Advertisement

Materials and Structures

, 51:173 | Cite as

Recommendation of RILEM TC 237-SIB on affinity between aggregates and bituminous binders

  • Laurent Porot
  • Hilde Soenen
  • Alex Apeagyei
  • James Grenfell
  • Stefan Vansteenkiste
  • Emmanuel Chailleux
RILEM Technical Committee
  • 110 Downloads

Abstract

These recommendations are based on the results of a round robin test organised by the RILEM technical committee TC 237-SIB “Testing and characterization of sustainable innovative bituminous materials and systems”. The Task Group 1 (TG1) focused on binder testing. The aim of the TG1 was to further understand the fundamental mechanism of water interaction in asphalt mixture, and to review the various test methods available to evaluate the affinity of bituminous binders to aggregate surfaces. A total of 13 laboratories participated, running different test methods. Three bituminous binders and four aggregate types were selected for testing. These recommendations focus on the main aspects related to testing procedure, measurement and presentation of results. While some qualitative trends are observed, there is still a wide scattering in results both within the same test method and between test methods. This is not only related to a visual interpretation of the degree of bitumen coverage, but also theoretical and numerical analyses of test results. The overall recommendation is to consider the results within qualitative classes.

Keywords

Bituminous binder Aggregate affinity Round robin test Water sensitivity Durability Surface energy Adhesion Rolling bottle test Boiling water test Bitumen bond test 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank Jeroen Besamusca, Vincent Gaudefroy, Preeda Chaturabing, Crsitina Tozzo, Ignacio Artamendi, Darius Sybilski, Francisco Barcelo Martinez, Said Safwat, Manfred Partl, Francesco Canestrari, Elisabeth Hauser, and Michael Wistuba for their valuable contribution.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Rieder W, Weber H (1933) Adhesion of bituminous binders to stone. Asph.u. Teer, pp 37–41Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mathews DH, Colwill DM, Yuce R (1964) Adhesion tests for bituminous materials. Middlesex, Road Research Laboratory. Note LN698Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    NCAT (1988) Stripping in HMA mixtures: state-of-the-art and critical review of test methods. NCAT Report No 88-02Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    BitVal (2006) Analysis of available data for validation of bitumen tests. Report on phase 1 of the BitVal ProjectGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Porot L, Soenen H, Besamusca J, Apeagyei A, Grenfell J, Sylbilski D (2015) Bitumen/aggregate affinity—rilem round robin test on rolling bottle test. In: RILEM SIB symposium, Ancona, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vansteenkiste S, Grenfell J, Porot L, Apeagyei A, Soenen H, Chailleux E (2017) Bitumen aggregate affinity: a comparison between rolling bottle and boiling water test. In: 7th EATA symposium, Dubendorf, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Partl M, Porot L, Di Benedetto H, Canestrari F, Marsac P, Tebaldi G (2018) Testing and characterization of sustainable innovative bituminous materials and systems-state-of-the-art report of the RILEM 237-SIB. In: RILEM (ed), vol 24. Spinger, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    EN, “CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation), EN 12697-11-bituminous mixtures-test methods for hot mix asphalt—part 11: determination of the affinity between aggregate and bitumen,” EN 12697-11Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    NF, “XP T 066-043-Essai d’adhésivité passive des liants anhydres en présence d’eau,” Norme FrancaiseGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    AASHTO (2011) AASHTO TP 91-Method of test for determining asphalt binder bond strength by means of the asphalt bond strengthGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kraton ChemicalAlmereThe Netherlands
  2. 2.NynasMachelenBelgium
  3. 3.University of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  4. 4.Belgium Road Research CenterBrusselsBelgium
  5. 5.LUNAM Université, IFSTTARBouguenaisFrance

Personalised recommendations