Materials and Structures

, Volume 47, Issue 10, pp 1761–1771 | Cite as

Unusual water transport properties of some traditional Scottish shale bricks

  • Isobel M. Griffin
  • Christopher Hall
  • Andrea Hamilton
Original Article


Sorptivity, porosity and pore size distribution have been measured for five types of pressed fired-clay bricks recovered from a Second World War airfield in East Lothian, Scotland. It was found that the bricks, all manufactured locally from colliery shale, had similar porosities but significantly different compositions, leading to differences in pore structure and transport properties. Unusually high concentrations of organic carbon were found by analysis. In imbibition tests using water and n-decane, capillary absorption generally did not scale with time1/2, indicating material non-uniformity in the flow direction. A sharp front n-layer model was used to estimate the variation of sorptivity and permeability in drilled cores taken through bed and stretcher faces. A surface skin of lower sorptivity was found in some materials. This is attributed to compression of the green clay in the brick mould during manufacture. Comparison of water and decane imbibition showed that water sorptivity is reduced throughout by partial wettability. This hydrophobicity of these shale bricks is tentatively related to their high organic carbon content, which is incompletely burned out during firing. We show how the partial wettability may be expressed in terms of a wetting index derived from imbibition data.


Fired-clay brick Sorptivity Water flow in heterogeneous materials 



This work was undertaken as part of a PhD project (IMG) funded by the UK AHRC and EPSRC through the Science and Heritage programme.


  1. 1.
    Lawson EM, Nixon PJ (1978) A survey of the locations, disposal and prospective uses of the major industrial by-products and waste materials in Scotland. Current Paper 50/78, Building Research Eastablishment, GarstonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lawson EM, Nixon PJ (1979) Prospective uses of Scotland’s by-products. Ceram Ind J 88:21–23Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gutt W, Nixon PJ (1979) Use of waste materials in the construction industry. Mat Struct 12: 255–306Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Douglas GJ, Oglethorpe MK (1993) Brick, tile and fireclay industries in Scotland. Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    British Geological Survey (2005) Brick clay. Mineral Planning Factsheet, BGSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hall C (1996) Clay brick. In: Jackson N, Dhir RK (eds) Civil engineering materials, 5th edn. Palgrave, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Douglas GJ, Hume JR, Moir L, Oglethorpe MK (1985) A survey of Scottish brickmarks. Scottish Industrial Archaeology Survey, University of Strathclyde, GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haibin L, Zhenling L (2010) Recycling utilization patterns of coal mining waste in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:1331–1340Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hyun J-Y, Jeong S-B, Chae Y-B, Kim B-S (2006) Development of fired clay bricks by coal-preparation refuse. J Ceram Soc Jpn 114:404–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hall C, Hoff WD (2012) Water transport in brick, stone and concrete, 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hall C, Hoff WD (2007) Rising damp: capillary rise dynamics in walls. Proc R Soc A 463:1871–1884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hall C, Hamilton A, Hoff WD, Viles HA, Eklund JE (2011) Moisture dynamics of walls: response to microenvironment and climate change. Proc R Soc A 467:194–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Derluyn H, Janssen H, Carmeliet J (2011) Influence of the nature of interfaces on the capillary transport in layered materials. Constr Build Mater 25:3685–3693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Blocken B, Carmeliet J (2012) A simplified numerical model for rainwater runoff on building facades: possibilities and limitations. Build Environ 53:59–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Air Ministry (1997) The Royal Air Force builds for war: a history of design and construction in the RAF, 1935–1945. Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Francis P (1996) British military airfield architecture. Patrick Stephens, SparkfordGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    Gummerson RJ, Hall C, Hoff WD (1980) Water movement in porous building materials—II. Hydraulic suction and sorptivity of brick and other masonry materials. Build Environ 15:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dunham AC (1992) Developments in industrial mineralogy: I. The mineralogy of brick-making. Proc Yorkshire Geol Soc 49:95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dunham AC, McKnight AS, Warren I (2001) Mineral assemblages formed in Oxford Clay fired under different time-temperature conditions with reference to brick manufacture. Proc Yorkshire Geol Soc 53:221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nicholson PS, Ross WA (1970) Kinetics of oxidation of natural organic material in clays. J Am Ceram Soc 53:154–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aligizaki KK (2006) Pore structure of cement-based materials. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hall C, Hoff WD, Prout W (1992) Sorptivity–porosity relations in clay brick ceramic. Am Ceram Soc Bull 71:1112–1116Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hall C (2006) Anomalous diffusion in unsaturated flow—fact or fiction? Cem Concr Res 37:378–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hall C, Green K, Hoff WD, Wilson MA (1996) A sharp wet front analysis of capillary absorption into n-layer composite. J Phys D Appl Phys 29:2947–2950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Beltrán V, Escardino A, Feliu C, Rodrigo MD (1988) Liquid suction by porous ceramic materials. Br Ceram Trans J 87:64–69Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Beltrán V, Barba A, Jarque JC, Escardino A (1991) Liquid suction by porous ceramic materials: 3—Influence of the nature of the composition and the preparation method of the pressing powder. Br Ceram Trans J 90:77–80Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ioannou I, Hoff WD, Hall C (2004) On the role of organic adlayers in the anomalous water sorptivity of Lépine limestone. J Colloid Interface Sci 279:228–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Krakowiak KJ, Lourenço PB, Ulm F-J (2011) Multitechnique investigation of extruded clay brick microstructure. J Am Ceram Soc 94:3012–3022Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ince C, Carter MA, Wilson MA, El-Turki A, Ball RJ, Allen GC, Collier NC (2010) Analysis of the abstraction of water from freshly mixed jointing mortars in masonry construction. Mater Struct 43:985–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cultrone G, Sebastián E, Elert K, de la Torre MJ, Cazalla O, Rodriguez-Navarro C (2004) Influence of mineralogy and firing temperature on the porosity of bricks. J Eur Ceram Soc 24:547–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isobel M. Griffin
    • 1
  • Christopher Hall
    • 1
  • Andrea Hamilton
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of EngineeringUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations