Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating the moisture damage of asphalt mixture modified with nano zinc oxide

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the main distresses of hot mix asphalt (HMA) is moisture damage. The most common method for decreasing this type of distress is using antistrip additives. In this study, the effect of nanoparticles was evaluated as an antistrip agent on the moisture damage of HMA. Two types of aggregates were evaluated in this study with different sensitivities against moisture damage (limestone and granite aggregate) and the asphalt binder with 60/70 penetration grade and nano zinc oxide (ZnO) in two different percentages by weight of the asphalt binder. The tests employed to evaluate the effects of modifying asphalt binder by nanomaterials on the moisture damage of asphalt mixture were surface free energy (SFE) and AASHTO T283. The results showed that the ratio of wet/dry values of indirect tensile strength for the mixtures containing nano ZnO for two types of aggregate were higher than the control mixtures. In addition, the results of the SFE method showed that adding nano ZnO increased the total SFE of the asphalt binder, which led to better coating of the aggregate with asphalt binder. Nano ZnO decreased the acid to base ratio of SFE of asphalt binder, while it led to improving adhesion between the asphalt binder and acidic aggregate that are prone to moisture damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Breakah TM, Williams RC (2015) Stochastic finite element analysis of moisture damage in hot mix asphalt. Mater Struct 48(1–2):93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sengoz B, Agar E (2007) Effect of asphalt film thickness on the moisture sensitivity characteristics of hot-mix asphalt. Build Environ 42:3621–3628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bagampadde U, Isacsson U, Kiggundu B (2006) Impact of bitumen and aggregate composition on stripping in bituminous mixtures. Mater Struct 39:303–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mercado EA (2007) Influence of fundamental material properties and air void structure on moisture damage of asphalt mixes. Dissertation, Texas A&M University

  5. Bhasin A (2006) Development of methods to quantify bitumen–aggregate adhesion and loss of adhesion due to water. Dissertation, Texas A&M University

  6. Ekblad J, Lundström R, Simonsen E (2013) Water susceptibility of asphalt mixtures as influenced by hydraulically active fillers. Mater Struct. doi:10.1617/s11527-013-0220-4

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kok BV, Yilmaz M (2009) The effects of using lime and styrene–butadiene–styrene on moisture sensitivity resistance of hot mix asphalt. Constr Build Mater 23:1999–2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aksoy A, Şamlioglu K, Tayfur S, Özen H (2005) Effects of various additives on the moisture damage sensitivity of asphalt mixtures. Constr Build Mater 19:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gubler R, Partl M, Canestrari F, Grilli A (2005) Influence of water and temperature on mechanical properties of selected asphalt pavements. Mater Struct 38:523–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Solaimanian M, Bonaquist RF, Tandon V (2007) Improved conditioning and testing procedures for HMA moisture susceptibility. Transportation Research Board 589

  11. Shah BD (2003) Evaluation of moisture damage within asphalt concrete mixes. Dissertation, Texas A&M University

  12. Lytton RL, Masad EA, Zollinger C, Bulut R, Little DN (2005) Measurements of surface energy and its relationship to moisture damage. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A & M University System

  13. Clint JH (2001) Adhesion and components of solid surface energies. Curr Opin Colloid Interf Sci 6:28–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Packham D (1996) Work of adhesion: contact angles and contact mechanics. Int J Adhes Adhes 16:121–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheng D, Little DN, Lytton RL, Holste JC (2002) Use of surface free energy properties of the asphalt–aggregate system to predict moisture damage potential. J Assoc Asphalt Pav Technol 71:59–88

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hefer AW (2004) Adhesion in bitumen–aggregate systems and quantification of the effects of water on the adhesive bond. Dissertation, Texas A&M University

  17. Zollinger CJ (2005) Application of surface energy measurements to evaluate moisture susceptibility of asphalt and aggregates. Dissertation, Texas A&M University

  18. Kim S-H, Jeong J-H, Kim N (2003) Use of surface free energy properties to predict moisture damage potential of asphalt concrete mixture in cyclic loading condition. KSCE J Civ Eng 7:381–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Howson J, Bhasin A, Masad E, Lytton R, Little D (2009) Development of a database for surface energy of aggregates and asphalt binders. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A & M University System

  20. Wasiuddin NM, Fogle CM, Zaman MM, O’Rear EA (2007) Effect of antistrip additives on surface free energy characteristics of asphalt binders for moisture-induced damage potential. J Test Evaluat 35:36

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wasiuddin NM, Zaman MM, O’Rear EE (2007b) Effect of polymeric aggregate treatment using styrene–butadiene rubber (SBR) for moisture-induced damage potential. In: Transportation research board 86th annual meeting 7, p 3248

  22. Arabani M, Hamedi GH (2010) Using the surface free energy method to evaluate the effects of polymeric aggregate treatment on moisture damage in hot-mix asphalt. J Mater Civ Eng 23:802–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Arabani M, Hamedi GH (2014) Using the surface free energy method to evaluate the effects of liquid antistrip additives on moisture sensitivity in hot mix asphalt. Int J Pavement Eng 15:66–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Khodaii A, Khailfeh V, Dehand M, Hamedi GH (2014) Evaluating the effect of zycosoil on moisture damage of hot mix asphalt using the surface energy method. J Mater Civ Eng 26(2):259–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nejad FM, Hamedi GH, Azarhoosh A (2012) The use of surface free energy method to evaluate the mechanism of the effect of hydrate lime on moisture damage of hot mix asphalt. J Mater Civ Eng 25:1119–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xiao F, Amirkhanian AN, Amirkhanian SN (2011) Long-term ageing influence on rheological characteristics of asphalt binders containing carbon nanoparticles. Int J Pavement Eng 12:533–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Steyn WJ (2011) Applications of nanotechnology in road pavement engineering. In: Gopalakrishnan K, Birgisson B, Taylor P, Attoh-Okine NO (eds) Nanotechnology in civil infrastructure: a paradigm shift. Springer, Berlin, pp 49–83

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Larsen-Basse J, Chong KP, de Miguel Y, Porro A, Bartos P (2006) Nanomaterials in construction and rehabilitation: contributions and perspectives of the US National Science Foundation. NICOM 2: 2nd international symposium on nanotechnology in construction. RILEM SARL, Bagneux, pp 17–25

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chong K (2004) Nanotechnology in civil engineering. R Soc Chem 292:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  30. You Z, Mills-Beale J, Foley JM, Roy S, Odegard GM, Dai Q, Goh SW (2011) Nanoclay-modified asphalt materials: preparation and characterization. Constr Build Mater 25:1072–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pauli A, Grimes W, Huang S, Robertson R (2003) Surface energy studies of SHRP asphalts by AFM: stability and compatibility of heavy oils and residua Am Chem Soc Div Petrol Chem 48:14–18

    Google Scholar 

  32. Battez AH et al (2008) CuO, ZrO2 and ZnO nanoparticles as antiwear additive in oil lubricants. Wear 265:422–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Karahancer SS, Kiristi M, Terzi S, Saltan M, Oksuz AU, Oksuz L (2014) Performance evaluation of nano-modified asphalt concrete. Constr Build Mater 71:283–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tanzadeh J, Vahedi F, Kheiry PT, Tanzadeh R (2013) Laboratory study on the effect of nano TiO2 on rutting performance of asphalt pavements. Adv Mater Res 622:990–994

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yusoff NIM, Breem AAS, Alattug HN, Hamim A, Ahmad J (2014) The effects of moisture susceptibility and ageing conditions on nano-silica/polymer-modified asphalt mixtures. Constr Build Mater 72:139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mathew TV, Rao KK (2006) Introduction to transportation engineering civil engineering–transportation engineering. IIT Bombay, NPTEL ONLINE

  37. Huang B, Li G, Mohammad LN (2003) Analytical modeling and experimental study of tensile strength of asphalt concrete composite at low temperatures. Compos B Eng 34:705–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hefer AW, Bhasin A, Little DN (2006) Bitumen surface energy characterization using a contact angle approach. J Mater Civ Eng 18:759–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Van Oss CJ, Chaudhury MK, Good RJ (1988) Interfacial Lifshitz-van der Waals and polar interactions in macroscopic systems. Chem Rev 88:927–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tarrer A, Wagh V (1991) The effect of the physical and chemical characteristics of the aggregate on bonding. Strategic Highway Research Program. National Research Council, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hossain Z, Bhudhala A, Zaman M, O’Rear E, Cross E, Lewis S (2009) Evaluation of the use of warm mix asphalt as a viable paving material in the United States. Research report. Federal Highway Administration, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, USA

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fereidoon Moghadas Nejad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamedi, G.H., Nejad, F.M. & Oveisi, K. Estimating the moisture damage of asphalt mixture modified with nano zinc oxide. Mater Struct 49, 1165–1174 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0566-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0566-x

Keywords

Navigation