Advertisement

Materials and Structures

, 51:158 | Cite as

Secondary bioreceptivity of granite: effect of salt weathering on subaerial biofilm growth

  • Daniel Vázquez-Nion
  • Federica Troiano
  • Patricia Sanmartín
  • Chiara Valagussa
  • Francesca Cappitelli
  • Beatriz Prieto
Original Article
  • 92 Downloads

Abstract

Salt crystallisation is a very common and powerful weathering agent that can modify the petrophysical properties of building stone such as granite. In addition, the weathering can affect the susceptibility of the stone to biological colonisation. The aims of the present study were to examine the properties of a granite weathered by sodium chloride crystallisation and to evaluate the effects of the weathering on the secondary bioreceptivity of the stone to subaerial phototrophic biofilms. For this purpose, granite samples were subjected to a laboratory-based accelerated salt weathering test, and changes in weight, open porosity, bulk density, capillary water content, abrasion pH and surface roughness of the samples were determined. Samples of both weathered and non-weathered granite were then inoculated with a multi-species phototrophic culture derived from a natural subaerial biofilm and incubated under standardised laboratory conditions for 3 months. The weight loss produced by the weathering process was consistent with significant changes in abrasion pH and surface roughness. The bioreceptivity of the stone was also altered. According to the bioreceptivity index, the granite under study was characterised by ‘mild primary bioreceptivity’, but ‘high secondary bioreceptivity’ after the salt weathering process. Study of the secondary bioreceptivity of stone materials can provide very useful information about response to weathering effects, and the findings can be used to improve the selection of materials for building purposes.

Keywords

Cultural heritage Phototrophic biofilm Sodium chloride Stone 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was partly financed through the Project CGL2016-79778-R (AEI/FEDER, UE). D. Vázquez-Nion was financially supported by postdoctoral Contract ED481B/2017/016 (Xunta de Galicia). P. Sanmartín was financially supported by postdoctoral Contract POS-B/2016/030 (Xunta de Galicia).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Guillitte O (1995) Bioreceptivity: a new concept for building ecology studies. Sci Total Environ 167:215–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miller AZ, Sanmartin P, Pereira-Pardo L, Dionisio A, Saiz-Jimenez C, Macedo MF, Prieto B (2012) Bioreceptivity of building stones: A review. Sci Total Environ 426:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shirakawa MA, Beech IB, Tapper R, Cincotto MA, Gambale W (2003) The development of a method to evaluate bioreceptivity of indoor mortar plastering to fungal growth. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 51:83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prieto B, Silva B (2005) Estimation of the potential bioreceptivity of granitic rocks from their intrinsic properties. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 56:206–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Escadeillas G, Bertron A, Blanc G, Dubosc A (2007) Accelerated testing of biological stain growth on external concrete walls. Part 1: development of the growth tests. Mater Struct 40:1061–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Escadeillas G, Bertron A, Ringot E, Blanc G, Dubosc A (2009) Accelerated testing of biological stain growth on external concrete walls. Part 2: quantification of growths. Mater Struct 42:937–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miller AZ, Dionisio A, Laiz L, Macedo MF, Saiz-Jimenez C (2009) The influence of inherent properties of building limestones on their bioreceptivity to phototrophic microorganisms. Ann Microbiol 59:705–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miller AZ, Leal N, Laiz L, Rogerio-Candelera MA, Silva RJC, Dionisio A, Macedo MF, Saiz-Jimenez C (2010) Primary bioreceptivity of limestones used in Southern Europe monuments. In: Smith BJ, Gomez-Heras M, Viles HA, Cassar J (eds) Limestone in the built environment: present day challenges for the preservation of the past. Geological Society Special Publications, London, pp 79–92Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tran TH, Govin A, Guyonnet R, Grosseau P, Lors C, Garcia-Diaz E, Damidot D, Devès O, Ruot B (2012) Influence of the intrinsic characteristics of mortars on biofouling by Klebsormidium flaccidum. Int Biodeter Biodegr 70:31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tran TH, Govin A, Guyonnet R, Grosseau P, Lors C, Damidot D, Devès O, Ruot B (2014) Influence of the intrinsic characteristics of mortars on their biofouling by pigmented organisms: comparison between laboratory and field-scale experiments. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 86:334–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D’Orazio M, Cursio G, Graziani L, Aquilanti L, Osimani A, Clementi F, Yéprémian C, Lariccia V, Amoroso S (2014) Effects of water absorption and surface roughness on the bioreceptivity of ETICS compared to clay bricks. Build Environ 77:20–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vázquez-Nion D, Silva B, Prieto B (2018) Influence of the properties of granitic rocks on their bioreceptivity to subaerial phototrophic biofilms. Sci Total Environ 610–611:44–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Urzì C, De Leo F (2007) Evaluation of the efficiency of water-repellent and biocide compounds against microbial colonization of mortars. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 60:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cappitelli F, Nosanchuk JD, Casadevall A, Toniolo L, Brusetti L, Florio S, Principi P, Borin S, Sorlini C (2007) Synthetic consolidants attacked by melanin-producing fungi: case study of the biodeterioration of Milan (Italy) cathedral marble treated with acrylics. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:271–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nascimbene J, Salvadori O (2008) Lichen recolonization on restored calcareous statues of three Venetian villas. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 62:313–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nascimbene J, Salvadori O, Nimis PL (2009) Monitoring lichen recolonization on a restored calcareous statue. Sci Total Environ 407:2420–2426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Prieto B, Sanmartín P, Silva C, Vázquez-Nion D, Silva B (2014) Deleterious effect plastic-based biocides on back-ventilated granite facades. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 86:19–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sasso S, Miller AZ, Rogerio-Candelera MA, Cubero B, Coutinho ML, Scrano L, Bufo SA (2016) Potential of natural biocides for biocontrolling phototrophic colonization on limestone. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 107:102–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goffredo GB, Accoroni S, Totti C, Romagnoli T, Valentini L, Munafò P (2017) Titanium dioxide based nanotreatments to inhibit microalgal fouling on building stone surfaces. Build Environ 112:209–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saiz-Jimenez C, Ariño X, Ortega-Calvo JJ (1995) Mechanisms of stone deterioration by photosynthesis-based epilithic biofilms. In: De Cleene M (ed) Teractive physical weathering and bioreceptivity study on building stones, monitored by Computerized X-Ray Tomography (CT) as a potential non-destructive research tool. Protection and conservation of the European Cultural Heritage. Science Information Office, Ghent, pp 25–62Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Silva B, Prieto B, Rivas T, Sanchez-Biezma MJ, Paz G, Carballal R (1997) Rapid biological colonization of a granitic building by lichens. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 40:263–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Papida S, Murphy W, May E (2000) Enhancement of physical weathering of building stones by microbial populations. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 46:305–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dubosc A, Escadeillas G, Blanc PJ (2001) Characterization of biological stains on external concrete walls and influence of concrete as underlying material. Cem Concr Res 31:1613–1617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cámara B, De los Ríos A, García del Cura MA, Galván V, Ascaso C (2008) Dolostone bioreceptivity to fungal colonization. Mater Constr 58:113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cámara B, De los Ríos A, Urizal M, Álvarez de Buergo M, Varas MJ, Fort R, Ascaso C (2011) Characterizing the microbial colonization of a Dolostone Quarry: implications for stone biodeterioration and response to biocide treatments. Microb Ecol 62:299–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    De los Ríos A, Cámara B, García del Cura MA, Rico VJ, Galván V, Ascaso C (2009) Deteriorating effects of lichen and microbial colonization of carbonate building rocks in the Romanesque churches of Segovia (Spain). Sci Total Environ 407:1123–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Marques J, Vázquez-Nion D, Paz-Bermúdez G, Prieto B (2015) The susceptibility of weathered versus unweathered schist to biological colonization in the Côa Valley Archaeological Park (north-east Portugal). Environ Microbiol 17:1805–1816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gulotta D, Villa F, Cappitelli F, Toniolo L (2018) Biofilm colonization of metamorphic lithotypes of a renaissance cathedral exposed to urban atmosphere. Sci Total Environ 639:1480–1490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cutler NA, Viles HA, Ahmad S, McCabe S, Smith BJ (2013) Algal ‘greening’ and the conservation of stone heritage structures. Sci Total Environ 442:152–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pinna D (2017) Coping with biological growth on stone heritage objects: methods, products, applications, and perspectives. Apple Academic Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rivas T, Prieto B, Silva B, Birginie JM (2003) Weathering of granitic rocks by chlorides: effect of the nature of the solution on weathering morphology. Earth Surf Process Landf 28:425–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Begonha A (2009) Mineralogical study of the deterioration of granite stones of two Portuguese churches and characterization of the salt solutions in the porous network by the presence of diatoms. Mater Charact 60:621–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    López-Arce P, Varas-Muriel MJ, Fernández-Revuelta B, Álvarez de Buergo M, Fort R, Pérez-Soba C (2010) Artificial weathering of Spanish granites subjected to salt crystallization tests: surface roughness quantification. CATENA 83:170–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vázquez P, Luque A, Alonso FJ, Grossi CM (2013) Surface changes on crystalline stones due to salt crystallisation. Environ Earth Sci 69:1237–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pozo-Antonio JS, Pereira MFC, Rocha CSA, Puente I, Figueiredo C (2016) Comparative study of deterioration forms on nearby granitic bridges from an urban setting in the NW Iberian Peninsula. Geomorphology 274:11–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Benavente D, García del Cura MA, Bernabéu A, Ordóñez S (2001) Quantification of salt weathering in porous stones using an experimental continuous partial immersion method. Eng Geol 59:313–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    EN (1999) 12370:1999. Natural stone test methods: determination of real density and apparent density, and of total and open porosity. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Grant WH (1969) Abrasion pH, an index of chemical weathering. Clay Clay Miner 17:151–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    EN (1999) 1936:1999 Natural stone test methods: determination of real density and apparent density, and of total and open porosity. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    EN (1999) 1925:1999. Natural stone test methods: determination of water absorption coefficient by capillarity. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Vázquez-Nion D, Rodríguez-Castro J, López-Rodríguez MC, Fernández-Silva I, Prieto B (2016) Subaerial biofilms on granitic historic buildings: microbial diversity and development of phototrophic multi-species cultures. Biofouling 32:657–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vázquez-Nion D, Silva B, Troiano F, Prieto B (2017) Laboratory grown subaerial biofilms on granite: application to the study of bioreceptivity. Biofouling 33:24–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schreiber U, Gademann R, Bird P, Ralph PJ, Larkum AWD, Kuhl M (2002) Apparent light requirement for activation of photosynthesis upon rehydration of desiccated beachrock microbial mats. J Phycol 38:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Prieto B, Sanmartín P, Silva B, Martínez-Verdú F (2010) Measuring the color of granite rocks: a proposed procedure. Color Res Appl 35:368–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    CIE (1986) Colorimetry: CIE publication 15-2. Central Bureau of the Commission Internationale l’Eclairage, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vázquez-Nion D, Silva B, Prieto B (2018) Bioreceptivity index for granitic rocks used as construction material. Sci Total Environ 633:112–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Scardino AJ, Guenther J, De Nys R (2008) Attachment point theory revisited: the fouling response to a microtextured matrix. Biofouling 24:45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Cardell C, Delalieux F, Roumpopoulos K, Moropoulou A, Auger F, Van Grieken R (2003) Salt-induced decay in calcareous stone monuments and buildings in a marine environment in SW France. Constr Build Mater 17:165–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mottershead D, Gorbushina A, Lucas G, Wright J (2003) The influence of marine salts, aspect and microbes in the weathering of sandstone in two historic structures. Build Environ 38:1193–1204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Silva B, Rivas T, Garcia-Rodeja E, Prieto B (2007) Distribution of ions of marine origin in Galicia (NW Spain) as a function of distance from the sea. Atmos Environ 41:4396–4407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Morillas H, Maguregui M, Gómez-Laserna O, Trebolazabala J, Madariaga JM (2012) Characterisation and diagnosis of the conservation state of cementitious materials exposed to the open air in XIX century lighthouses located on the coast of the Basque Country: ‘the case of Igueldo lighthouse, San Sebastian, North of Spain’. J Raman Spectrosc 43:1630–1636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Rivas T, Prieto B, Silva B (1997) The effect of crystallisation of Na2SO4 and NaCl on the weathering of various granites. In: Moropoulou A (ed) Proceedings 4th international symposium on the conservation of monuments in the Mediterranean Basin. Technical Chamber of Greece, Athens, pp 271–281Google Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Edafoloxía e Química Agrícola, Facultade de FarmaciaUniversidade de Santiago de CompostelaSantiago de CompostelaSpain
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Scienze per gli Alimenti, la Nutrizione e l’Ambiente (DeFENS)Università degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations