Materials and Structures

, Volume 47, Issue 6, pp 987–997 | Cite as

Modeling and analysis of laminated rubber bearings under axial tensile loading

  • S. C. Chen
  • X. K. Tian
  • W. M. Yan
  • Kang-Suk Kim
Original Article

Abstract

To analyze the tension performance of laminated rubber bearings under tensile loading, a tension model for analyzing the rubber layers is proposed based on the theory of elasticity. Applying the boundary restraint condition and the assumption of incompressibility of the rubber layers, stress and deformation expressions for the tensile rubber layers are derived. Based on the derived expressions, the stress distribution and deformed pattern specifically for deformed shape of the free edges of rubber layers are analyzed, and the theory of cracking energy is applied to analyze the distributions of predicted cracking energy density and gradient direction. Prediction of crack initiation and crack propagation direction of the rubber layers is investigated. The analytical results show that the stress and deformation expressions can be used to simulate the stress distribution and deformed pattern of the rubber layer for laminated rubber bearings in the elastic range, and the crack energy method for predicting the failure mechanism is feasible according to the experimental phenomenon.

Keywords

Laminated rubber bearing Isolation Deformation Tension model Tensile stress Finite-element method 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Zhang Zhiqian and Fan Chunyu for their support. This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation (50978009) and Beijing Science and Technology Foundation (KM201210005025).

References

  1. 1.
    Matsuda A (2004) Evaluation for mechanical properties of laminated rubber bearings using finite element analysis. J Press Vessel Technol 126:134–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benthem JP, Minderhoud P (1972) The problem of solid cylinder compressed between rough rigid stamps. Int J Solids Struct 8:1027–1042CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Takaoka E, Takenaka Y, Nimura A (2011) Shaking table test and analysis method on ultimate behavior of slender base-isolated structure supported by laminated rubber bearings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 40:551–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hino J, Yoshitomi S, Tsuji M (2008) Bound of aspect ratio of base-isolated buildings considering nonlinear tensile behavior of rubber bearing. Struct Eng Mech 30(3):351–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Imbimbo M, Luca AD (1998) FE stress analysis of rubber bearings under axial loads. Comput Struct 68:31–39CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yoshida J, Abe M, Fujino Y (2004) Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of high damping rubber bearings. J Eng Mech 130(5):607–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jain SK, Thakkar SK (2005) Experimental investigations on laminated rubber bearings. Bull Earthq Eng 3(1):129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kilar V, Koren D (2009) Seismic behavior of asymmetric base isolated structures with various distributions of isolators. Eng Struct 31(4):910–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ling Y, Engel PA, Brodsky WL (1995) Compression of bonded annular rubber blocks. J Eng Mech 121(6):661–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu WG, Yang QR, Zhou FL (2004) Nonlinear elastic rotation and shear property theoretical and experimental research of rubber isolators. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 24(2):158–167Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mars WV (2002) Cracking energy density as a predictor of fatigue life under multiaxial conditions. Rubber Chem Technol 75:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mosqueda G, Masroor A, Sanchez J, Ryan K (2010) Performance limit states of seismically Isolated buildings with elastomeric bearings. In: Proceedings from the 9th US National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Toronto, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Park SK, Han KB (2004) Effects of seismic isolation bearing with sliding mechanism on the response of bridge. Mater Struct 37:412–421Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sarno LD, Chioccarelli E, Cosenza E (2011) Seismic response analysis of an irregular base isolated building. Bull Earthq Eng 9:1673–1702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Warn GP, Whittaker AS (2008) Vertical stiffness of elastomeric and lead-rubber seismic isolation bearings. J Struct Eng 133(9):1227–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xu L, Wu GZ (1999) Some forms of strain energy function for rubber with finite element analysis. Rubber Ind 46(12):707–711Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xu ZL (2009) A concise course in elasticity. Higher Education Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang QR, Liu WG (2010) Tensile stiffness and deformation model of rubber isolators in tension and tension-shear states. J Eng Mech 136(4):429–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yoshitake M, Ichiro N, Ichizou K (2001) Tensile property of large-sized natural rubber bearing. AIJ J Technol 12:53–56Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang ZQ (2012) Tension property of laminated rubber bearings under tensile loading. Ph.D. Thesis, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. C. Chen
    • 1
  • X. K. Tian
    • 1
  • W. M. Yan
    • 1
  • Kang-Suk Kim
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringBeijing University of TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations