Advertisement

Materials and Structures

, Volume 41, Issue 8, pp 1465–1472 | Cite as

Applicability of rheometers to characterizing earth mortar behavior. Part I: experimental device and validation

  • Givanildo Azeredo
  • Jean-Claude Morel
  • Claude-Henri Lamarque
Original Article

Abstract

The workability of earth mortars made with natural soils composed of clay and sand, also called soil mortars, such as sand–cement mortars, is in general studied using simple methods that are very useful in situ but are often incapable of describing the rheology in the fresh state. A more precise understanding of earth mortar behavior in the fresh state would enable more accurate prescription for building. The experimental devices used today, e.g., the slump test or flow table, indicate only one measurement which could possibly yield one rheological parameter, whereas at least two parameters are necessary to define the constitutive law of fresh sand–cement mortars in the case of a Bingham fluid behavior. A rheometer procedure is studied here in order to determine an earth mortar behavior law. Since this was the first time that this device was used with this material, we had to develop our experimental procedure using a rheometer, such as the blades required to shear the earth mortar and also the range of the applied rotation speed. The calibration of two blades is discussed and an interval of speed and time adequate for the test is given to define the earth mortar’s rheology.

Keywords

Earth mortar Adobe Rheology Workability Masonry Sustainable development 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the support of the CAPES, a Brazilian institute that financed the scholarship for a 4-year PhD student in France, along with the staff of the Civil Engineering Department and Geomaterials Laboratory of the ENTPE engineering school, who authorized and guided the progress of this research. The Universidade Federal da Paraíba and the Departamento de Engenharia Civil is warmly thanked for allowing the first author to carry out this work. Mrs. C. O’Brien is also warmly thanked for correcting the English of the paper and Mr P. Portail for the calibration of the blades.

References

  1. 1.
    Morel JC, Mesbah A, Oggero M, Walker P (2001) Building houses with local materials: means to drastically reduce the environmental impact of construction. Build Environ 10(36):1119–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morel JC, Pkla A, Walker P (2007) Compressive strength testing of compressed earth blocks. Construct Build Mater 21:303–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pkla A, Mesbah A, Rigassi V, Morel JC (2003) Comparaison de méthodes d’essais de mesures des caractéristiques mécaniques des mortiers de terre. Mater Struct 36(2):108–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Walker P, Stace T (1999) Bond characteristics of earth block. J Mater Civil Eng 30:249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Venkatarama Reddy BV, Gupta A (2005) Characteristics of cement-soil mortars. Mater Struct 38(6):638–650Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Walker P, Stace T (1997) Properties of some cement stabilised compressed earth blocks and mortars. Mater Struct 30(9):545–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bei GE (1996) Raw Earth—An ancient and modern building material. Master Thesis, Katholieke Universiteit LeuvenGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morel JC, Pkla A (2002) A model to measure compressive strength of compressed earth blocks with the ‘3 points bending test’. Construct Build Mater 16:303–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Flavigny E, Desrues J, Palayer B (1990) Note technique - Le sable d’Hostun RF. Revue Française Géotechniq 53:67–70Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Banfill PFG (1990) A coaxial cylinders viscometer for mortar: design and experimental validation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Rheology of Fresh Cement and Concrete, vol. 1, pp 217–226Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Banfill PFG (1995) Applications of Rheology in Mortar Production. Proceedings of the Fourth International Masonry Conference, vol. 1, pp 7–15Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bauer E, Souza JGG, Guimarães EA, Silva FGS (2007) Study of the laboratory Vane test on mortars. Build Environ 42(1):86–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ferraris CF (1999) Measurement of rheological properties of high-performance concrete: state of art report. Natl Inst Stand Technol, NISTIR 5869 104(5):461–478Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koehler EP, Fowler DW (2003) Summary of concrete workability test methods. Technical Report Documentation, International Center for Aggregates ResearchGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tattersall GH (1976) The Workability of concrete. Cement and Concrete Association, Slough, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tattersall GH (1991) Workability and quality control of concrete. Chapman and Hall, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Givanildo Azeredo
    • 1
  • Jean-Claude Morel
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Claude-Henri Lamarque
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Departamento de Engenharia Civil Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Cidade UniversitáriaCastelo BrancoBrazil
  2. 2.Université de LyonLyonFrance
  3. 3.Ecole Nationale des Travaux Publics de l’EtatVaulx-en-VelinFrance
  4. 4.Département Génie Civil et BâtimentCNRS, URA 1652Vaulx-en-VelinFrance

Personalised recommendations