Skip to main content
Log in

Cyclic performance of precast concrete shear walls with a mortar–sleeve connection for longitudinal steel bars

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To study the cyclic performance of precast concrete shear walls with a mortar–sleeve connection for longitudinal steel bars, a quasistatic test on shear wall specimens with flexure failure modes was carried out. The longitudinal steel bars in the precast concrete walls were connected with a steel sleeve using mortar. Test results indicated that the mortar–sleeve splicing effectively transferred the stresses on the vertical steel bars. The failure mode of the precast shear wall specimens had similar behaviors to that of the cast-in-place shear wall specimen, including the tensile yielding of the longitudinal steel bars and the crushing of the concrete in the compressive zone. The stiffness and energy dissipation capacity of the precast wall specimens were less than those of the cast-in-place wall specimen. The ultimate drift ratio of the precast wall specimens ranged from 1.69 to 2.08 %. The integrity of the precast shear walls with a vertical rough interface was better than that of the precast shear walls with a vertical step groove.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xue W, Wang D (2002) Progress of pre-cast concrete slab and wall system. Ind Constr 32(12):57–60

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cleland NM (1997) Design for lateral force resistance with pre-cast concrete shear walls. PCI J 5:44–64

    Google Scholar 

  3. Basler E (1963) Allgemeine merklnale der vorfabrikation. Teehn. Forsehungsun Reratungsstelle der sehweizerischen Zementindustrie, Wildegg

    Google Scholar 

  4. Englekirk RE (2004) Impact of Northridge earthquake on pre-cast concrete design practice. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 13:457–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Muguruma H, Nishiyarna M, Watanabe F (1995) Lessons learned from the Kobe earthquake: a Japanese perspective. PCI J 4:28–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arditi D, Ergin U, Gunhan S (2000) Factors affecting the use of pre-cast concrete systems. J Archit Eng 3:79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cleland NM (1997) Design for lateral force resistance with pre-cast concrete shear walls. PCI J 5:44–64

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sun J (1986) Behavior of the reinforcement in pre-cast structures. Beijing Institute of Architecture Design

  9. Rizkalla SH, Serrette RL, Heuvel JS (1989) Multiple shear key connections for pre-cast shear wall panels. PCI J 1:104–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schultz AE, Magana RA, Tadros MK, Huo X (1994) Experimental study of joint connections in pre-cast concrete walls. Fifth U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering, vol II, 10–14 July 1994

  11. Soudki KA, Rizkalla SH (1995) Horizontal connection for pre-cast concrete shear walls subjected to cyclic deformations. PCI J 4:78–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Priestley MJN, MacRae GA (1996) Seismic tests of pre-cast beam-to-column joint subassemblages with unbounded tendons. PCI J 41(1):64–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Perez FDJ (1998) Lateral load behavior and design of unbonded post-tensioned pre-cast concrete walls with ductile vertical joint connectors. Theses and Dissertations, Paper 567

  14. PCI Connection Details Committee (2008) PCI connections manual for pre-cast and prestressed concrete construction, 1st edn. PCI, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  15. Belleri A, Riva P (2012) Seismic performance and retrofit of pre-cast concrete grouted sleeve connections. PCI J 57(1):97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aslam M, Goddon WG, Scalise DT (1980) Earthquake rocking response of rigid bodies. J Struct Div ASCE 106(2):377–392

    Google Scholar 

  17. Housner GW (1963) The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 53(2):403–417

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kurama Y, Sause R, Pessiki S, Lu LW, El-Sheikh M (1998) Seismic design and response evaluation of un-bonded post-tensioned pre-cast concrete walls. Pre-cast Seismic Structural Systems (PRESSS), Rep. No. 98(03) Lehigh Univ., Lehigh, Pa., Rep. No. EQ-97-01

  19. Boroschek RL, Yáñez FV (2000) Experimental verification of basic analytical assumptions used in the analysis of structural wall buildings. Eng Struct 22(6):657–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mitchell D, Cook W, Deng Y, Liu J (2014) Confinement of columns and wall boundary elements using headed bars. J Struct Eng 140(3):04013080

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Hang Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peng, YY., Qian, JR. & Wang, YH. Cyclic performance of precast concrete shear walls with a mortar–sleeve connection for longitudinal steel bars. Mater Struct 49, 2455–2469 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0660-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0660-0

Keywords

Navigation