Materials and Structures

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 1043–1059 | Cite as

Evaluation of the predictive ability of the in situ concrete strength through core drilling and its effects on the capacity of the RC columns

Original Article

Abstract

Assessment of seismic performance of existing RC buildings is a difficult work. The concrete mechanical characteristics have a crucial role on the seismic performance of the buildings during a strong earthquake. The core test has become the most effective method to estimate directly the in situ compressive strength of concrete. Then, some non-destructive tests (NDT) can be effectively used by setting reliable relationships with the core test results. In the past years, the core drilling has been widely studied. Many design codes or guidelines provide useful indication about the operative procedures in order to get no damaged samples. On the contrary, poor reference are available about the effects of core drilling on RC structure capacity. It should be remembered that, due to the increasing demand of utilization and rehabilitation of existing RC buildings, procedures in the evaluation and experimental tests on the constituent materials of these buildings should be improved. In fact, in poor quality concrete, the use of coring test method should take into account the potential negative impact on the safety of these structures. The peculiarities of this work are two: (1) the selection of samples and (2) the type of test. RC columns extracted from an existing old structure designed only for gravity loads have been considered and loading–unloading compression tests have been carried out on specimens. To this end, a wide description of the samples and their characterization has been considered as a fundamental step in order to properly design the experimental campaign. NDT, core drilling and subsequent test have been carried out on RC columns extracted from an existing building. Monotonic loading-unloading compression tests on column specimens have been carried out. Comparison of test results highlights the effect on the strength of structural elements of core drilling and subsequent restoration.

Keywords

In situ concrete strength Concrete drilling test Destructive tests Non-destructive tests Monotonic loading–unloading compression tests Existing RC buildings 

References

  1. 1.
    Braga F, Manfredi V, Masi A, Salvatori A, Vona M (2011) Performance of non-structural elements in RC buildings during the L’Aquila, 2009 earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng 9:307–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mucciarelli M, Bianca M, Ditommaso R, Gallipoli MR, Masi A, Milkereit C, Parolai S, Picozzi M, Vona M (2011) Far field damage on RC buildings: the case study of Navelli during the L’Aquila (Italy) seismic sequence, 2009. Bull Earthq Eng 9:263–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mucciarelli M, Masi A, Gallipoli MR, Harabaglia P, Vona M, Ponzo F, Dolce M (2004) Analysis of RC building dynamic response and soil-building resonance on data recorded during a damaging earthquake (Molise, Italy, 2002). Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(5):1943–1953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2000) FEMA 356—prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE) (2006) Assessment and improvement of the structural performance of buildings in earthquakes. Recommendations of a NZSEE Study Group on Earthquake Risk BuildingsGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Italian Ministry of Infrastructure (2008) Decree 2008/01/14. Nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioniGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    American Concrete Institute (ACI) (1998) Nondestructive test methods for evaluation of concrete in structures. ACI 228.2R-98, DetroitGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    CEB (1997) Bulletin d’information N. 239. Safety Evaluation and MonitoringGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    RILEM (1993) NDT 4. Recommendations for in situ concrete strength determination by combined non-destructive methods. Compendium of RILEN Technical Recommendations. E&FN Spon, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bungey J (1979) Determining concrete strength by using small-diameter cores. Mag Concr Res 31(107):91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Calavera I, Aparicio G, Delibes A, Gonzales C (1979) Effects of cores from coring test and bore filling on column behaviour. Quality control of concrete structures, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ramirez JL, Barcena FM (1974) Relacion entre la resistencia de hormigon de las estructuras y la obtenida mediante ensayo de probetas testigo extraidas por corte. Congreso de la AE para el CQ, BarcellonaGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bartlett M, MacGregor J (1994) Effect of core diameter on concrete core strengths. ACI Mater J 91(5):460–470Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bartlett M, MacGregor J (1994) Effect of moisture condition on concrete core strengths. ACI Mater J 91(3):227–236Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bartlett M, MacGregor J (1994) Effect of core length-to-diameter ratio on concrete core strengths. ACI Mater J 91(4):339–348Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Campione G, Fossetti M, Mangiavillano ML, Priolo S (2008) Influenza del carotaggio sullo stato tensionale e deformativo di elementi compressi. Atti del Convegno Reluis Valutazione e riduzione della vulnerabilità sismica di edifici esistenti in CA, Roma (in Italian)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Campione G, Minafò G (2011) Experimental investigation on compressive behavior of bottle-shaped struts. ACI Struct J 108(3):294–303Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Minafò G (2012) Load-carrying capacity of axially-loaded RC members with circular openings. Eng Struct 41:136–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhu L, Xu Q, Li X, Zhu C (2010) Experimental study of RC column capacity affect by core drilling. 7th International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historic Constructions, SAHC; Shanghai; 6 October 2010 through 8 October 2010; Code 83167. Adv Mater Res 133–134:1195–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    CEN (2005) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings (draft N 6). EN 1998-3, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Masi A, Vona M (2009) Estimation of the In-situ concrete strength: provisions of the European and Italian seismic codes and possible improvements. Convegno Finale del Progetto ReLUIS-DPC 2005–2008, NaplesGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dolce M, Masi A, Ferrini M (2006) Estimation of the actual in-place concrete strength in assessing existing RC structures. In: The second international fib congress, Naples, 5–8 June 2006Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jalayer F, Petruzzelli F, Iervolino I, Manfredi G (2010) Optimal programming of in-situ tests and inspections for existing buildings. In: 14th European conference on earthquake engineering, Ohrid, Republic of MacedoniaGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kheder GF (1999) A two stage procedure for assessment of in situ concrete strength using combined non-destructive testing. Mater Struct 32:410–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Indelicato F (1999) In-place compressive strength of concrete: statistical methods to evaluate experimental data. Mater Struct 32:394–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tuncan M, Arioz O, Ramyar K, Karasu B (2008) Assessing concrete strength by means of small diameter cores. Constr Build Mater 22:981–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Masi A, Dolce M, Vona M, Ferrini M, Pace G (2007) Indagini sperimentali su elementi strutturali estratti da una scuola esistente in CA. In: ANIDIS 2007 XII Convegno Nazionale l’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia, Pisa (in Italian)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Masi A, Santarsiero G, Moroni C, Nigro D, Dolce M, Russo G, Pauletta M, Realfonzo R, Faella C, Lignola GP, Manfredi G, Prota A, Verderame GM (2008) Behaviour and strengthening of RC beam-column joints: experimental program and first results of the research activity in the framework of DPC-RELUIS project (research line 2). In: The 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    UNI EN 12504-1 (2002) Prove sul calcestruzzo nelle strutture—Carote—Prelievo, esame e prove di compressioneGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    UNI EN 12504-2 (2001) Prove sul calcestruzzo nelle strutture—Prove non distruttive—Determinazione indice sclerometricoGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    UNI EN 12504-4 (2005) Prove sul calcestruzzo nelle strutture—Parte 4: Determinazione della velocità di propagazione degli impulsi ultrasoniciGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vona M (2013) A review of experimental results about in situ concrete strength. Adv Mater Res 773:278–282. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.773.278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    CEN (2004) Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures—part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings. EN 1992-1-1:2004, BrusselsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EngineeringUniversity of BasilicataPotenzaItaly

Personalised recommendations