Materials and Structures

, Volume 49, Issue 4, pp 1455–1468 | Cite as

Comparison of compressive and splitting tensile strength of autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) containing water hyacinth and polypropylene fibre subjected to elevated temperatures

Original Article
  • 301 Downloads

Abstract

This paper described the results of an extensive experimental study on the comparative between compressive and splitting tensile behavior of autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) containing water hyacinth fibre (WHF) with AAC mixed with polypropylene (PP) fibre. The specimens of AAC-WHF and the AAC-PP were subjected to elevated temperatures (100, 200, 400, 800 and 1000 °C). Test results indicated that an optimum water hyacinth and PP fibre dosage was at 0.5 and 0.75 % by volume respectively. The maximum residual in compressive strength and the splitting tensile strength of AAC-WHF and AAC-PP were 0.43 and 0.16 N/mm2 and 0.51 and 0.18 N/mm2 respectively. In addition, the loss in residual strength of AAC mixed PP fibre was slower than AAC mixed WHF. The splitting tensile strength of AACs was more sensitive to high temperatures than the compressive strength. A severe strength loss was observed for all of the AAC after exposure to 800 °C. Based on the test results, it can be concluded that the addition of PP fibers can significantly promote the residue mechanical properties of AAC during heating.

Keywords

Autoclaved aerated concrete Polypropylene fibre Water hyacinth fibre High temperature 

References

  1. 1.
    Abeles PW, Bardhan-Roy BK (1981) Prestressed concrete designer’s handbook, 3rd edn. A Viewpoint Publication, Cement and Concrete Association, Wexham Springs, p 516Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al-Akhras NM, Abu-Alfoul BA (2001) Effect of wheat straw ash on mechanical properties of autoclaved mortar. Cem Conr Res 32:859–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Asamoah MA, Owusu RA (2011) A comparative study of Bamboo reinforced concrete beams using different stirrup materials for rural construction. J Civ Struct Eng 1:407–423Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ASTM C150-92 (2004) Standard specification for portland cement. Annual book of ASTM standards, vol 1–4, ASTM, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    ASTM C39/C39 M-04 (2004) Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. Annual book of ASTM standards, vol 1–4, ASTM, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    ASTM C496/C496 M-04 (2004) Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. Annual book of ASTM standards, vol 1–4, ASTM, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aydin S, Yazici H, Baradan B (2008) High temperature resistance of normal strength and autoclaved high strength mortars incorporated polypropylene and steel fibres. Constr Build Mater 22:504–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bakula F, Kaucic V (1994) The study of autoclaved cellulose fiber-reinforced cement composites. Cem Concr Res 25(1):71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barrett SCH (1989) Waterweed invasions. Sci Am 261(4):66–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beg MDH, Pickering KL (2008) Reprocessing of wood fibre reinforced polypropylene composites. Part II: hygrothermal ageing and its effects. Compos A 39:1565–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bilodeau A, Malhotra VM (2000) High-volume fly ash system: concrete solution for sustainable development. ACI Mater J 97(1):41–49Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    BS 12:1991 (2001) Specification for portland cement. British Standards, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cabrera JG, Lynsdale CJ (1988) A new gas permeameter for measuring the permeability of mortar and concrete. Mag Concr Res 40(144):177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chan YN, Luo X, Sun W (2000) Compressive strength and pore-structure of high-performance concrete after exposure to high temperature up to 800 °C. Cem Concr Res 30:247–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen B, Liu J (2004) Residual strength of hybrid-fibre-reinforced high-strength concrete after exposure to high temperature. Cem Concr Res 34(6):1065–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Davies RM, Mohammed US (2011) Moisture-dependent engineering properties of water hyacinth parts. Singap J Sci Res 1:253–263Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gallé C, Sercombe J (2001) Permeability and pore structure evolution of silicocalcareous and hematite high-strength concretes submitted to high temperatures. Mater Struct 34:619–628Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gram HE (1983) Durability of natural fibres in concrete. Swedish Cement and Concrete Research Institute, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Han CG, Hwang YS, Yang SH, Gowripalan N (2005) Performance of spalling resistance of high performance concrete with polypropylene fiber contents and lateral confinement. Cem Concr Res 35(9):1747–1753Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hannant DS (1987) Fiber cements and fiber concrete. Wiley, New York, p 219Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hongkwan L, Su K (2009) Preparation and physical properties of wood/polypropylene/clay nanocomposites. J Apply Polym Sci 111:2769–2776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Israngkura Na Ayudhya B, Ungkoon Y, Sanitboon P, Jatipatranat W (2008) Study of perlite application in autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) 4th annual concrete conference, 20–22 Oct 2008, Ubonrathani. Thailand, pp 77–82Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jianhuang X, Falkner H (2006) On residual strength of high performance concrete with and without polypropylene fibres at elevated temperatures. Fire Saf J 41:115–121Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kalifa P, Tsimbrovska M (1998) Comportement des BHP à hautes températures—Etat de la question et résultats expérimentaux, Cahier du CSTB, No. 3078Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Laukaitis A, Keriene J et al (2009) Influence of fibrous additives on properties of aerated autoclaved concrete forming mixtures and strength characteristics of products. Constr Build Mater 23(9):3034–3042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Luccioni BM, Figueroa MI, Danesi RF (2003) Thermo-mechanic model for concrete exposed to elevated temperatures. Eng Struct 25(6):729–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Meddah MS, Bencheikh M (2009) Properties of concrete reinforced with different kinds of industrials waste fibre materials. Constr Build Mater 23:3196–3205Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mydin MAO, Wang YC (2011) Mechanical properties of foamed concrete exposed to high temperatures. Constr Build Mater 26(1):638–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Narayanan N, Ramanurthy K (2000) Microstructural investigations on aerated concrete. Cem Concr Res 30:457–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nimityongkul P, Chatveera B (1995) Alternative use of water hyacinth fibre as randomly-oriented reinforcement in roofing. Eng Inst Thail J 46(2):36–42Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Panyakaew S, Fotios S (2008) Agricultural waste materials as thermal insulation for dwellings in Thailand: preliminary results. In: PLEA 25th conference on passive and low energy architecture, Durbin, 22–24 Oct 2008Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Phan LT (1996) Fire performance of high strength concrete: a report of the state-of-the-art. Building and Fire Research Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pinto J, Paiva A, Varumd H, Costa A, Cruz D, Pereira S (2011) Corn’s cob as a potential ecological thermal insulation material. Energy Build 43:1985–1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Poon CS, Azhar S, Anson M, Wong YL (2003) Performance of metakaolin concrete at elevated temperatures. Cem Concr Compos 25(1):83–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rahman MM, Rashid MH, Hossain MA, Hasan MT, Hasan MK (2011) Performance evaluation of bamboo reinforced concrete beam. Int J Eng Technol 11(4):142–146Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ramakrishna G, Sundararajan T (2005) Studies on the durability of natural fibres and the effect of corroded fibres on the strength of mortar. Cem Concr Compos 27:575–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sakr K, Hakim EE (2005) Effect of high temperature or fire on heavy weight concrete properties. Cem Concr Res 35(3):590–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shafigh P, Jummatt MZ, Mahmud HB, Hamid NAA (2012) Lightweight concrete made from crushed oil palm shell: tensile strength and effect of initial curing on compressive strength. Constr Build Mater 27:252–258Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Shah SP (1991) Do fibres increase the tensile strength of cement-based matrixes? ACI Mater J 88(6):595–602Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sinica M, Sezeman G et al (2014) Impact of complex additive consisting of continous basalt fibres and SiO2 microdust on strength and heat resistance properties of autoclaved aerated concrete. Constr Build Mater 50:718–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Soroushian P, Marikunte S (1990) Reinforcement of cement-based materials with cellulose fibres. Thin-section fibre reinforced concrete and ferrocement, SP-124. American Concrete Institute, Detroit, pp 99–124Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tanyildzi H (2009) Statistical analysis for mechanical properties of polypropylene fibre reinforced lightweight concrete containing silica fume exposed to high temperature. Mater Design 30:3252–3258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tarun RN, Kraus RN (2002) Temperature effects on high-performance concrete. Report on CBU-2002-07 REP-460. Department of Civil Engineering and Mechanics College of Engineering and Applied Science, the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USAGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    TIS 1505-1998 (2006) Autoclaved aerated lightweight concrete elements. Thai Industrial Standard, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Viwatsakpol S, Chaysuwan D, Heness G (2012) Mortar reinforced with water hyacinth fibre. Master thesis, Department of Materials Engineering, Kasestsart University, Bangkok, Thailand Google Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringRajamangala University of Technology KrungthepBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations