Advertisement

Materials and Structures

, 52:98 | Cite as

Performance of bio-oil modified paving asphalt: chemical and rheological characterization

  • Chao Wang
  • Tingting Xie
  • Wei CaoEmail author
Original Article
  • 75 Downloads

Abstract

Asphalt binders modified with bio-oils derived from various biomasses have been developed for addressing pavement sustainability and environmental concerns. This study evaluated the bio-binders modified with bio-oils derived from waste cooking oil, and was aimed for the chemical and rheological characterization under different oxidative aging conditions and the aging susceptibility of the bio-binders. The chemical analysis was based on saturates, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes (SARA) fractionation, gel permeation chromatography (GPC), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The rheological characterization consisted of multiple stress creep recovery, linear amplitude sweep, and elastic recovery tests. The results indicated that aging caused shift from the light components to the asphaltenes or heavy molecules. The bio-oil modification balanced the effect of aging by producing relatively well-dispersed asphalt systems in comparison to the petroleum control. According to the SARA and GPC analyses, the petroleum asphalt was less susceptible to aging. The TGA results suggested that once aged the bio-binders were less stable under high temperatures presumably due to thermal degradation of the bio-oil molecules. The addition of bio-oil lowered the rutting resistance and marginally reduced the elastic recovery potential; according to the corresponding evaluation parameters, the aging resistance of the bio-binders was similar or slightly lower as compared to the control. The bio-oil modification improved the fatigue cracking performance and also reduced the aging susceptibility within the context of fatigue resistance. The correlation between the chemical and rheological properties of the bio-binders were in line with the implications based on the colloidal model for petroleum asphalts.

Keywords

Bio-oil Fatigue cracking Rutting resistance Durability Aging susceptibility 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the sponsorship from Beijing Municipal Education Commission (KM201810005020), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (8174059), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (51608018).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Transportation Research Board (2012) Alternative binders for sustainable asphalt pavements. Transportation Research Circular E-C165, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xiu S, Shahbazi A (2012) Bio-oil production and upgrading research: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:4406–4414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fini EH, Høgsaa B, Christiansen JC, Sanporean CG, Jensen EA, Mousavi M, Pahlavan F (2017) Multiscale investigation of a bioresidue as a novel intercalant for sodium montmorillonite. J Phys Chem C 121:1794–1802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Han Z, Sha A, Tong Z, Liu Z, Gao J, Zou X (2017) Study on the optimum rice husk ash content added in asphalt binder and its modification with bio-oil. Constr Build Mater 147:776–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen M, Leng B, Wu S, Sang Y (2014) Physical, chemical and rheological properties of waste edible vegetable oil rejuvenated asphalt binders. Constr Build Mater 66:286–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sun Z, Yi J, Huang Y, Feng D, Guo C (2016) Properties of asphalt binder modified by bio-oil derived from waste cooking oil. Constr Build Mater 102:496–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gong M, Zhu H, Pauli T, Yang J, Wei J, Yao Z (2017) Evaluation of bio-binder modified asphalt’s adhesion behavior using sessile drop device and atomic force microscopy. Constr Build Mater 145:42–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sun D, Sun G, Du Y, Zhu X, Lu T, Pang Q, Shi S, Dai Z (2017) Evaluation of optimized bio-asphalt containing high content waste cooking oil residues. Fuel 202:529–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sun D, Lu T, Xiao F, Zhu X, Sun G (2017) Formulation and aging resistance of modified bio-asphalt containing high percentage of waste cooking oil residues. J Clean Prod 161:1203–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang C, Xue L, Xie W, You Z, Yang X (2018) Laboratory investigation on chemical and rheological properties of bio-asphalt binders incorporating waste cooking oil. Constr Build Mater 167:348–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hilten RN, Das KC (2010) Comparison of three accelerated aging procedures to assess bio-oil stability. Fuel 89(10):2741–2749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Onochie A, Fini E, Yang X, Mills-Beale J, You Z (2013) Rheological characterization of nano-particle based bio-modified binder. Paper no. 13-4895, TRB 92nd annual meeting compendium of papersGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang X, You Z, Mills-Beale J (2015) Asphalt binders blended with a high percentage of biobinders: aging mechanism using FTIR and rheology. J Mater Civ Eng 27(4):04014157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fini EH, Oldham D, Buabeng FS, Nezhad SH (2015) Investigating the aging susceptibility of bio-modified asphalts. Airfield Highw Pavements 2015:62–73Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    AASHTO (2013) Standard method of test for effect of heat and air on a moving film of asphalt binder (rolling thin-film oven test). AASHTO T240, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    AASHTO (2012) Standard practice for accelerated aging of asphalt binder using a pressurized aging vessel (PAV). AASHTO R28, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mangiafico S, Di Benedetto H, Sauzéat C, Olard F, Pouget S, Planque L (2016) Effect of colloidal structure of bituminous binder blends on linear viscoelastic behaviour of mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavement. Mater Des 111:126–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weigel S, Stephan D (2017) Modelling of rheological and ageing properties of bitumen based on its chemical structure. Mater Struct 50(1):83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    ASTM (2009) Standard test method for separation of asphalt into four fractions. ASTM D4124, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jennings PW, Pribanic JAS, Dawson KR, Bricca CE (1981) Use of HPLC and NMR spectroscopy to characterize asphaltic materials. Am Chem Soc Div Pet Chem 26(4):915–922Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Churchill EV, Amirkhanian SN, Burati JL Jr (1995) HP-GPC characterization of asphalt aging and selected properties. J Mater Civ Eng 7(1):41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhao S, Huang B, Shu X, Woods ME (2016) Quantitative evaluation of blending and diffusion in high RAP and RAS mixtures. Mater Des 89:1161–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hao G, Huang W, Yuan J, Tang N, Xiao F (2017) Effect of aging on chemical and rheological properties of SBS modified asphalt with different compositions. Constr Build Mater 156:902–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Polacco G, Filippi S, Paci M, Giuliani F, Merusi F (2012) Structural and rheological characterization of wax modified bitumens. Fuel 95:407–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Norambuena-Contreras J, García A (2016) Self-healing of asphalt mixture by microwave and induction heating. Mater Des 106:404–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    AASHTO (2014) Standard method of test for multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR). AASHTO T350, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    D’Angelo JA, Kluttz R, Dongre RN, Stephens K, Zanzotto L (2007) Revision of the Superpave high temperature binder specification: the multiple stress creep recovery test. J Assoc Asph Paving Technol 76:123–162Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    D’Angelo JA (2009) The relationship of the MSCR test to rutting. Road Mater Pavement Des 10(s1):61–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang J, Walubita LF, Faruk ANM, Karki P, Simate GS (2015) Use of the MSCR test to characterize the asphalt binder properties relative to HMA rutting performance—a laboratory study. Constr Build Mater 94:218–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang C, Castorena C, Zhang J, Kim YR (2015) Unified failure criterion for asphalt binder under cyclic fatigue loading. Road Mater Pavement Des 16(s2):125–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cao W, Wang C (2018) A new comprehensive analysis framework for fatigue characterization of asphalt binder using the linear amplitude sweep test. Constr Build Mater 171:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cao W, Wang C (2019) Fatigue performance characterization and prediction of asphalt binders using the linear amplitude sweep based viscoelastic continuum damage approach. Int J Fatigue 119:112–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Clopotel CS, Bahia HU (2012) Importance of elastic recovery in the DSR for binders and mastics. Eng J 16(4):99–106.  https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2012.16.4.99 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang C, Zhao L, Cao W, Cao D, Tian B (2017) Development of paving performance index system for selection of modified asphalt binder. Constr Build Mater 153:695–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang J, Faruk ANM, Karki P, Holleran I, Hu X, Walubita LF (2016) Relating asphalt binder elastic recovery properties to HMA cracking and fracture properties. Constr Build Mater 121:236–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    AASHTO (2016) Standard method of test for measuring asphalt binder yield energy and elastic recovery using the dynamic shear rheometer. AASHTO TP123, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Daly WH (2017) Relationship between chemical makeup of binders and engineering performance: a synthesis of highway practice. NCHRP Synthesis 511, Transportation Research Board, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dunn K, Chilingarian GV, Lian H, Wang YY, Yen TF (2000) Analysis of asphalt and its components by thin-layer chromatography. Dev Pet Sci 40(B):305–317Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Loeber L, Muller G, Morel J, Sutton O (1998) Bitumen in colloidal science: a chemical, structural and rheological approach. Fuel 77(13):1443–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yu H, Leng Z, Gao Z (2016) Thermal analysis on the component interaction of asphalt binders modified with crumb rubber and warm mix additives. Constr Build Mater 125:168–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Traxler RN (1961) Asphalt: its composition, properties and uses. Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cross MM (1969) Polymer rheology: influence of molecular weight and polydispersity. J Appl Polym Sci 13:765–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Road and Railway EngineeringBeijing University of TechnologyBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations