Materials and Structures

, Volume 49, Issue 7, pp 2509–2524 | Cite as

New insights into autogenous self-healing in cement paste based on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) tests

Original Article

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of water migration from cracks into the bulk paste on autogenous self-healing. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technique was utilized to monitor water migration from cracks into the bulk paste during the process of autogenous self-healing. NMR results show that initially the water in the crack migrates into the bulk paste and the water content of the bulk paste increases significantly. However, after 5-h autogenous self-healing, the amount of non-chemically bound water in the bulk paste (adjacent to the crack surfaces) determined by NMR decreased instead. It indicates that some of the water coming from the crack was used for additional hydration of unhydrated cement particles in the bulk paste (during the process of autogenous self-healing). Before this study, in term of autogenous self-healing only the recoveries that related to the filling of cracks were concerned. The observation and quantification of densification of cement paste adjacent to the crack surfaces provides a new insight into autogenous self-healing.

Keywords

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) Autogenous self-healing Water migration Additional hydration Cement paste 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program: 2011CB013800), National Nature Science Fund (51178104) and the China Scholarship Council (CSC) for the financial support. Mrs Jingping Han’s help on the NMR experiments is also appreciated.

References

  1. 1.
    van Breugel K (2012) Self-healing material concepts as solution for aging infrastructure. In 37th conference on our world in concrete & structures, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dry CM (2000) Three designs for the internal release of sealants, adhesives, and waterproofing chemicals into concrete to reduce permeability. Cem Concr Res 30(12):1969–1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ramachandran SK, Ramakrishnan V, Bang SS (2001) Remediation of concrete using micro-organisms. ACI Mater J 98:3–9Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ahn TH, Kishi T (2010) Crack self-healing behavior of cementitious composites incorporating various mineral admixtures. J Adv Concr Technol 8(2):16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Joseph C, Jefferson A, Isaacs B, Lark R, Gardner D (2010) Experimental investigation of adhesive-based self-healing of cementitious materials. Mag Concr Res 62(11):831–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Tittelboom K, De Belie N, Van Loo D, Jacobs P (2011) Self-healing efficiency of cementitious materials containing tubular capsules filled with healing agent. Cem Concr Compos 33(4):497–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wiktor V, Jonkers HM (2011) Quantification of crack-healing in novel bacteria-based self-healing concrete. Cem Concr Compos 33(7):763–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang J, Van Tittelboom K, De Belie N, Verstraete W (2012) Use of silica gel or polyurethane immobilized bacteria for self-healing concrete. Constr Build Mater 26(1):532–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Rooij MK, Tittelboom Van, De Belie N, Schlangen E (2013) Self-healing phenomena in cement-based materials. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Soroker VJ, Denson AJ (1926) Autogenous healing of concrete. Zement 25(30):76Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brandeis F (1937) Autogenous healing of concrete. Beton u Eisen 36(12):11Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hearn N (1998) Self-sealing, autogenous healing and continued hydration: what is the difference? Mater Struct 31(8):563–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hyde GW, Smith WJ (1889) Results of experiments made to determine the permeability of cements and cement mortars. J Frankl Inst Phila 128:199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Glanville WH (1931) The permeability of Portland cement concrete. Build Res Tech Pap 3:1–61Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sahmaran M, Keskin SB, Ozerkan G, Yaman IO (2008) Self-healing of mechanically-loaded self consolidating concretes with high volumes of fly ash. Cem Concr Compos 30(10):872–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Tittelboom K, Gruyaert E, Rahier H, De Belie N (2012) Influence of mix composition on the extent of autogenous crack healing by continued hydration or calcium carbonate formation. Constr Build Mater 37:349–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lv Z, Chen H (2013) Self-healing efficiency of unhydrated cement nuclei for dome-like crack mode in cementitious materials. Mater Struct 46:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang Y, Lepech MD, Yang E-H, Li VC (2009) Autogenous healing of engineered cementitious composites under wet-dry cycles. Cem Concr Res 39(5):382–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Qian S, Zhou J, de Rooij MR, Schlangen E, Ye G, van Breugel K (2009) Self-healing behavior of strain hardening cementitious composites incorporating local waste materials. Cem Concr Compos 31(9):613–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Granger S, Loukili A, Pijaudier-Cabot G, Chanvillard G (2007) Experimental characterization of the self-healing of cracks in an ultra high performance cementitious material: mechanical tests and acoustic emission analysis. Cem Concr Res 37(4):519–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ter Heide N (2005) Crack healing in hydrating concrete. Msc, Delft University of Technology, DelftGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Edvardsen C (1999) Water permeability and autogenous healing of cracks in concrete. ACI Mater J 96(4):448–454Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reinhardt H-W, Jooss M (2003) Permeability and self-healing of cracked concrete as a function of temperature and crack width. Cem Concr Res 33(7):981–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hearn N, Morley C (1997) Self-sealing property of concrete-experimental evidence. Mater Struct 30(7):404–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schlangen E, Ter Heide N, van Breugel K (2006) Crack healing of early age cracks in concrete. In: Konsta-Gdoutos MS (ed) Measuring, monitoring and modeling concrete properties. Springer, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Huang H, Ye G, Damidot D (2013) Characterization and quantification of self-healing behaviors of microcracks due to further hydration in cement paste. Cem Concr Res 52:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jacobsen S, Sellevold EJ (1996) Self healing of high strength concrete after deterioration by freeze/thaw. Cem Concr Res 26(1):55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li VC, Yang E-H (2007) Self-healing in concrete materials. In: van der Zwaag S (ed) Self healing materials an alternative approach to 20 centuries of materials science. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Huang H, Ye G, Damidot D (2014) Effect of blast furnace slag on self-healing of microcracks in cementitious materials. Cem Concr Res 60:68–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Callaghan PT (1991) Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Blumich B (2000) NMR imaging of materials. Oxford Science Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hazrati K, Pel L, Marchand J, Kopinga K, Pigeon M (2002) Determination of isothermal unsaturated capillary flow in high performance cement mortars by NMR imaging. Mater Struct 35(10):614–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Valckenborg R, Pel L, Hazrati K, Kopinga K, Marchand J (2001) Pore water distribution in mortar during drying as determined by NMR. Mater Struct 34(10):599–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Friedemann K, Stallmach F, Kärger J (2006) NMR diffusion and relaxation studies during cement hydration—a non-destructive approach for clarification of the mechanism of internal post curing of cementitious materials. Cem Concr Res 36(5):817–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kimmich R (1997) NMR tomography, diffusometry, relaxometry. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    McDonald PJ, Mitchell J, Mulheron M, Monteilhet L, Korb JP (2007) Two-dimensional correlation relaxation studies of cement pastes. Magn Reson Imaging 25(4):470–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kopinga K, Pel L (1994) One-dimensional scanning of moisture in porous materials with NMR. Rev Sci Instrum 65(12):3673–3681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pel L (1995) Moisture transport in porous building materials. Ph.D, Eindhoven University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Powers TC, Brownyard TL (1948) Studies of the physical properties of hardened Portland cement paste (9 parts), J Am Concr Inst 43, Bulletin 22, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Parrot LJ, Killoh DC (1984) Prediction of cement hydration. Br Ceram Proc 35:41–53Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Taylor HFW (1997) Cement chemistry. Thomas Telford Publishing, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ye G (2003) Experimental study and numerical simulation of the development of the microstructure and permeability of cementitious materials. PhD, Delft University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    van der Lee J, de Windt L (1999) “CHESS.” from http://chess.geosciences.ensmp.fr/
  44. 44.
    Liu J, Xing F, Dong B, Ma H, Pan D (2014) Study on water sorptivity of the surface layer of concrete. Mater Struct 47(11):1941–1951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bogue RH (1955) The chemistry of Portland cement. Reinhold Pub. Corp, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Materials Science and EngineeringSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Department of Civil Engineering and GeoscienceDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Structural EngineeringGhent UniversityGhentBelguim
  4. 4.Department of Applied PhysicsEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations