Materials and Structures

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 279–289 | Cite as

Evaluation of toughness of textile concrete

Original Article

Abstract

High Performance Fibre Reinforced Cementitious Composites (HPFRCC) are characterized by a stress–strain response in tension that exhibits strain-hardening behaviour accompanied by propagation of multiple cracks. This process is often referred to as pseudo-ductility due to multiple cracking with relatively large energy absorption capacity. The cracking characteristics are dependent on matrix strength, fibre/matrix bond, fibre volume fraction and the aspect ratio of the fibre used in the composite. The matrix cracking strength and interfacial bond vary with the degree of hydration of cement in the matrix, which is time and environment dependent. This study analyses the multiple cracking patterns formed in weathered Textile Concrete (TC) samples due to direct tensile testing, and links the cracking patterns to the tensile behaviour. The specimens used for the study were thin laminates which were produced by casting six layers of specially made polypropylene (PP) textile in fine-grained mortar. The samples were cured under controlled laboratory conditions for 28 days, and thereafter exposed to different weathering regimes for different periods. The weathered samples were tested in direct tension in a Universal Testing Machine (UTM) over a range of stresses. For all the samples tested, it was observed that the tensile behaviour was characterised by strain hardening and multiple cracking, which gave high tensile strains in excess of 20% at final failure. It was further found that the cracking patterns varied mainly with age, weathering history and stress levels. Other factors that contributed to the cracking characteristics were moisture state of the specimen and the fibre/matrix bonding strength. A strong bond and dense matrix resulted in wide crack spacings compared with samples with a weaker bond which developed closely spaced cracks. A general trend of increasing crack widths and crack spacings with ageing was observed which was accredited to increased hydration accompanied by an increase in fibre/matrix bond strength.

Keywords

Tensile behaviour Pseudo-ductility Multiple cracking Microcracking Cracking patterns 

References

  1. 1.
    Mechtcherine V, Jun P (2008) Behaviour of strain hardening cement-based composites in tension and compression. In: Gettu R (ed) Proceedings of the seventh RILEM international symposium on fibre reinforced concrete: design and applications (BEFIB 2008). RILEM Publications, Chennai, India, pp 471–481. ISBN 978-2-35158-064-6Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Naaman A (2008) Development and evolution of tensile strain hardening FRC composites. In: Gettu R (ed) Proceedings of the seventh RILEM international symposium on fibre reinforced concrete: design and applications (BEFIB 2008). RILEM Publications, Chennai, India, pp 1–28. ISBN 978-2-35158-064-6Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hannant D (1978) Fibre cements and fibre concretes. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cement Composites (HPFRCC 2) (1996) In: Naaman AE, Reinhardt HW (eds) Proceedings of the second international RILEM workshop-RILEM proceedings 31. Ej FN Spon. Chapman and Hall, Ann Arbor, p 506. ISBN O-4 19-2 1180-2Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mumenya S, Tait R, Alexander M (2003) Textile concrete, characterization of a new ductile material. In: Proceedings of second MRS conference. University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, pp 95–96Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hibbert A, Hannant D (1982) Toughness of cement composites containing polypropylene films compared with other fibre cements composites. Int J Sci Technol Reinf Mater Plast Cem Metals Ceram 13:393–399Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang S, Li V (2003) Tailoring of PVA fibre/matrix interface for engineered cementitious composites (ECC). In: Proceedings of fibre society conference: engineered with fibres. Loughborough, pp 91–92Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li V, Stang H (1997) Interface property characterization and strengthening mechanisms in fiber reinforced cement based composites. Adv Cem Mater 6:1–20Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li C, Mobasher B (1998) Finite element simulations of fiber pullout toughening in fiber reinforced cement based composites. Adv Cem Mater 7:123–132Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Naaman A, Reinhardt H (2004) High performance fiber reinforced cement composites HPFRCC-4: international workshop. Ann Arbor, Michigan. Cem Concr Compos 26:754–759Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tait R, Mumenya S, Alexander M, Hourahane D (2004) Textile composite concrete provides special architectural and permanent shuttering opportunities. In: Proceedings of conference on ‘developing concrete to serve practical needs’. Mindrand, South Africa, pp 281–288Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aveston J, Cooper G, Kelly A (1971) Single and multiple fracture. In: Proceedings, the properties of fibre composites. IPC Science and Technology Press, Surrey, pp 15–26Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kabele P (2003) Analytical model of multiple cracking in fibre reinforced cementitious composites under uni-axial tension. In: Proceedings of international conference on structural health monitoring and intelligent infrastucture, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kanda T, Lin Z, Li V (2000) Modeling of tensile stress–strain relation of pseudo strain hardening cementitious composites. ASCE J Mater Civil Eng 12(2):147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kabele P (2003) New developments in analytical modeling of mechanical behavior of ECC. J Adv Concr Technol 1(3):235–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hegger J, Sherif A, Brukermann O, Konrad M (2004) Textile reinforced concrete: investigations at different levels. In: Dubey A (ed) Proceedings, thin reinforced cement-based products and construction systems, SP-224. American Concrete Institute, pp 33–44Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bruckner A, Ortlepp R, Curbach M (2008) Anchoring of shear strengthening for T-beams made of textile reinforced concrete (TRC). Mater Struct J 41:407–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Banholzer B, Brockmann T, Brameshuber W (2006) Material and bonding characteristics for dimentioning and modelling of textile reinforced concrete (TRC) elements. Mater Struct J 39:749–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tait R, Guddye C (2002) Textile concrete-mechanical characterization of a unique fibre system for cement composites. In: Proceedings, concrete for 21st century conference. JohannesburgGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mumenya S, Tait R, Alexander M (2008) Effect of environmental exposure on the microstructure of textile concrete. In: Gettu (ed) Proceedings of the seventh RILEM international symposium on fibre reinforced concrete: design and applications (BEFIB 2008). RILEM Publications, Chennai, India, pp 293–302. ISBN 978-2-35158-064-6Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    ASTM C230 (1990) International standard on specification for flow table for use in tests of hydraulic cementGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Construction EngineeringUniversity of NairobiNairobiKenya
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations