Materials and Structures

, Volume 48, Issue 8, pp 2447–2454 | Cite as

Correlation between dynamic mechanical thermo-analysis and composition-based models for C-S-H in hydrated portland cement paste

  • P. Pourbeik
  • J. J. Beaudoin
  • R. Alizadeh
  • L. Raki
Original Article

Abstract

A dynamic mechanical analysis (DMTA) technique was used to assess the mechanical performance of 1.4 nm tobermorite (T), jennite (J) and mixtures of tobermorite and jennite and tobermorite and calcium hydroxide (CH). A comparison of E′ (storage modulus) and tan∂ (internal friction) versus temperature curves for compacted solid bodies of these mineral systems with corresponding curves for cement paste hydrated for 2 month and 3 years (both referred to as ‘young’) and 45-year-old paste (referred to as ‘old’) was made. Original data was provided to assess the practical validity of the Richardson–Groves composition-based models for the C-S-H in cement paste. Differences in mechanical performance between the ‘young’ paste and the ‘old’ paste could be accounted for by application of a T/J dominant model (‘young’ paste) and a J–T/CH structural model with a minor amount of T (‘old paste’).

Keywords

Dynamic mechanical thermo-analysis Cement paste C-S-H Tobermorite Jennite 

References

  1. 1.
    Taylor HFW (1997) Hydration of the calcium silicate phases, cement chemistry, chapter 5. Thomas Telford Publishing, London, p 459Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Richardson IG (2004) Tobermorite/jennite- and tobermorite/calcium hydroxide-based models for the structure of C-S-H: applicability to hardened pastes of tricalcium silicate, β-dicalcium silicate, Portland cement, and blends of Portland cement with blast-furnace slag, metakaolin, or silica fume. Cem Concr Res 34:1733–1777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Taylor HFW (1986) Proposed structure of calcium silicate hydrate gel. J Am Ceram Soc 69(6):464–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Richardson IG (2008) The calcium silicate hydrates. Cem Concr Res 38(2):137–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Richardson IG, Groves GW (1992) Models for the composition and structure of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) gel in hardened tricalcium silicate pastes. Cem Concr Res 22:1001–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Taylor HFW (1993) Nanostructure of C-S-H: current status. Adv Cem Based Mater 1:38–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen JJ, Thomas JJ, Taylor HFW, Jennings HM (2004) Solubility and structure of calcium silicate hydrate. Cem Concr Res 34:1499–1519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grutzek MW (1999) A new model for the formation of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H). Mater Res Innov 3:160–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Powers TC, Brownyard TL (1946) Studies of the physical properties of hardened Portland cement paste: part 3. Theoretical interpretation of adsorption data. J Am Concr Inst 43:469–504Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Radjy F, Sellevold EJ (1973) Internal friction peaks due to adsorbed and capillary water in microporous substances. Nat Phys Sci 241:133–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Radjy F, Richards CW (1973) Effect of curing and heat treatment history on the dynamic mechanical response and the pore structure of hardened cement paste. Cem Concr Res 3:7–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sellevold EJ, Radjy F (1976) Drying and resaturation effects on internal friction in hardened cement paste. J Am Ceram Soc 59(5–6):256–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Radjy F, Sellevold EJ, Richards CW (1972) Effect of freezing on the dynamic mechanical response of hardened cement paste down to −60 °C. Cem Concr Res 2:697–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alizadeh R (2009) Nanostructure and engineering properties of basic and modified calcium-silicate-hydrate systems. PhD thesis, University of Ottawa, p 230Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yu P, Kirkpatrick RJ (1999) Thermal dehydration of tobermorite and jennite. Concr Sci Eng 1:185–191Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gard JA, Taylor HFW (1976) Calcium silicate hydrate (II) (“C-S-H(II)”). Cem Concr Res 6:667–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hara N, Inoue N (1980) Formation of jennite from fumed silica. Cem Concr Res 10:677–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Soroka I, Sereda PJ (1968) The structure of cement–stone and use of compacts as structural models. Proc. 5th Int. Symp. on the Chem. of Cem., vol 3. Tokyo, pp 67–73Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Feldman RF (1972) Factors affecting the Young’s modulus-porosity relation of hydrated Portland cement compacts. Cem Concr Res 2(4):375–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sereda PJ, Feldman RF (1963) Compacts of powdered material as porous bodies for use in sorption studies. J Appl Chem 13:150–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Beaudoin JJ (1983) Comparison of mechanical properties of compacted calcium hydroxide and Portland cement paste systems. Cem Concr Res 13:319–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sereda PJ, Feldman RF, Swenson EG (1966) Effect of sorbed water on some mechanical properties of hydrated Portland cement pastes and compacts, Highway Research Board, Special Report 90, pp 58–73Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Menard KP (1999) Dynamic mechanical analysis—a practical introduction. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, p 208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Alizadeh R, Beaudoin JJ, Raki L (2011) Mechanical properties of calcium silicate hydrates. Mater Struct 44:13–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pourbeik P, Beaudoin JJ, Alizadeh R, Raki L (2013) Mechanical property–porosity relationships of layered calcium silicate hydrate phases. Mater Struct 46(9):1489–1495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pourbeik P, Beaudoin JJ, Alizadeh R, Raki L (2013) Dynamic mechanical thermo-analysis of layered calcium-silicate hydrates, Submitted to J Therm Anal CalorimGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Pourbeik
    • 1
  • J. J. Beaudoin
    • 2
  • R. Alizadeh
    • 3
  • L. Raki
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.National Research Council Canada, Construction PortfolioOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Giatec Scientific IncOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations