretical model Finite element model 

References

  1. 1.
    Colajanni P, La Mendola L, Recupero A (2013) Experimental test results vs. analytical prediction of welded joint strength in hybrid steel trussed concrete beams (HSTCBs). Eur J Environ Civ Eng 17(8):742–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tesser L, Scotta S (2013) Flexural and shear capacity of composite steel truss and concrete beams with inferior precast concrete base. Eng Struct 49:135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chisari C, Amadio C (2014) An experimental, numerical and analytical study of hybrid RC-encased steel joist beams subjected to shear. Eng Struct 61:84–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Monaco A (2014) Experimental analysis, numerical and analytical modeling of shear strength mechanisms in Hybrid Steel Trussed Concrete Beams. [Ph.D. thesis] Italy: Department of Civil, Environmental, Aerospatial and Material Engineering, University of PalermoGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ju YK, Kim JY, Kim SD (2007) Experimental evaluation of new concrete encased steel composite beam to steel column joint. J Struct Eng ASCE 133(4):519–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Amadio C, Macorini L, Sorgon S, Suraci S (2011) A novel hybrid system with RC-encased steel joists. EJECE 15(10):1433–1463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hsu HL, Hsieh JC, Juang JL (2004) Seismic performance of steel-encased composite members with strengthening cross-inclined bars. J Constr Steel Res 60:1663–1679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Puhali R, Smotlack I (1980) Relazione sulle prove di push-out atte a determinare le leggi di carico-scorrimento delle travi in sistema composto tipo”REP” (Report on the pushout tests fit for the determination of load–slip laws of REP composite truss beams). Science of Constructions Institute Acts, University of TriesteGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tullini N, Reato P, Cappellozza M (2006) Indagini sperimentali su travi miste acciaio-calcestruzzo con connessione a traliccio (Experimental investigations on hybrid steel–concrete beams with truss connection). In: Proceeding of 16th CTE Congress, Parma, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aiello MA (2008) Analisi sperimentale della connessione acciaio-calcestruzzo nelle travi reticolari miste (Experimental analysis of steel–concrete connection in hybrid truss beams). In: Proceeding of 7th Italian Workshop on Composite Structures, Benevento, Italy, pp. 33–42Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Colajanni P, La Mendola L, Monaco A (2014) Stress transfer mechanisms investigation in hybrid steel trussed–concrete beams by push-out tests. J Constr Steel Res 95:56–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Broms BB (1964) Lateral resistance of piles in cohesive soils. J Soil Mech Found Div 90(2):27–63Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vintzeleou EN, Tassios TP (1986) Mathematical models for dowel action under monotonic and cyclic conditions. Mag Concr Res (London) 38(134):12–22Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Giuriani E, Grisanti A (1988) Comportamento dei Connettori a piolo delle travi miste in acciaio e calcestruzzo. Studi e Ricerche per le costruzioni in C.A., F.lli Pesenti, Politecnico di Milano vol. 8, 1988Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Colajanni P, La Mendola L, Latour M, Monaco A, Rizzano G (2015) FEM analysis of push-out test response of hybrid steel trussed concrete beams (HSTCBs). J Constr Steel Res 111:88–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eurocode 4—design of composite steel and concrete structures—part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings, 2005Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gelfi P, Giuriani E (1987) Modello Teorico del Legame Costitutivo per le Connessioni a Piolo. Corso di Perfezionamento per le Costruzioni in Cemento Armato. Fratelli PesentiGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dulacska H (1972) Dowel action of reinforcement crossing cracks in concrete. ACI J 69:754–757Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Houde J, Mirza MS (1974) A finite element analysis of shear strength of reinforced concrete beams. Shear in reinforced concrete. Detroit, American Concrete Institution, 1974, ACI Special Publication, 42. Vol. I, pp. 103–128Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baumann T, Rusch H (1970) Versuche zum Studium del Verdubelungswirkung der Biegezugbewehrung eines Stahlbetonbalkes. Berlin, Wilhelm Ernst un Sohn, 1970. Deutscher Ausshuss fur Stahlbeton, Heft 210Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Krefeld W, Thurston CW (1966) Contribution of longitudinal steel to shear resistance of reinforced concrete beams. J Am Concr Inst Proc 63(3):325–344Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Soroushian P, Obaseki K, Rojas MC, Sim J (1986) Analysis of dowel bars acting against concrete core. J Proc 83(4):642–649Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Soroushian P (1987) Behavior of bars in dowel action against concrete cover. Struct J 84(2):170–176Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Soroushian P, Obaseki K, Baiyasi MI, El-Sweidan B, Choi KB (1988) Inelastic cyclic behavior of dowel bars. Struct J 85(1):23–29Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Soroushian P, Obaseki K, Rojas MC (1987) Bearing strength and stiffness of concrete under reinforcing bars. ACI Mater J 84(3):179–184Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vintzeleou EN, Tassios TP (1987) Behavior of dowels under cyclic deformations. Struct J 84(1):18–30Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vintzeleou EN, Tassios TP (1990) Eccentric dowels loaded against core of concrete sections. J Struct Eng 16(10):2621–2633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lin Z, Liu Y, He J (2014) Behavior of stud connectors under combined and tension loads. Eng Struct 81:362–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pallares L, Hajjar J (2009) Headed steel stud anchors in composite structures: part I—shear. Universtiy of Illinois, NSEL Report Series, Report No. NSEL-013, April 2009Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    American Institute for Steel Construction (AISC) (2005) Specification for structural steel buildings, ANSI/AISC 360-05, American Institute for Steel Construction, Chicago, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Eurocode 2—Design of concrete structures—Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization (CEN); 2004Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Millard SG, Johnson RP (1984) Shear transfer across cracks in reinforced concrete due to aggregate interlock and to dowel action. Mag Concr Res 36(126):9–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Eurocode 3—EN1993-1-1: Design of steel structures. Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization (CEN) 2005Google Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Piero Colajanni
    • 1
  • Lidia La Mendola
    • 1
  • Massimo Latour
    • 2
  • Alessia Monaco
    • 1
  • Gianvittorio Rizzano
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil, Environmental, Aerospace and Material EngineeringUniversity of PalermoPalermoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of SalernoFiscianoItaly

Personalised recommendations