Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The protection of artistic assets through the base isolation of historical buildings: a novel uplifting technology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper focuses on a novel advanced procedure for the installation of base isolation system (BIS) in historical buildings. The performance objectives of such critical structures and contents are first assessed to set the ground for the reliable evaluation of the response under earthquake ground motions. A number of controversial steps in the evaluation of the seismic demand and possible performance objectives associated to different aspects for a cultural heritage asset are identified and possible solutions proposed. It is shown that BIS is a cost-effective and efficient method that can be employed to protect adequately historical structures and artistic assets. Notwithstanding, the installation of isolation devices in historical structures is not an easy task. A novel advanced procedure based on the construction of two reinforced concrete foundation mats at the base of the existing structure to uplift the sample buildings (e.g. churches, museums, palaces, etc.) is illustrated in the paper. Hydraulic jacks are located along the bearing walls and tend to be as less intrusive as possible. A case study is also investigated both experimentally and numerically; the sample structure consists of a full-scale traditional masonry residential building. Refined yet versatile finite element (FE) models of the sample structures have been implemented and are used to determine the stresses within the foundation mat and superstructure. The FE models were calibrated on in-situ measurements for both structures. Such numerical models were also utilized to perform parametric analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Feilden BM (2003) Conservation of historical buildings, 3rd edn. Architectural Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  2. Look DW, Wong T, Augustus SR (1997) The seismic retrofit of historic buildings – keeping the preservation in the forefront. http://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/briefs/41-seismic-retrofit.htm

  3. Araújo AS, Lourenço PB, Oliveira DV, Leite J (2012) Seismic assessment of St James Church by means of pushover analysis—before and after the New Zealand earthquake. Open Civil Eng J 6(SPEC.ISS.1):160–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lourenço PB, Oliveira DV, Leite JC, Ingham JM, Modena C, da Porto F (2013) Simplified indexes for the seismic assessment of masonry buildings: international database and validation. Eng Fail Anal 34:585–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Manfredi G, Lignola GP, Voto S (2013) Military quarters ‘Caserma Principe Amedeo’ in Nola, Italy: damage assessment and reconstruction of a partially collapsed XVIII century complex. Int J Arch Herit 7(2):225–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. MiBAC_Ministero dei Beni e delle Attività Culturali e del Turismo (2011) Linee Guida per la valutazione e riduzione del rischio sismico del patrimonio culturale allineate alle nuove Norme tecniche per le costruzioni (D.M. 14 gennaio 2008), Rome, Italy (in Italian)

  7. Spencer BF, Nagarajaiah S (2003) State of the art of structural control. J Struct Eng ASCE 129(7):845–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Symans MD, Charney FA, Whittaker AS, Constantinou MC, Kircher CA, Johnson MW, McNamara RJ (2008) Energy dissipation systems for seismic applications: current practice & recent developments. J Struct Eng ASCE 134(1):3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Takewaki I (2009) Building control with passive dampers, optimal performance-based design for earthquakes. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Lagomarsino S, Modaressi H, Pitilakis K, Bosiljkov V, Calderini C, D’Ayala D, Benouar D, Cattari S (2010) PERPETUATE Project: the proposal of a performance-based approach to earthquake protection of cultural heritage. Adv Mater Res 133–134:1119–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Garevski M (1995) Earthquake hazard reduction of historical buildings under seismic isolation. Report No. UCB/EERC 95-04, University of California, USA

  12. Mokha A, Amin N, Constantinou M, Zayas V (1996) Seismic isolation retrofit of large historic building. J Struct Eng 122(3):298–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. De Luca A, Mele E, Molina J, Verzeletti G, Pinto AV (2001) Base isolation for retrofitting historic buildings: evaluation of seismic performance through experimental investigation. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 30(8):1125–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Smirnov V, Eisenberg J, Vasileva A (2004) Seismic isolation of buildings and historical monuments. Recent developments in Russia. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, CD-ROM

  15. Guerreiro L, Craveiro A, Branco M (2006) The use of passive seismic protection in structural rehabilitation. Prog Struct Mater Eng 8(4):121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cuomo G, De Luca A, Mele E (2008) Design aspects in seismic isolation: application to retrofit churches. Int J Arch Herit 2(3):247–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tomazevic M, Klemenc I, Weiss P (2009) Seismic upgrading of old masonry buildings by seismic isolation and CFRP laminates: a shaking table study of reduced scale models. Bull Earthq Eng 7(1):293–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Garevski M (2011) Fixed and base isolation retrofitting of historic masonry buildings. Int J Mater Struct Integr 5(2–3):118–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gilani ASJ, Miyamoto HK (2012). Base isolation retrofit challenges in a historical monumental building in Romania. In Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, Lisbon, CD-ROM

  20. Christopoulos C, Filiatrault A (2006) Principles of passive supplemental damping and seismic isolation. IUSS Press, Pavia

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mezzi, M., Comodini, F., in Rossi, L., (2011). A base isolation option for the full seismic protection of an existing masonry school building. In: Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on civil, structural and environmental engineering computing, Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire

  22. Abbas N, Calderini C, Cattari S, Lagomarsino S, Rossi M, Ginanni Corradini R, Marghella G, Piovanello V, (2010) Classification of the cultural heritage assets, description of the target performances and identification of damage measures, PERPETUATE (EC-FP7 project) Deliverable D4. www.perpetuate.eu

  23. Tassios TP (2009) Seismic protection of monuments. In: Tankut AT et al (eds) Earthquakes and tsunami, geotechnical, geological and earthquake engineering, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  24. Borri A, De Maria A (2011) Un indice per la ricognizione su larga scala della vulnerabilità sismica di beni museali. In: Proceedings of the 14th Italian national conference on earthquake engineering, Bari (in Italian)

  25. Parisi F, Augenti N (2013) Earthquake damages to cultural heritage constructions and simplified assessment of artworks. Eng Fail Anal 34:735–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Eraybar K, Okazaki K, Ilki A (2010) An exploratory study on the perception of seismic risk and mitigation in two districts of Istanbul. Disasters 34(1):71–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Celep Zekai, Erken Ayfer, Taskin Beyza, Ilki Alper (2011) Failures of masonry and concrete buildings during the March 8, 2010 Kovancilar and Palu (Elazig) Earthquakes in Turkey. Eng Fail Anal. doi:10.1016/j.engfai

    Google Scholar 

  28. MiBAC_Ministero per i beni culturali e ambientali. Soprintendenza generale agli interventi post-sismici in Campania e Basilicata. “Dopo la polvere”. Rilevazione degli interventi di recupero (1985–1989) del patrimonio artistico-monumentale danneggiato dal terremoto del 1980–1981. Roma: Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato; 1994 (in Italian)

  29. ASCE/SEI 41/06 (2006) Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  30. CEN European Standard EN 1998-1, 1998, Eurocode 8—“design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings”. European Committee for Standardisation, 2004, Brussels

  31. CEN European Standard EN 1998-3 2005, Eurocode 8—“design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 3: strengthening and repair of buildings” European Committee for Standardisation, 2005, Brussels

  32. DM 14-01-2008 Technical standards for contructions, (in Italian), Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni

  33. Oliveira DV, Silva RA, Garbin E, Lourenĉo PB (2012) Strengthening of three-leaf stone masonry walls: an experimental research. Mater Struct 45(8):1259–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lignola GP, Prota A, Manfredi G (2012) Numerical investigation on the influence of FRP retrofit layout and geometry on the in-plane behavior of masonry walls. J Compos Constr 16(6):712–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ilki A, Demir C, Bedirhanoglu I, Kumbasar N (2009) Seismic Retrofit of brittle and low strength RC columns using fiber reinforced polymer and cementitious composites. Adv Struct Eng 12(3):325–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Di Ludovico M, Prota A, Manfredi G (2010) Structural upgrade using basalt fibers for concrete confinement. J Compos Constr 14(5):541–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Parisi F, Lignola GP, Augenti N, Prota A, Manfredi G (2011) Nonlinear behavior of a masonry sub-assemblage before and after strengthening with inorganic matrix-grid composites. ASCE J Compos Constr 15(5):821–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Valluzzi MR, Oliveira DV, Caratelli A, Castori G, Corradi M, de Felice G, Garbin E, Garcia D, Garmendia L, Grande E, Ianniruberto U, Kwiecień A, Leone M, Lignola GP, Lourenço PB, Malena M, Micelli F, Panizza M, Papanicolaou CG, Prota A, Sacco E, Triantafillou TC, Viskovic A, Zając B, Zuccarino G (2012) Round robin test for composite-to-brick shear bond characterization. Mater Struct 45(12):1761–1791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Parisi F, Lignola GP, Augenti N, Prota A, Manfredi G (2013) Rocking response assessment of in-plane laterally-loaded masonry walls with openings”. Eng Struct 56:1234–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Micelli F, Di Ludovico M, Balsamo A (2014) Mechanical behaviour of FRP-confined masonry by testing of full-scale columns. Mater Struct 47(12):2081–2100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Balsamo A, Iovinella I, Di Ludovico M, Prota A (2014) Masonry reinforcement with IMG composites: experimental investigation. Key Eng Mater 624:275–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Giamundo V, Lignola GP, Maddaloni G, Balsamo A, Prota A, Manfredi G (2015) Experimental investigation of the seismic performances of IMG reinforcement on curved masonry elements. Compos B 70:53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Jain SK, Thakkar SK (2005) Experimental investigation on laminated rubber bearings. Bull Earthq Eng 3:129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Jangid RS (2005) Optimum friction pendulum system for near fault motions. Eng Struct 27(3):349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Jangid RS (2007) Optimum lead-rubber isolation bearings for near fault motions. Eng Struct 29(10):2503–2513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ozbulut OE, Hurlebaus S (2010) Evaluation of the performance of a sliding-type base isolation system with a NiTi shape memory alloy device considering temperature effect. Eng Struct 32(1):238–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Tashkov L, Krstevska L, Gramatikov K, Mazzolani FM (2009) Shake-table test of model of St. Nicholas Church in reduced scale 1/3.5. In: Proceedings, protection of historical buildings, conference prohitech 09, Rome, pp 1691–1697

  48. Tashkov L, Manova K, Krstevska L, Garevski M (2010) Evaluation of efficiency of ALSC floating-sliding base-isolation system based on shake table test and floor response spectra. Bull Earthq Eng 8(4):995–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Soveja L, Budescu M (2015) Analysis and design of a base isolation system for an old church with masonry structure. In: Proceedings of the 13th international symposium “computational civil engineering 2015”, Iasi, pp 45–52

  50. Collina V, Marabello G, Zago R, Zambianchi L (2006) Method of raising a building structure, in particular a building structure subject to flooding. World Intellectual Property Organization. Patent WO/2006/016277

  51. Naeim F, Kelly JM (1999) Design of seismic isolated structures: from theory to practice. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  52. Di Sarno L, Elnashai AS (2005) Innovative strategies for seismic retrofitting of steel and composite structures. J Prog Struct Eng Mater 7(3):115–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. SAP2000 (2013) CSI analysis reference manual. Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  54. Lourenço P, Rots J, Blaauwendraad J (1998) Continuum model for masonry: parameter estimation and validation. J Struct Eng 124(6):642–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Salonikios T, Karakostas C, Lekidis V, Anthoine A (2003) Comparative inelastic pushover analysis of masonry frames. Eng Struct 25(12):1515–1523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Pasticier L, Amadio C, Fragiacomo M (2008) Non-linear seismic analysis and vulnerability evaluation of a masonry building by means of the SAP2000 v. 10 code. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37:467–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Petrovčič S, Kilar V (2013) Seismic failure mode interaction for the equivalent frame modeling of unreinforced masonry structures. Eng Struct 54:9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. D’Ambra C, Lignola GP, Prota A (2016) Multi-scale analysis of in-plane behaviour of tuff masonry. Open Constr Build Technol J (in press)

  59. Collina V, Marabello G, Zago R, Zambianchi L (2007) Method of raising a structure. World Intellectual Property Organization. Patent WO/2007/138427

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the three-year Project PON Research and Competitiveness (2007-2013) 01_02283, Modelling of the seismic isolation for historical buildings, funded by the Italian Ministry of University and Scientific Research. The patent of the uplifting technology is property of CONSTA S.p.a., an Italian Contractor. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the funding agencies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, University of Naples Federico II, Via Claudio 21, 80125, Naples, Italy

    Gian Piero Lignola, Marco Di Ludovico & Andrea Prota

  2. Department of Engineering, University of Sannio, Piazza Roma 21, 82100, Benevento, Italy

    Luigi Di Sarno

Authors
  1. Gian Piero Lignola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luigi Di Sarno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marco Di Ludovico
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrea Prota
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gian Piero Lignola.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lignola, G.P., Di Sarno, L., Di Ludovico, M. et al. The protection of artistic assets through the base isolation of historical buildings: a novel uplifting technology. Mater Struct 49, 4247–4263 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0785-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0785-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation