Advertisement

Materials and Structures

, Volume 39, Issue 7, pp 695–706 | Cite as

Testing of anchorages in concrete under dynamic tensile loading

  • George Solomos
  • Mario Berra
Original Article

Abstract

The tensile dynamic behaviour of anchors in concrete has been experimentally investigated by employing Hopkinson bar techniques. Dynamic pull-out tests with two anchor size diameters have been performed, concrete cone breakout failure has been predominantly induced, and full force-displacement curves have been obtained.

The test results show that properly post-installed anchors can achieve the same load bearing capacity as the cast-in-place ones. It has also been verified that the three different types of anchors tested (with chemical adhesive, undercut, and headed studs) can develop comparable failure loads under similar embedment depths. Test results have demonstrated that force-displacement diagrams for dynamic loading tend in general to lie well above the corresponding static ones, i.e. additional ductility is available. Comparisons with predictions from design formulae have been conducted.

Keywords

Failure Load Embedment Depth Anchor Bolt Dynamic Increase Factor Anchor Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fuchs W, Eligehausen R, Breen JE (1995) Concrete Capacity Design (CCD) Approach for fastening to concrete. ACI Structural Journal, 92(S9).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    CEB (1991) Fastening to reinforced concrete and Masonry Structures: State-of-the-Art Report, Part 1, (Euro-International Concrete Committee).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reinhardt HW (1982) Concrete under impact loading: Tensile Strength and Bond. HERON 27(3).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rodriguez M, Zhang Y-G, Lotze D, Graves III HL, Klingner RE (1997) Dynamic behaviour of anchors in cracked and uncracked concrete: A progress report. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 168:23–34.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rodriguez M, Lotze D, Gross JH, Zhang Y-G, Klingner RE, Graves III HL (2001) Dynamic behavior of tensile anchors to concrete. ACI Structural Journal, 98(4):511–524.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim S-Y, Yu C-S, Yoon Y-S (2004) Sleeve-type expansion anchor behavior in cracked and uncracked concrete. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 228:273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ghobarah A, Aziz TS (2004) Seismic qualification of expansion anchors to Canadian nuclear standards. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 228:377–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shirvani M, Klingner RE, Graves III HL (2004) Breakout Capacity of Anchors in Concrete Part 1: Tension. ACI Structural Journal, 101(6):812–820.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ACI Committee 349 (2001) Code requirements for nuclear safety related concrete structures and commentary, (ACI 349–01, ACI 349R-01), Appendix B (2001, American Concrete Institute, (Farmington Hills, Mich) pp. 134.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ACI Committee 318 (2002) Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. (ACI 318–02, ACI 318R-02), Appendix D, (2002, American Concrete Institute, (Farmington Hills, Mich) pp. 443.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eligehausen R, Balogh T (1995) Behavior of fasteners loaded in tension in cracked reinforced concrete. ACI Structural Journal, 92(S35).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Solomos G, Berra M (2004) Testing of anchorages in concrete under dynamic loading. EC-JRC report, EUR 21094 EN.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Solomos G, Berra M (2005) Compressive behaviour of plain concrete at higher strain rates. Journal of the Mechanical Behaviour of Materials, 16(1–2):113–121.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lindholm US (1971) High strain rate tests, In techniques of metals research. Vol. V, Part l, R. F. Bunsmah editor (J. Wiley & Sons).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ACI Committee 349 (1997) Code requirements for nuclear safety related concrete structures and commentary. ACI349–97, ACI349R-97; Appendices B, C, (1997 April, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich.).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    ACI Committee 318 (1999) Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI318–99, ACI318R-99, (1999 March, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich.).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bischoff PH, Perry SH (1991) Compressive behavior of concrete at high strain rates. Materials and Structures, 24:425–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhao H, Gary G (1996) On the use of SHPB techniques to determine the dynamic behavior of materials in the range of small strains. Int J Solids Structures, 33(23):3363–3375.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Banthia N, Mindess S, Bentur A, Pigeon M (1989) Impact testing of concrete using a drop weight impact machine. Experimental Mechanics, 29(1):63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    CEN October (2001) Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures – Part 1: General rules and rules for buildings. prEN1992–1.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rossi P, Toutlemonde F (1996) Effect of Loading Rate on the Tensile Behavior of Concrete: Description of the Physical Mechanisms. Materials and Structures, 29:116–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cadoni E, Albertini C, Labibes K, Solomos G (2001) Behavior of plain concrete subjected to tensile loading at high strain rate. In ‘Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures,’ Proceedings FRAMCOS-4 (Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan, France).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Solomos
    • 1
  • Mario Berra
    • 2
  1. 1.European CommissionJoint Research CentreIspraItaly
  2. 2.CESIMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations