Materials and Structures

, Volume 49, Issue 9, pp 3569–3577 | Cite as

Strätlingite: compatibility with sulfate and carbonate cement phases

Open Access
Original Article


The silicate AFm, strätlingite, has been shown to be stable in high aluminosilicate cement systems but its stability with respect to the anion content of hydrated Portland cement paste is unknown. The stability of strätlingite in the presence of sulfate and carbonate phases relevant to cement systems are reported. Results show that strätlingite persists at the sulfate activity conditioned by gypsum, ettringite and at carbonate activity conditioned by the presence of calcite, carbonate AFm, or carbonate AFt. Structural incorporation of anions such as carbonate or sulfate in strätlingite was not observed in the temperature range 20–85 °C.


Strätlingite Sulfate Carbonate Stability Compatibility 





Siliceous hydrogarnet


Calcium silicate hydrate










Ettringite (SO4-AFt, C6As3H32)







1 Introduction

It is a common practice to add gypsum to Portland cement [21]. Also, most novel cements such as the calcium aluminosulfate cements contain substantial amounts of sulfate. Cement could also be blended with limestone, mainly CaCO3, and atmospheric CO2 is readily uptaken by wet cements pastes cured in the open. In this way, sulfate and carbonate phases form normally in the hydration process of cement paste. We know that AFm and AFt are common sulfate and carbonate bearing phase product of cement hydration. High saturation in sulfate –rich service environments and elevated temperature may also lead to the formation of gypsum and calcite. The impact of these sulphur and carbon bearing phases on the stability of the crystalline phases occurring in the CaO–Al2O3–SiO2–H2O system is important as reactive supplementary materials are often added with the result that the composition of the reactive fraction of concrete varies over wide limits of composition.

Thermodynamic data has shown that the constitution of minor phases, AFm and AFt is very sensitive to temperature and the activity of anions, especially CO3 2−, SO4 2− and OH, and that the resulting distribution of anions is temperature dependent over short temperature ranges, examples are given in the range 0–40 °C by Matschei and others [4, 13, 14].

Strätlingite has the same basic layer structure as other AFm phases with a positively charged layer, \({\text{Ca}}_{ 2} {\text{Al}}\left( {\text{OH}} \right)_{ 6}^{ + }\) which is charge balanced by an interlayer anion and space filled by a content on neutral water molecules. In strätlingite, the anion is believed to be an aluminosilicate [AlSi(O8H8)·0.25H2O], Fig. 1, after Rinaldi et al. [19]. AFm phases can thus accommodate a wide range of anions in the interlayer amongst which are \({\text{SO}}_{4}^{2 - }\), \({\text{CO}}_{3}^{2 - }\), \({\text{OH}}^{ - }\) , and \({\text{Cl}}^{ - }\). Theoretically, it might be expected that strätlingite will behave like other AFm phases and undergo a range of anion substitutions, but our knowledge in this regard is limited. Data are presented on the phase relation of strätlingite with gypsum, calcite, and the sulfate and carbonate AFm and AFt phases commonly observed in Portland and blended Portland cement compositions.
Fig. 1

Structure of strätlingite: Ca2Al(AlSi)O2(OH)10 ·2.25H2O [19]: (blue balls = Ca; pale blue-green = O, OH; red = Al, Si; small pale yellow ball = H2O). Drawn with ATOMS V6.4.1 [20] using data from Rinaldi et al. [19]. (Color figure online)

2 Experimental

2.1 Analytical methods

Mineralogical examinations of dried solids were by X-ray Powder Diffraction (XRD) using a Bruker D8 Advance X-Ray Powder Diffractometer with CuKα radiation. The angular scan was between 5 and 45°2θ with a step size of 0.02 and count time of 1 s per step. XRD patterns were collected at laboratory temperature of ~20 °C. Infrared spectra of samples were collected by the Attenuated Total Reflection, ATR method with PerkinElmer UATR Spectrometer equipped with a diamond cell. Measurements were collected in the mid-infrared region 400–4000 cm−1 at a resolution of 4 cm−1. The morphology of selected samples was examined with a Hitachi S-520 Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). A voltage of 20 kV was applied across the tungsten filament electron gun. Selected samples where ground to fine powder and a thin layer was collected on the brass sample holder and gold coated with an Emscope SC-500A sputter coater to prevent charging or overheating.

2.2 Sample preparation and reactions

Strätlingite was synthesized according to the protocol reported by [13, 15] from a stoichiometric mixture of CaO, NaAlO2 and Na2SiO3·5H2O.

Ettringite (SO4-AFm), Ca6Al2(SO3)3(OH)12·26H2O: Synthesized according to Matschei et al. [15] and Matschei [13]. A slurry of stoichiometric amounts of NaAlO2, Na2SO4 and CaO (obtained from CaCO3 heated at 1000 °C for ~12 h) in 10 w/v sucrose solution, liquid/solid ~10, was stirred for 3 days and left to age at room temperature 22 °C in HDPE bottle for 4 weeks before filtration. The sample was flushed several times with degassed deionized water. Alternatively, ettringite was prepared from slurry of 1:3 molar ratios of C3A and CaSO4·2H2O in degassed deionized water. The w/s ratio was adjusted to ~20 and the mixture was stirred for 2 weeks at room temperature (20 ± 2 °C).

CO3-AFt, Ca6Al(CO3)3(OH)12·26H2O, was synthesized from a stoichiometric mixture of CaO, NaAlO2 and Na2CO3 in a 10 % w/v sucrose solution according to the modified Carlson and Berman method used elsewhere [13, 15]. Previously prepared slurries of sodium aluminate and sodium carbonate were mixed with 10 % w/v sucrose—CaO mixture, stirred for 3 days and then aged with periodic agitation at room temperature 20 ± 2 °C for 2 weeks before filtration and washing. Matschei [13] has shown that when well washed, the product is sucrose-free.

SO4-AFm, Ca4Al2SO4(OH)12·6H2O, was prepared according to previous protocol [13, 15], by mixing C3A and CaSO4 in a 1:1 molar ratio, slurried in boiling ultra pure water and thereafter cured at 85 °C for two weeks in PTFE bottles prior to filtration.

CO3-AFm, Ca4Al2CO3(OH)12·5H2O, was prepared according to prvious protocol [13, 15], by mixing previously prepared C3A and CaCO3 in a 1:1 molar ratio with previously degassed ultra pure water (w/s ∼10) at 25 °C and stored with agitation in HDPE-bottles for two weeks prior to filtration.

2.2.1 Strätlingite–gypsum phase relations

Single compartment experiment

Mixtures of strätlingite and gypsum CaSO4·2H2O were slurried in degassed deionized water and reacted at 20, 55 and 85 °C for 4 weeks in PTFE bottles with periodic agitation. The mixture was prepared with a target of achieving a 10 % substitution for (OH) i.e. sufficient sulfate to form Ca2Al2SiO2(SO4)0.5(OH)9·2.25H2O. Equivalents of ~2 g/L excess of gypsum were added to the mixtures respectively. After 4 weeks of ageing, the samples were filtered, dried and characterized by XRD, FTIR and SEM.

Two compartment experiment

In order to prevent physical contact of the solid reactants and avoid physical incorporation of the gypsum in the strätlingite, a two component system was adopted. 4 g of gypsum was dispersed in 1L of distilled water and stirred for about 3 days and then filtered. A thin film of 0.3 g of previously synthesized strätlingite was placed in a HDPE vessel which has been carved into a beaker with double window (opening) just 1.5 cm above the bottom, Fig. 2. The vessel was then filled up with the filtered saturated solution of gypsum and allowed to stand for about 10 min for the strätlingite to settle. A second vessel was similarly prepared with 2 g of solid gypsum placed in it. The two vessels: one containing strätlingite and the other containing gypsum were completely immersed in a plastic tube (internal diameter 12 cm) containing the previously prepared gypsum solution. The tube was then sealed and the solution in the tube was stirred with the aid of magnetic stirrer and maintained at 5 °C, 20 ± 2 °C. A third set was kept at 55 °C and shaken at 60 strokes per minute. The small vessels are about 3.5 cm in diameter and were separated by ~4 cm. The second vessel containing 2 g gypsum was placed to provide the excess gypsum that will maintain saturation should any sulfate be uptaken by the solid as reaction proceeds. The ongoing saturation was confirmed by ion chromatographic analysis of the aqueous phase. After selected reaction time intervals, the products were filtered, dried in desiccators containing silica gel at room temperature, 20 ± 2 °C, and characterized by XRD. The gypsum solutions were replaced with fresh solutions at the start of each new interval.
Fig. 2

The two compartment experimental set up: previously illustrated [18]

The solution was stirred with the aid of a magnetic stirrer for the set-ups at 5 °C and 20 ± 2 °C and by shaking at the rate of 60 strokes/min in a water bath for the set up at 55 °C.

2.2.2 Strätlingite–calcite phase relations

Similar experiments as described in Sect. 2.2.1 were repeated with calcite in place of gypsum.

2.2.3 Strätlingite: AFt phase relations

A 1:1 molar mixture of strätlingite and SO4-AFt was slurried in degassed deionized water and aged at 20, 55 and 85 °C in HDPE/PTFE bottles for 4 weeks with periodic agitation. Thereafter, the sample were filtered and characterised by XRD.

Similarly, 1:1 molar mixture of strätlingite and CO3-AFt was slurried in degassed deionised water and aged at 20, 55 and 85 °C in HDPE/PTFE bottles for 4 weeks with periodic agitation. Thereafter, the sample were filtered and characterised by XRD.

2.2.4 Strätlingite: AFm phase relations

A 1:1 molar mixture of strätlingite and SO4-AFm (Ca4Al2SO4(OH)12·6H2O) was slurried in degassed deionised water and aged at 20, 55 and 85 °C with periodic agitation for 30 days in HDPE. Filtered and dried product solid was characterised by XRD, FTIR and SEM.

Similarly 1:1 molar mixture of strätlingite and CO3-AFm Ca4Al2CO3(OH)12. 5H2O was slurried in degassed deionized water and aged at 20, 55 and 85 °C as in the previous section.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Strätlingite in the presence of sulfate: 20–85 °C

3.1.1 Strätlingite–gypsum phase relation: 20–85 °C

The XRD pattern of the resulting solids (Fig. 3a) shows that strätlingite persisted in the presence of gypsum. The resulting phase assemblage was strätlingite, gypsum, and C–S–H at 20, 55 and 85 °C. The SEM image (Fig. 4a) of the strätlingite–gypsum–water mixture cured at 55 °C shows the clear monoclinic gypsum grains dispersed in strätlingite powder, suggesting coexistence of both phases, in agreement with the XRD pattern. The solid from the strätlingite–gypsum slurry at 85 °C was analysed by electron microprobe and the result show <1 % sulphur substitution over about ten random points analysed. The minute amount of sulphur detected in strätlingite may have either occurred as minor substitution or originated from the excess gypsum solid which perhaps has been physically incorporated into the grains of strätlingite.
Fig. 3

XRD patterns of the resulting solids from a Strätlingite–gypsum slurry cured for 30 days in supersaturated gypsum solution; b Strätlingite cured in saturated gypsum solution for 70 days: strätlingite persisted in the presence of gypsum

Fig. 4

a SEM image of strätlingite–gypsum–water mixture cured at 55 °C; shows no significant reaction; b IR spectra of strätlingite before reaction (i); and after 70 days cure in saturated gypsum solution aged at 20 °C (ii)

Further investigation by the two compartment system, first used in Okoronkwo [18], also shows that strätlingite is compatible with gypsum under the range of experimental conditions. Figure 2b presents the XRD pattern of strätlingite cured in saturated gypsum solution for 70 days at 20–85 °C. The IR spectra of the strätlingite sample cured for 70 days in saturated gypsum solution is shown in Fig. 4b. The assignment of the adsorption bands is summarized in Table 1, according to [9, 10, 16, 22]. The absorption at ~1065 and ~1400 cm−1 are assigned to C–O vibrations. The minor absorption band between 1035 and 1100 cm−1, centred at ~1065 cm−1 corresponds to that reported in literature for S–O stretching vibration and C–O associated with AFm and AFt phases [2, 3, 16]. But the absence of further absorption band which correspond to sulfate and presence of multiple bands characteristic of C–O supports that the band centred at ~1065 cm−1 is due to C–O vibration from contaminants and that sulfate uptake has been negligible. No changes were noted in the powder X-ray pattern relative to pure strätlingite. Thus, the coexistence of gypsum and strätlingite is confirmed but no evidence indicating mutual solid solution was adduced. In view of the bulky nature of the aluminosilicate interlayer ion it seems unlikely that substitution of the smaller sulfate should leave d-spacings unaffected.
Table 1

Assignment of infrared spectra data from strätlingite–gypsum relation studies; spectra shown in Fig. 4b

IR absorption band (cm−1)

530; 590; 965




710; 860; 1065;1240; 1410

Assignments of vibration


Si–O bending

Si–O vibration

Si–O–Al asymmetric


3.1.2 Strätlingite–SO4-AFt phase relation: 20–85 °C

The XRD pattern of the 1:1 molar mixture of strätlingite–SO4-AFt in water, after curing for 30 days (Fig. 5a), shows that strätlingite coexists with SO4-AFt at 20–85 °C. Results of the two compartment experiment corroborate previous results suggesting the compatibility of these phases (Fig. 5b).
Fig. 5

XRD patterns of a 1:1 molar mixture of strätlingite—SO4-AFt after 30 days reaction in water; b strätlingite after curing for 56 days in saturated SO4-AFt solution

3.1.3 Strätlingite–SO4-AFm phase relation: 20–85 °C

The XRD pattern of the mechanical mixture of strätlingite and SO4 2− AFm reacted for 30 days at 20–85 °C shows no evidence of reaction (Fig. 6b). Trace amounts of ettringite occurred but these were known to have been present in the original AFm sample (Fig. 6a). Strätlingite and SO4-AFm appear to coexist for this temperature range and duration of reaction.
Fig. 6

Strätlingite–SO4-AFm phase relation: a raw mixture before reaction; b after 30 days cure at 20, 55 and 85 °C: the phases appear to coexist

3.2 Strätlingite in the presence of carbonate: 20–85 °C

3.2.1 Strätlingite–calcite phase relation: 20–85 °C

The XRD pattern of the resulting solid after 4 weeks aging of the strätlingite–calcite slurry shows that the two phases are compatible under the conditions of the experiment; the presence of calcite, apparently does not affect the stability of strätlingite at 20 ± 2, 55 and 85 °C (Fig. 7a). The two phases coexisted at the studied temperatures and the peak positions of the X-ray reflections due to strätlingite have not been affected, suggesting, perhaps, that little or no structural substitution of CO3 2− has occurred in strätlingite as the peak position of the X-ray reflections due to strätlingite are unaffected. Further investigation by the two compartment experiment corroborated previous observation as the XRD pattern of strätlingite shows that strätlingite was not affected after curing in saturated calcite solution for 56 days at 20–85 °C (Fig. 7b). The minor XRD reflection at ~29.3°2θ in the XRD pattern of starting strätlingite reactant (Fig. 7b), due to minor calcite contaminant, has become prominent after curing for 56 days in saturated calcite solution. This apparently indicates minor precipitation of calcite into the strätlingite had occurred. IR spectra (Fig. 7c (ii)) of the strätlingite sample cured in calcite solution for 56 days at 20 °C similarly show a minor absorptions at ~1065, ~1240 and ~1400 cm−1 corresponding to C–O vibrations of carbonate, probably associated with “AFm-type strätlingite” [2, 3, 16, 22]. That indicates a minor uptake of carbonate in the form of calcite, which may have precipitated from solution and/or originating from atmospheric contamination, and like the case of sulfate has no implication for solid solution.
Fig. 7

XRD patterns of a 1:1 molar mixture of strätlingite–calcite after 30 days reaction in water; b strätlingite after curing for 56 days in saturated calcite solution; c IR spectra of strätlingite before reaction (i), and after 56 days cure in saturated calcite solution aged at 20 °C (ii)

3.2.2 Strätlingite–CO3-AFt phase relation: 20–85 °C

The XRD pattern of the 1:1 molar mixtures of strätlingite–CO3-AFt cured for 30 days (Fig. 8a) show that strätlingite coexists with CO3-AFt at 20 ± 2 °C. However at 55 °C, CO3-AFt had decomposed to calcite and AFm but strätlingite persisted. At 85 °C where CO3-AFt had completely decomposed and strätlingite, being less stable at this temperature, reacted forming mainly siliceous hydrogarnet which coexisted with calcite and C–S–H. Trace amounts of strätlingite was still detected at up to 30 days at 85 °C but not thereafter.
Fig. 8

XRD patterns of a 1:1 molar mixture of strätlingite—CO3-AFt after 30 days reaction in water; b strätlingite after curing for 56 days in saturated CO3-AFt solution

It is known that in relevant systems such as limestone-blended Portland cement hydration, carbonate activity is initially conditioned by calcite, followed by AFt but because CO3-AFt is metastable with respect to CO3-AFm [5], CO3-AFt is not formed under these conditions, leaving the system to be buffered with respect to carbonate by calcite and CO3-AFm. Also, carbonate AFm is unstable at high temperatures and its decomposition generates high alumina activity which causes strätlingite to start reacting at above 55 °C producing the more stable siliceous hydrogarnet. See also Sect. 3.2.3.

3.2.3 Strätlingite–CO3-AFm phase relations: 20–85 °C

The XRD pattern of the resulting solids shows that at 20 and 55 °C, strätlingite coexisted with CO3-AFm, but hydrogarnet solid solution forms at 55 °C while at 85 °C, the CO3-AFm had decomposed to mainly hydrogarnet solid solution and calcite (Fig. 9). It can be deduced that, the decomposing of CO3-AFm at high temperature increased the alumina activity in the solution, and as calcite crystallised, shift in mass balances promotes formation of hydrogarnet solid solution at temperature of 55 °C and above.
Fig. 9

Strätlingite–CO3-AFm phase relation at 20, 55 and 85 °C

From the results, strätlingite has shown compatibility with calcite, gypsum, sulfate and carbonate AFm and AFt at temperatures below about 55 °C. Strätlingite coexistence with AFt (ettringite), has also been predicted in previous thermodynamic models [1, 4].

Described phase compatibility is not only affected by temperature but also by ion activity and time. The early stages of cement hydration, at ~20 °C, when solid gypsum or other form of CaSO4 is present, sulfate activity is relatively high, conditioned by gypsum, but as gypsum is consumed to form AFt, the sulfate activity is instead conditioned by the composition and solubility of the AFt phase. As more calcium and alumina react, AFt is partially converted to AFm phase and the sulfate activity at this time is now buffered by the pair AFt-AFm. For most commercial cements, this state is reached within the first 24–48 h of hydration. The same principles operate for limestone-blended Portland cement hydration: carbonate activity is initially conditioned by calcite, followed by AFt but because CO3-AFt is metastable with respect to CO3-AFm [5], CO3-AFt is not formed under these conditions, leaving the system to be buffered with respect to carbonate by calcite and CO3-AFm.

Carbonate and sulfate variants of strätlingite are not well known. However the strätlingite structure can be regarded as a potential host for at least four anions common in cement systems—OH, Cl, SO4 and CO3. Chloride was not included in this study but the remaining three anions were either present or potentially present. The competition for anion content will depend on pH as well as the thermodynamic properties of the other coexisting solid phases and the aqueous activity of the relevant anion species. Assuming an alkali free system, a complete description of the anion content in strätlingite would differ for each assemblage and would be temperature dependent: the data would take the form of a series of distribution coefficients. The present data are insufficient to quantify these coefficients and their temperature dependence but a start has been made by determining the phase assemblages. However we note that many of these assemblages condition a low aqueous activities of sulfate and carbonate (the host solids containing these ions have low solubilities and the impact of solid solution on the powder patterns of strätlingite has not been quantified. But it is not surprising that in many assemblages OH strätlingite predominates. This finding is not in conflict with the observation that under other conditions especially of higher species activities of sulphate and carbonate, extensive anion substitution can occur in strätlingite. Indeed, in one experiment (Fig. 7) sufficient carbonate was recorded to influence the FTIR spectra.

In the presence of Mg, strätlingite has also been predicted to occur together with hydrotalcite-like phases and a wide range of observations supports this, for example data on systems formulated with activated calcined paper sludge, kaolinite and slag blends [6, 7, 8, 11, 12], all of which introduce Mg in various ways. However, for strätlingite to form in such blended cement systems, the compositions in terms of C–A–S ratio must lie in the phase region where strätlingite is readily stable [17, 18].

Data reported for the coexistence of strätlingite with other phases are generic: that is the amount of phase added does not affect the phase relations. However we have controlled the activity of species such as sulfate and carbonate by using those phases which are known to occur in commercial cements: if it were forced as by adding a soluble carbonate salt, we might depart form conditions in commercial cement and the stability of phases and limits of composition altered. So when we conclude that solid solution is negligible, the conclusion is conditional. That is, it applies to the conditions of the experiment, the most important condition being what other phases are present. But the result is still generic in the sense that the amount of other phases is not crucial with respect to determining reaction direction. And we have chosen conditions which are relevant to modern commercial cements including those modified by supplementary materials. For example, strätlingite is thermally destabilised in the presence of carbonate AFm where siliceous hydrogarnet forms at 55 °C and above. For similar reasons we avoid giving a single value for the upper stability limit of strätlingite: the exact temperature is conditional, depending on what other phases are present.

4 Conclusions

At the level of soluble anion concentrations found in Portland based cements, a few tens of ppm in pore fluid, sulfate and carbonate do not substitute significantly for OH in the strätlingite structure. Thus, while strätlingite is structurally an AFm type phase, it is unlike silica—free AFm members: strätlingite binds insignificant sulfate and carbonate at pH ~12. Strätlingite shows compatibility with gypsum, calcite, sulfate and carbonate AFm and AFt at temperatures below about 55 °C. The resistant of its structure to attack by anions is attributable to the stability of the double tetrahedral aluminosilicate interlayer. Results can safely be used to predict conditions under which strätlingite will form and persist in Portland and modified Portland cements.



The TETFund Nigeria and Abia State University Uturu are acknowledged for financial support.


  1. 1.
    Atkins M, Bennett DG, Dawes AC, Glasser FP, Kindness A, Read D (1992) A thermodynamic model for blended cements. Cem Concr Res 22:497–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bensted J, Varma SP (1974) Some applications of Infrared and Raman spectroscopy in cement chemistry part 3—hydration of portland cement and its constituents. Cem Technol 5:440–450Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bensted J, Varma SP (1973) Studies of ettringite and its derivatives, part 4: the low-sulphate form of calcium sulphoaluminate (monosulphate). Cem Technol 4:112–115Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Damidot D, Lothenbach B, Herfort D, Glasser FP (2011) Thermodynamics and cement science. 13th ICCC Madrid. Cem Concr Res 41:679–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Damidot D, Stronach S, Kindness A, Atkins M, Glasser FP (1994) Thermodynamic investigation of the CaO–Al2O3–CaCO3–H2O closed system at 25 °C and the influence of Na2O. Cem Concr Res 24:563–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fernández R, Nebreda B, De La Villa RV, García R, Frías M (2010) Mineralogical and chemical evolution of hydrated phases in the pozzolanic reaction of calcined paper sludge. Cem Concr Compos 32:775–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    García R, Vigil de la Villa R, Rodríguez O, Frías M (2010) Study of hydrated phases present in calcined paper sludge (metakaolinite)/saturated CaO dissolution system cured at 40 °C and 28 days of reaction. Mater Sci Eng A 527:3939–3941Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    García R, Vigil de la Villa R, Rodríguez O, Frías M (2009) Mineral phases formation on the pozzolan/lime/water system. Appl Clay Sci 3–4:335Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hidalgo López A, García Calvo JL, García Olmo J, Petit S, Alonso MC (2008) Microstructural evolution of calcium aluminate cements hydration with silica fume and fly ash additions by scanning electron microscopy, and mid and near-infrared spectroscopy. J Am Ceram Soc 91:1258–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Horgnies M, Chen JJ, Bouillon C (2013) Overview about the use of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy to study cementitious materials. 6th Int Conf Comput Methods Exp Mater Charact 77:251–262Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Largo OR, De La Villa RV, Jiménez RG, Gõmez BN, Frías M (2011) Lower temperature activation for kaolinite-based clay waste: evaluation of hydrated phases during the pozzolanic reaction. J Am Ceram Soc 94:1224–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lothenbach B, Gruskovnjak A (2007) Hydration of alkali-activated slag: thermodynamic modelling. Adv Cem Res 19:81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matschei T (2009) Thermodynamics of Cement Hydration. PhD Thesis. University of AberdeenGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Matschei T, Glasser FP (2010) Temperature dependence, 0–40 °C, of the mineralogy of Portland cement paste in the presence of calcium carbonate. Cem Concr Res 40:763–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Matschei T, Lothenbach B, Glasser FP (2007) Thermodynamic properties of Portland cement hydrates in the system CaO–Al2O3–SiO2–CaSO4–CaCO3–H2O. Cem Concr Res 37:1379–1410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mendes A, Gates WP, Sanjaya JG, Collins F (2011) NMR, XRD, IR and synchrotron NEXAFS spectrosopic sudies of OPC and OPC/slag cement paste hydrates. Mater Struct 44:1773–1791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Okoronkwo MU, Glasser FP (2015) The lime–alumina–silica–water system: implications for the long-term durability of cement–steel composites. In: Proceedings of 14th ICCC, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Okoronkwo MU (2014) Phase development in cement hydrate systems. PhD Thesis, University of AberdeenGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rinaldi R, Sacerdoti M, Passaglia E (1990) Stratlingite: crystal structure, chemistry, and a reexamination of its polytype vertumnite. Eur J Miner 2:841–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shape Software (2013) ATOMS V6.4.1Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Taylor HFW (1997) Cement chemistry. Thomas Telford Publishing Services Ltd, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Trezza MA, Lavat AE (2001) Analysis of the system 3CaO·Al2O3–CaSO4·2H2O–CaCO3–H2O by FT-IR spectroscopy. Cem Concr Res 31:869–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of AberdeenOld AberdeenUK
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryAbia State UniversityUturuNigeria

Personalised recommendations