Advertisement

Materials and Structures

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 1061–1073 | Cite as

Prediction of unconfined compressive strength of pulverized fuel ash–cement–sand mixture

Original Article

Abstract

Recently, ground improvement has become much more feasible. Chemical stabilization is a quick and affordable approach to enhancing soil characteristics. An important avenue of research is discovering alternative materials for use in soil enhancement. Pulverized fuel ash (PFA), which is a waste byproduct of coal power plants, has been shown to reduce the environmental risks and costs involved in construction. In this study, a series of unconfined compressive tests were performed for various mixtures of cement, PFA, and sand; the tests considered both the curing period and the optimum moisture content (OMC). In addition, multiple variable linear regression was used to analyze laboratory data in order to obtain an empirical relationship that can be used to predict the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of a PFA–cement–sand mixture. The accuracy of the model was verified using statistical indices. The first objective of this study was to assess the effects of PFA content on the UCS of the mixture. The second was to investigate the impact of the OMC on the UCS. The focal point of this study was its derivation of a relationship that can be used to estimate the UCS on the basis of existing variables. The results indicated that PFA can strengthen sand in terms of the UCS and that excessive PFA in a mixture may adversely affect the UCS of a medium. Therefore, a mixture must have an optimum proportion of compounds. The OMC plays a vital role in enhancing UCS. The UCS of different mixtures can be predicted with an acceptable level of accuracy by using the relationship derived in this study.

Keywords

Pulverized fuel ash Ground improvement Unconfined compressive strength Multiple linear regression Enhancement Admixture 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful for the valuable comments and suggestions of the reviewers. The authors express their sincere thanks for the funding support they received from HIR-MOHE University of Malaya under Grant No. UM.C/HIR/MOHE/ENG/34. This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (No. NRF-2013R1A1A1060052). They also express their warm gratitude to the IEOS at the University of Malaya for their help in providing facilities.

References

  1. 1.
    Bergen SD, Bolton SM, Fridley JL (2001) Design principles for ecological engineering. Ecol Eng 18:201–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Terashi M, Juran I (2000) Ground improvement—state of the art. GeoEng 2000. Technomic, Lancaster, pp 461–519Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Castro J, Sagaseta C (2011) Deformation and consolidation around encased stone columns. Geotext Geomembr 29:268–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gue SS, Tan YC (20005) Chapter 23: failures of ground improvement works in soft ground. In: Indraratna B, Chu J, (eds) Ground improvement—case histories. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 665–680Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ea Basha, Hashim R, Mahmud HB, Muntohar aS (2005) Stabilization of residual soil with rice husk ash and cement. Constr Build Mater 19:448–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Larsson S (2005) State of practice report—execution, monitoring and quality control. In: Proceedings of the international conference on deep mixing, best practice and recent advances. Stockholm, pp 732–786Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vories KC, Throgmorton D (2000) Proceedings of the use and disposal of coal combustion by-products at coal mines: a technical interactive forum at the US Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Morgantown: US Department of Interior, Office of Surface MiningGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prabakar J, Dendorkar N, Morchhale R (2004) Influence of fly ash on strength behavior of typical soils. Constr Build Mater 18(4):263–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guleria SP (2011) Unconfined compressive strength of fly ash-lime-gypsum composite mixed with treated tire chips. J Mater Civ Eng 23(8):1255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pone JDN, Hein Kaa, Stracher GB, Annegarn HJ, Finkleman RB, Blake DR et al (2007) The spontaneous combustion of coal and its by-products in the Witbank and Sasolburg coalfields of South Africa. Int J Coal Geol 72:124–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tick HO (2010) Carbon capture and storage potential in coal-fired plant in Malaysia—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14(9):2697–2709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Okyay US, Dias D (2010) Use of lime and cement treated soils as pile supported load transfer platform. Eng Geol 114:34–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim B, Prezzi M, Salgado R (2005) Geotechnical properties of fly and bottom ash mixtures for use in highway embankments. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131:914–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang Y, Bird RN, Heidrich O (2007) A review of the use of recycled solid waste materials in asphalt pavements. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:58–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Naik TR, Singh SS, Hossain MM (1995) Abrasion resistance of high-strength concrete made with class C fly ash. ACI Mater J 92:649–659Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Siddique R (2003) Effect of fine aggregate replacement with Class F fly ash on the mechanical properties of concrete. Cem Concr Res 33:539–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Janz M, Johansson SE. The function of different binding agents in deep stabilization. Report 9. Swedish Deep Stabilization Research Center, Linkoping: SGI. Linkoping, Sweden2002Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    ASTM C (2008) Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. Annual Book of ASTM Standards: American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cokca E, Çokça E (2001) Use of class C Fly ashes for the stabilization of an expansive soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127:568–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nalbantoğlu Z, Nalbantoğlu Z (2004) Effectiveness of class C fly ash as an expansive soil stabilizer. Constr Build Mater 18:377–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang M, Javadi A, Min X (2006) Triaxial tests of sand reinforced with 3D inclusions. Geotext Geomembr 24:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bakharev T (2005) Geopolymeric materials prepared using class F fly ash and elevated temperature curing. Cem Concr Res 35:1224–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xie Z, Xi Y (2001) Hardening mechanisms of an alkaline-activated class F fly ash. Cem Concr Res 31:1245–1249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bouzoubaa N, Lachemi M (2001) Self-compacting concrete incorporating high volumes of class F fly ash: preliminary results. Cem Concr Res 31:413–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    LaRosa JL, Kwan S, Grutzeck MW (1992) Zeolite formation in class F fly ash blended cement pastes. J Am Ceram Soc 75:1574–1580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sezer A, Inan G, Yilmaz H, Ramyar K (2006) Utilization of a very high lime fly ash for improvement of Izmir clay. Build Environ 41(2):150–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Poon CS, Boost M (1996) The stabilization of sewage sludge by pulverized fuel ash and related materials. Environ Int 22:705–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Asavapisit S, Chotklang D (2004) Solidification of electroplating sludge using alkali-activated pulverized fuel ash as cementitious binder. Cem Concr Res 34:349–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Goodarzi F (2006) Characteristics and composition of fly ash from Canadian coal-fired power plants. Fuel 85:1418–1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fraay ALA, Bijen JM, de Haan YM (1989) The reaction of fly ash in concrete a critical examination. Cem Concr Res 19(2):235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yoon YW, Cheon SH, Kang DS (2004) Bearing capacity and settlement of tire-reinforced sands. Geotext Geomembr 22:439–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jo AN, Hafez MA, Norbaya S (2011) Study of bearing capacity of lime–cement columns with pulverized fuel ash for soil stabilization using laboratory model. Electr J Geotech Eng 16:1595–1605Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Demir I, Hughes RE, DeMaris PJ (2001) Formation and use of coal combustion residues from three types of power plants burning Illinois coals. Fuel 80:1659–1673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    ASTM (2004). Standard practice for characterizing fly ash for use in soil stabilization. D5239Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wayne G, Iwabuchi J, Shaffie R (1989) Influence of cementation on liquefaction of sands. J Geotech Eng 115(8):1102–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kolias S, Kasselouri-Rigopoulou V, Karahalios A (2005) Stabilisation of clayey soils with high calcium fly ash and cement. Cem Concr Compos 27(2):301–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stevens J (1982) Unified soil classification system. Civ Eng ASCE 52(12):61–62Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Devore JL (2011) Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences. Thomson Brooks/Cole, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chatterjee S, Hadi AS (2006) Regression analysis by example. Wiley, New York, p 607Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Openshaw S (1992) Utilization of coal fly ash. M.Sc Thesis, Florida University, p 36Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Snelson DG, Kinuthia JM, Davies PA, Chang SR (2009) Sustainable construction: composite use of tyres and ash in concrete. Waste Manag 29:360–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Larsen T (1985) Use of fly ash in structural concrete. In: Florida in seminar proceedings: fly ash in highway construction, Demonstration Project No. 59, November 1985, U.S. Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration, NTIS: PB86186079XSP.1985Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Camilleri J, Sammut M, Montesin FE (2006) Utilization of pulverized fuel ash in Malta. Waste Manag 26:853–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Theodorsson E (1988) BASIC computer program to summarize data using nonparametric and parametric statistics including Anderson–Darling test for normality. Comput Methods Progr Biomed 26(2):207–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kamps U (1995) A concept of generalized order statistics. J Stat Plan Inference 48(1):1–23CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vining G, Kowalski S (2010) Statistical methods for engineers. Duxbury Press, Pacific GroveGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringInha UniversityIncheonKorea

Personalised recommendations