Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical simulation of rebar/concrete interface debonding of FRP strengthened RC beams under fatigue load

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to simulate the rebar/concrete interface debonding of FRP strengthened RC beams under fatigue load and also, to ascertain the influence of design parameters such as the elastic modulus, thickness and length of the FRP plate on the debonding performance. In order to simplify the simulation, some basic equilibrium equations are formulated and then the stresses of the rebar and FRP plate are numerically solved, and stress intensity factor is avoided in the simulation by fundamentals of fracture mechanics because of its complexity around the crack tip of bi-material interface. With the combination of finite element method and difference approximation, authors program the degradation model of coefficient of friction, debond criterion, propagation law and loop of load process into a commercial finite element code to investigate the fatigue debonding. The relationships between the debond length as well as other fatigue parameters and number of cyclic load are obtained and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

Interfacial area per unit length

a :

Radius of rebar

b :

Width of concrete beam

b p :

Width of FRP plate

C c :

Volume fraction of concrete of ERR calculation zone

C s :

Volume fraction of rebar of ERR calculation zone

c :

Parameter of Paris law

d :

Concrete cover measured to center of rebar closest to tensile face of concrete

E :

Elastic modulus of ERR calculation zone when treated as an isotropic material

E c :

Tensile Young’s modulus of concrete

E p :

Young’s modulus of FRP plate

E s :

Young’s modulus of rebar

F :

External cyclic load

G :

Energy release rate

h :

Height of beam

\(\tilde{h}\) :

Height of ERR calculation zone

h d :

Step length in difference approximation

kd :

Distance from FRP plate end to the nearest support

L :

Length of beam

l :

Current debond length

l 0 :

Initial debond length

m :

Parameter of Paris law

N :

Fatigue cyclic number

\(\overline{N}\) :

Elapsed cycle when μ(0) attains the value (μ0 + μf)/2

N int :

Number of integration points

n :

Parameter describing the degradation velocity of coefficient of friction

q 0 :

Residual fiber compressive stress in the radial direction

r :

Distance between neutral axis of concrete and x axis

t :

Thickness of FRP plate

U :

Strain energy of ERR calculation zone

U e :

Strain energy of one element

vol i :

Volume of integration point i

ɛ0 :

Strain of compression concrete when the stress gets σ0

ɛc :

Strain of concrete

ɛcu :

Ultimate strain of compression concrete

ɛp :

Strain of FRP plate

ɛs :

Strain of rebar

el}:

Elastic strain vector

μ(N,z):

Coefficient of friction on the debonded interface

μ0 :

Original value of the coefficient of friction before reduction

μf :

Steady state or final value of the coefficient of friction where there is no further degradation on μ

σc :

Stress of concrete

σc0 :

Yield stress of compression concrete

σp :

Stress of FRP plate

σs :

Stress of rebar

{σ}T :

Elastic stress vector

τ:

Frictional stress

References

  1. Walls D, Zok F (1994) Interfacial fatigue in a fiber reinforced metal matrix composite. Acta Metall Mater 42:2675–2681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chan K (1993) Effects of interface degradation on fiber bridging of composite fatigue cracks. Acta Metall Mater 41:761–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gao YC, Zhou LM (1997) Analysis on interface damage of fiber reinforced composites under cyclic load. Theoret Appl Frac Mech 28:29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou LM, Kim JK, Mai YW (1993) Micromechanical characterization of fiber/matrix interfaces. Compos Sci Technol 48:227–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shi ZF, Zhou LM (2002) Interfacial damage in fiber-reinforced composites subjected to tension fatigue loading. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 25:445–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shi ZF, Zhang LN (2004) Simulation of interfacial fatigue of reinforced concrete under different loading cases. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 12:561–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shi ZF, Zhou LM (2000) Interfacial debonding of coated-fiber-reinforced composites under tension-tension cyclic loading. Acta Mech Sin 16:347–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shi ZF, Chen YH, Zhou LM (2005) Micromechanical damage modeling of fiber/matrix interface under cyclic loading. Compos Sci Technol 65:1203–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alavi-Fard M, Marzouk H (2002) Bond behavior of high strength concrete under reversed pull-out cyclic loading. Can J Civ Eng 29:191–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bresler B, Bertero V (1968) Behavior of reinforced concrete under repeated load. Am Soc Civil Eng 94:1576–1590

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ismail H, Jirsa J (1972) Bond determination in reinforced concrete subject to low cycle load. Am Concrete Inst 69:334–343

    Google Scholar 

  12. Triantafillou T, Deskovic N, Deuring M (1992) Strengthening of concrete structures with pre-stressed fibre reinforced plastic sheets. ACI Struct J 89(3):235–244

    Google Scholar 

  13. Varastehpour H, Hamelin P (1997) Strengthening of concrete beams using fiber reinforced plastics. Mater Struct 30:160–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schnerch D, Dawood M, Rizkalla S et al (2007) Proposed design guidelines for strengthening of steel bridges with FRP materials. Constr Build Mater 21:1001–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Carpinteri A, Lacidogna G, Paggi M (2007) Acoustic emission monitoring and numerical modeling of FRP delamination in RC beams with non-rectangular cross-section. Mater Struct 40:553–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lau KT, Dutta PK, Zhou LM, et al (2001) Mechanics of bonds in an FRP bonded concrete beam. Compos Part B–Eng 32:491–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Delale F, Erdogan F (1983) The crack problem for a nonhomogeneous plane. J Appl Mech 50:609–614

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Suresh S (1998) Fatigue of materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  19. Irwin G (1957) Analysis of stresses and strains near the end of a crack traversing a plate. J Appl Mech 24:361–364

    Google Scholar 

  20. Popovic S (1970) A review of stress-strain relationships for concrete. ACI Struct J 67:243–248

    Google Scholar 

  21. Park R, Paulay T (1975) Reinforced concrete structures. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jero P, Kerans R (1990) The contribution of interfacial roughness to sliding friction of ceramic fibers in a glass matrix. Scr Metall Mater 24:2315–2318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Marshall D, Shaw M, Morris W (1992) Measurement of interfacial debonding and sliding resistance in fiber reinforced intermetallics. Acta Metall Mater 40:443–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research project is funded by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 50378001) and the Teaching and Research Award Fund for Outstanding Young Teachers in Higher Education institutions of MOE, P.R. China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rong Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, R., Shi, Z. Numerical simulation of rebar/concrete interface debonding of FRP strengthened RC beams under fatigue load. Mater Struct 41, 1613–1621 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9352-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9352-3

Keywords

Navigation