Advertisement

Materials and Structures

, Volume 47, Issue 12, pp 2081–2100 | Cite as

Mechanical behaviour of FRP-confined masonry by testing of full-scale columns

  • F. Micelli
  • M. Di Ludovico
  • A. Balsamo
  • G. Manfredi
Original Article

Abstract

The vulnerability of masonry constructions under seismic forces, or more generally under the mechanical actions during the centuries, has been highlighted in the last years by several events that caused the loss of significant heritage buildings. Faced with this difficulty, the use of composite materials, fiber reinforced polymers (FRP) may be a solution for mitigating the vulnerability of masonry buildings. This solution has been tested in the laboratory by researchers in the last decade. In particular, studies regarding elements such as walls, arches and vaults, strengthened with FRP materials are available. A few numbers of studies are known for columns, which have been tested only as small or middle scale samples. The current state of the art does not report studies on FRP-confined masonry columns tested in real scale. The research presents the results of an experimental program performed on full-scale masonry columns strengthened with different composite systems. The same kind of study had been previously performed by the authors on medium scale masonry columns, using the same materials for both the masonry core and for the FRP system. Prismatic columns with a square cross section were subjected to compression tests according to the following test schemes: two control unconfined columns; column with continuous wrapping by using unidirectional glass FRP (GFRP) sheets; column with discontinuous wrapping by using GFRP unidirectional sheets; column with continuous GFRP wrapping and internal carbon FRP bars bonded in the transverse directions; column wrapped with continuous alkali resistant GFRP grid and steel spikes bonded together in lime based matrix. The experimental results are presented and discussed in the paper along with the comparison with the results obtained from the experimental tests on medium scale specimens. The comparison between experimental data and theoretical predictions provided by the analytical model found in the guidelines of the CNR technical document is also illustrated.

Keywords

Masonry Columns Confinement Experimental tests Real scale 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was performed in the framework of PE 2010–2013; joint program DPC-ReLUIS. The materials used for strengthening the specimens discussed in this paper have been provided by Mapei, Spa, Milan.

References

  1. 1.
    fib TG 9.6 (2001) Externally bonded FRP reinforcement for RC structures. Technical report 138Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ACI TC 400 (2002) Design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures—ACI 440.2R.02, 45Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Japan Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE) (2001) Recommendations for upgrading of concrete structures with use of continuous fiber sheets. In: Maruyama K (ed) Concrete engineering series 41Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    CNR-DT 200 R1 (2012) Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening existing structures. Italian Council of Research (CNR), Rome, pp 1–167Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Samaan M, Mirmiran A, Shahawy M (1998) Model of concrete confined with fiber composites. ASCE—J Struct Eng 124(9):1025–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spoelstra MJ, Monti G (1999) FRP-confined concrete model. ASCE-J Compos Constr 3(3):143–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Toutanji HA (1999) Stress–strain characteristics of concrete columns externally confined with advanced fiber composites sheets. ACI Mater J 96(3):397–404Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lam L, Teng JG (2002) Strength models for fiber-reinforced plastic confined concrete. J Struct Eng ASCE 128(5):612–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Lorenzis L, Tepfers R (2003) Comparative study of models on confinement of concrete cylinders with fiber-reinforced polymer composites. ASCE-J Compos Constr 7(3):219–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deniaud C, Neale KW (2006) An assessment of constitutive models for concrete columns confined with fibre composite sheets. Compos Struct 73(3):318–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Di Ludovico M, Prota A, Manfredi G (2010) Structural upgrade using basalt fibers for concrete confinement. ASCE J Compos Constr 14(5):541–552 (ISSN: 1090-0268)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Di Ludovico M, D’Ambra C, Prota A, Manfredi G (2010) FRP confinement of tuff and clay brick columns: experimental study and assessment of analytical models. ASCE—J Compos Constr 14(5):583–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shrive NG, Masia MJ, Lissel SL (2001) Strengthening and rehabilitation of masonry using fibre reinforced polymers. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international seminar on historical constructions, Guimarães, Portugal, pp 1047–1056Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Masia MJ, Shrive NG (2003) CFRP wrapping for the rehabilitation of masonry columns. Can J Civ Eng 30(4):734–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Micelli F, De Lorenzis L, La Tegola A (2004) FRP-confined masonry columns under axial loads: analytical model and experimental results. Br Masonry Soc—Masonry Int 17:3:95–108Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Micelli F, De Lorenzis L, Galati N, La Tegola A (2001) Confinement of natural block masonry columns using fibre reinforced polymer rebars and laminates. In: Proceedings of the 9th Canadian masonry symposium, Fredericton, Canada, 4–6 June 2001Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Micelli F, De Lorenzis L, La Tegola A, (2003) Confinement of masonry columns with FRP bars. In: Proceedings of Composites in Construction CCC2003 International Conference, Cosenza, Italy, 16–19 Sept 2003, pp 373–378Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Faella C, Martinelli E, Paciello S, Nigro E (2004) Experimental tests and theoretical models on tuff masonry bricks and columns confined with C-FRP sheets, vol. 2. In: Proceedings of IMTCR04 international conference, Lecce, Italy, 6–9 June, pp 343–359Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barbi L, Briccoli Bati S, Ranocchiai G (2004) Experimental analysis of brickwork specimens confined with CFRP composites. In: Proceedings of the 2nd national symposium on mechanics of masonry structures strengthened with FRP materials, 2004, Venice, Italy, pp 217–225Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Borri A, Grazini A, (2004) Masonry columns strengthening with FRP materials. In: Proceedings of the 2nd national symposium on mechanics of masonry structures strengthened with FRP materials, 2004, Venice, Italy, pp 193–202Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shaheen E, Shrive NG (2005) Sprayed glass fibre reinforced polymer (SGFRP) masonry columns under concentric and eccentric loading. Can J Civ Eng 34(11):1495–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shaheen E, Shrive NG (2005) Strengthening of masonry columns with sprayed glass fibre reinforced polymers (SGFRP). In: Proceedings of the 10th Canadian masonry symposium, Banff, Alberta, Canada, pp 873–882Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aiello MA, Micelli F, Valente L (2005) Circular masonry columns confined with FRP. In: Proceedings of composites in construction CCC2005, 3rd International Conference, Lyon, France, 11–13 July 2005, pp 485–492Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aiello MA, Micelli F, Valente L (2007) Structural upgrading of masonry columns by using composite reinforcements. ASCE J Compos Constr 11(6):650–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Krevaikas TD, Triantafillou T (2006) Masonry confinement with fiber-reinforced polymers. ASCE J Compos Constr 9(2):128–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shrive NG (2006) The use of fibre reinforced polymers to improve seismic resistance of masonry. Constr Build Mater 20(4):269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Corradi M, Grazini A, Borri A (2007) Confinement of brick masonry columns with CFRP materials. Compos Sci Technol 67:1772–1783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aiello MA, Micelli F, Valente L (2009) FRP-confinement of square masonry columns. ASCE J Compos Constr 13(2):148–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Faella C, Martinelli E, Paciello S, Camorani G, Aiello MA, Micelli F, Nigro E (2011) Masonry columns confined by composite materials: experimental investigation. Composites: Part B 42(4):692–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Faella C, Martinelli E, Paciello S, Camorani G, Aiello MA, Micelli F, Nigro E (2011) Masonry columns confined by composite materials: design formulae. Composites: Part B 42(4):705–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione, European Committee for Standardization (2002) Tests guidelines for masonry members—compressive strength. UNI EN 772-1, MilanGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione, European Committee for Standardization (2004) Specification for mortar for masonry—masonry mortar. UNI EN 998-2, MilanGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    ASTM (2000) Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. D3039/D3039M, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    CNR-DT 203 (2006) Guide for the design and construction of concrete structures reinforced with fiber-reinforced polymer bars. Italian Council of Research (CNR), Rome, pp 1–35Google Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Micelli
    • 1
  • M. Di Ludovico
    • 2
  • A. Balsamo
    • 2
  • G. Manfredi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Innovation EngineeringUniversity of SalentoLecceItaly
  2. 2.Department of Structures for Engineering and ArchitectureUniversity of Naples Federico IINaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations