Materials and Structures

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 783–793 | Cite as

An experimental study on self-centering and ductility of pseudo-elastic shape memory alloy (PESMA) fiber reinforced beam and beam-column joint specimens

Original Article

Abstract

The use of energy dissipating materials both as reinforcement and as external devices for passive control of reinforced concrete structures is a widely accepted method in the construction industry. The present technologies have some limitations related to ageing, durability, corrosion and geometry restoration after strong events (for example, yielding in steel). An alternative reinforcement material such as shape memory alloy (SMA) could offer scope for having large recoverable deformations (self-centering ability), thus improving performance especially after a severe loading has occurred. In addition to enhancing the ductility of reinforced concrete, they can provide a wide range of performances, from full self-centering to high energy dissipation capabilities, as well as high resistance to large strain cycle fatigue and better durability. This paper reports on several experiments and analyses for evaluating the self-centering ability, ductility of beams and beam-column joint achieved by randomly distributed pseudoelastic SMA (PESMA) fibers. Three point loading experiments on prisms and specially designed prototype beam-column joint specimens with steel and PESMA fibers show that the ductility and self-centering ability of the composite with PESMA fibers is far superior to that of the steel fibers.

Keywords

Pseudoelastic shape memory alloy fiber Self-centering ability Ductility Steel fiber Three point loading 

References

  1. 1.
    Alam MS, Nehdi M, Youssef MA (2009) Seismic performance of concrete frame structures reinforced with superelastic shape memory alloys. Smart Struct Syst 5(5):565–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andrawes B, DesRoches R (2005) Unseating prevention for multiple frame bridges using superelastic devices. Smart Mater Struct 14:60–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aoude H, Cook DW, Mitchell D (2009) Behavior of columns constructed with fibers and self-consolidating concrete. ACI Struct J 106(3):349–357Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ASTM C348–08 (2009) Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Atimtay E, Kanit R (2006) Learning seismic design from the earthquake itself. Practice periodical on structural design and construction 11(3):149–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bentur A, Mindess S (1990) Fiber reinforced cementitious composites. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 1–587Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Choi E, Nam TH, Cho BS (2005) A new concept of isolation bearings for highway steel bridges using shape memory alloys. Can J Civ Eng 32:957–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Czaderski C, Hahnebach B, Motavalli M (2006) RC beam with variable stiffness and strength. Constr Build Mater 20(9):824–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    DesRoches R, Delemont M (2002) Seismic retrofit of simply supported bridges using shape memory alloys. Eng Struct 24:325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dolce M, Cardone D, Palermo G (2007) Seismic Isolation of Bridges using Isolation Systems based on Flat Sliding Bearings. Bull Earthq Eng 5:491–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Elbahy YI, Youssef MA, Nehdi M (2008) Stress block parameters for concrete flexural members reinforced with superelastic shape memory alloys. Mater Struct 42:1335–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ghobarah A, Said A (2002) Shear strengthening of beam-column joints. Eng Struct 24:881–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hameed R, Duprat F, Turatsinze, A, Sellier A (2009) Mechanical properties of reinforced fibrous concrete beams under reverse cyclic loading. In: SBEIDCO, ENSET, Oran, Algeria, 12–14 October, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Janke L, Czaderski C, Motavalli M, Ruth J (2005) Applications of shape memory alloys in civil engineering structures—overview, limits and new ideas. Mater Struct 38:578–592Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    JCI-S-002 (2003) Method of test for load-displacement curve of fiber reinforced concrete by use of notched beam. JCI Standards for test of FRC, Tokyo, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kuang SJ, Baczkowski JB (2009) Steel-fibre-reinforced concrete coupling beams subjected to monotonic loading. Mag Concr Res 61(1):35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu M, Li H, Song G, Ou J (2007) Investigation of vibration mitigation of stay cables incorporated with superelastic shape memory alloy dampers. Smart Mater Struct 16:2202–2213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Opara KN, Naaman EA (2000) Self-stressing fiber composites. ACI Struct J 97(2):335–345Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Park R, Paulay T (1975) Reinforced concrete structure. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Parra-Montesinos JG (2005) High-performance fiber-reinforced cement composites: an alternative for seismic design of structures. ACI Struct J 102(5):668–675Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rao GA, Rao AS (2009) Toughness indices of steel fiber reinforced concrete under mode II loading. Mater Struct 42:1173–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shaheen E, Shrive GN (2007) Cyclic loading and fracture mechanics of Ductal concrete. Int J Fract 148:251–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shajil N, Das D, Chandrasekaran L (2009) Effects of cycling on the pseudoelastic properties of CuAlMnNi & NiTi based pseudoelastic alloys. Int J Struct Changes Solids 1:171–185Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shajil N, Srinivasan SM, Santhanam M (2013) Self-centering of shape memory alloy fiber reinforced cement mortar members subjected to strong cyclic loading. Mater Struct 46:651–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Song G, Ma N, Li NH (2006) Applications of shape memory alloys in civil structures. Eng Struct 28:1266–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ward JR, Li VC (1991) Dependence of flexural behaviour of fibre reinforced mortar on material fracture resistance and beam size. Constr Build Mater 5(3):151–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wilde K, Gardoni P, Fujimo Y (2000) Base isolation system with shape memory alloy device for elevated bridges. Eng Struct 22:222–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology MadrasChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Applied MechanicsIIT MadrasChennaiIndia
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringIIT MadrasChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations