Materials and Structures

, Volume 46, Issue 7, pp 1133–1141 | Cite as

X-ray radiation shielding properties of cement mortars prepared with different types of aggregates

  • Tung-Chai Ling
  • Chi-Sun Poon
  • Wai-Shung Lam
  • Tai-Po Chan
  • Karl Ka-Lok Fung
Original Article

Abstract

The types of aggregate used play an important role in determining the effectiveness of X-ray radiation protection of cement mortars. Cement mortars were prepared using fine aggregates obtained from six different sources. The influence of aggregate type on X-ray shielding properties was studied. The results showed that mortars prepared with barite and lead-laden recycled cathode ray tube funnel glass provided better shielding properties than mortars prepared with natural sand, natural crushed fine stone or crushed beverage glass. This is attributed to the use of dense aggregates being able to interact with X-ray radiation, thus reducing the depth of penetration. Due to the superior shielding properties of the mortar containing barite, it can be used to replace traditional sand mortar for applications as rendering or plastering materials for the construction of medical diagnostic and CT scanner rooms.

Keywords

Cement mortar Radiation shielding Waste recycling Recycled aggregate Funnel glass 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Environment and Conservation Fund and the Woo Wheelock Greed Fund, and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University for funding support.

References

  1. 1.
    Akkurt I, Basyigit C, Kilincarslan S, Mavi B, Akkurt A (2006) Radiation shielding of concretes containing different aggregates. Cem Concr Compos 28(2):153–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Basyigit C, Akkurt I, Altindag R, Kilincarslan S, Akkurt A, Mavi B, Karaguzel R (2006) The effect of freezing–thawing (F–T) cycles on the radiation shielding properties of concretes. Build Environ 41(8):1070–1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gencel O, Brostow W, Ozel C, Filiz M (2010) Concretes containing hematite for use as shielding barriers. Mater Sci 16(3):249–256Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sakr K, El-Hakim E (2005) Effect of high temperature or fire on heavy weight concrete properties. Cem Concr Res 35(3):590–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miah MI (2004) Environmental gamma dose rates and influencing factors in buildings. Build Environ 39(7):847–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kharita MH, Yousef S, AlNassar M (2009) The effect of carbon powder addition on the properties of hematite radiation shielding concrete. Prog Nucl Energy 51(2):388–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kharita MH, Takeyeddin M, Alnassar M, Yousef S (2008) Development of special radiation shielding concretes using natural local materials and evaluation of their shielding characteristics. Prog Nucl Energy 50(1):33–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sakr K (2006) Effects of silica fume and rice husk on the properties of heavy weight concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 3(1):367–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Akkurt I, Akyıldırım H, Mavi B, Kilincarslan S, Basyigit C (2010) Radiation shielding of concrete containing zeolite. Radiat Meas 45(7):827–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ling TC, Poon CS (2011) Utilization of recycled glass derived from cathode ray tube glass as fine aggregate in cement mortar. J Hazard Mater 192(2):451–456MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee G, Ling TC, Wong YL, Poon CS (2011) Effects of crushed glass cullet sizes, casting methods and pozzolanic materials on ASR of concrete blocks. Constr Build Mater 25(5):2611–2618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ling TC, Poon CS (2012) A comparative study on the feasible use of recycled beverage and CRT funnel glass as fine aggregate in cement mortar. J Clean Prod 29–30:46–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ling TC, Poon CS (2012) Effects of particle size of treated CRT funnel glass on properties of cement mortar. Mater Struct. doi: 10.1617/s11527-012-9880-8 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ling TC, Poon CS (2011) Properties of architectural mortar prepared with recycled glass with different particle sizes. Mater Des 32(5):2675–2684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Esen Y, Yilmazer B (2010) Investigation of some physical and mechanical properties of concrete produced with barite aggregate. Sci Res Essays 5(24):3826–3833Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ling TC, Poon CS, Kou SC (2011) Feasibility of using recycled glass in architectural cement mortars. Cem Concr Compos 33(8):848–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Okkalides D (1999) Assessment of radiology installations in Macedonia, Greece. Eur J Radiol 12(3):177–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tung-Chai Ling
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chi-Sun Poon
    • 1
  • Wai-Shung Lam
    • 1
  • Tai-Po Chan
    • 3
  • Karl Ka-Lok Fung
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityKowloonHong Kong
  2. 2.School of Civil Engineering, University of BirminghamBirminghamUK
  3. 3.Department of Health Technology and InformaticsThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityKowloonHong Kong

Personalised recommendations