Numerical simulations of crack path control using soundless chemical demolition agents and estimation of required pressure for plain concrete demolition
- 149 Downloads
In demolition process of large concrete structures, the non-explosive methods can be advantageous in reducing noise, vibration, and dust emission compared to the conventional explosive methods. One of the representative non-explosive methods is the injection of soundless chemical demolition agents (SCDAs) into the holes drilled in concrete structures and further expansion of the SCDAs. In the current paper, a computational framework was established and applied to simulate crack initiation and propagation caused by slow expansion of the SCDAs in plain concrete structures from a theoretical perspective. Using the concrete damaged plasticity model for semi-infinite structures, we first determined a proper domain size for the demolition simulation and then investigated a cost-effective spacing of the SCDA holes arranged horizontally or vertically. The interaction between the SCDAs was examined in terms of the minimum expansion pressure required to form cracks connecting the SCDAs. Furthermore, we found an equation for the minimum expansion pressure required to control a U-shaped crack path as a function of SCDA spacing and concrete compressive strength.
KeywordsSoundless chemical demolition agent (SCDA) Non-explosive demolition method Concrete demolition Concrete damaged plasticity
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2017R1D1A1A09000716).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- 3.Huynh M-P, Laefer DF (2009) Expansive cements and soundless chemical demolition agents: State-of-technology review. In: Proceedings of the 11th conference on science and technology, Ho Chi Minh City, VietnamGoogle Scholar
- 4.Natanzi AS, Laefer DF (2014) Using chemicals as demolition agents near historic structures. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on structural analysis of historical constructions, Mexico City, MexicoGoogle Scholar
- 6.Harada T, Soeda K, Idemitsu T, Watanabe A (1994) Characteristics of expansive pressure of an expansive demolition agent and the development of new pressure transducers. Concr Libr Int 24:95–109Google Scholar
- 9.Swanson DE, Labuz JF (1999) Behavior of a calcium oxide-based expansive cement. Concr Sci Eng 1(3):166–172Google Scholar
- 10.Goto K, Kojima K, Watabe K (1988) The mechanism of expansive pressure and blow-out of static demolition agent. In: Proceedings of the second international RILEM symposium on demolition and reuse of concrete and masonry, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
- 13.Natanzi AS, Laefer DF, Mullane S (2016) Chemical demolition of unit masonry: A preparatory study. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on structural analysis of historical constructions, Leuven, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
- 14.Arshadnejad S, Goshtasbi K (2011) Analysis of the radial and tangential stress distribution between two neighbouring circular holes under internal pressure by numerical modelling. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 111(5):301–308Google Scholar
- 16.Arshadnejad S, Niu J (2014) Birth of the first crack and its growth under incremental static loading between two holes in brittle rocks. J Earth Eng 1(1):1–15Google Scholar
- 22.Cook RD, Malkus DS, Plesha ME, Witt RJ (2001) Concepts and applications of finite element analysis, 4th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 23.Dassault Systèmes (2014) Abaqus 6.14 documentationGoogle Scholar
- 31.International Federation for Structural Concrete (FIB) (2013) The fib model code for concrete structures 2010. Ernst & Sohn, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 32.Archer Company USA, Inc. (2018) http://www.dexpan.com/dexpan-non-explosive-controlled-demolition-agent-silent-cracking-breaking.aspx. Accessed 15 Nov 2018