Advertisement

Materials and Structures

, 51:157 | Cite as

Impact of fibre orientation on tensile, bending and shear behaviors of a steel fibre reinforced concrete

  • Julien Doyon-Barbant
  • Jean-Philippe Charron
Original Article
  • 155 Downloads

Abstract

Fibre orientation and density are known to have a significant influence on steel fibre reinforced concretes (SFRC) mechanical properties. In practice, parameters such as fresh state properties, restriction to concrete flowability and placing methods are likely to induce different fibre orientations in characterisation specimens and structural components. This difference in fibre orientation can impact the mechanical behavior of the structural component and therefore provide an unsafe design if not considered. This project consisted to produce a large SFRC slab, extract specimens with different fibre orientations, and submit specimens to tensile, bending and shear tests to evaluate the impact of fibre orientation and density on mechanical and post-peak strengths. Test results have shown that tensile and bending behaviors are mainly influenced by the fibre orientation, while the shear behavior is mainly impacted by fibre density. Test results were processed to allow comparison between tensile and bending tests. Linear correlations between tensile residual stresses and fibre orientation where found, linear or power type correlations according to bending residual stresses, as well as linear correlations between shear stresses and fibre density.

Keywords

Fibre reinforced concrete Fibre orientation Fibre density Tensile Bending Shear Correlations 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Holcim, Bekaert and Euclid for their material donations.

Funding

This project was financially supported by an industrial research project funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Grant No CRD 419432-11), City of Montreal, Jacques Cartier and Champlain Bridges Inc., Béton Brunet and Euclid.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The authors declare that the research work complies with ethical standards of the journal.

References

  1. 1.
    fib International Federation for Structural Concrete (2013) fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010. Wiley Editor, 434 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    ACI Committee 544 (2002) Design considerations for steel fiber reinforced concrete. American Concrete Institute, vol ACI 544.1R-96. ACI Farmington HillsGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lameiras R, Barros JA, Azenha M (2015) Influence of casting condition on the anisotropy of the fracture properties of steel fibre reinforced self-compacting concrete (SFRSCC). Cem Concr Compos 59:60–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dupont D, Vandewalle L (2005) Distribution of steel fibres in rectangular sections. Cem Concr Compos 27(3):391–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Parmentier B, Vandewalle L, Rickstal F (2008) Evaluation of the scatter of the postpeak behaviour of fibre reinforced concrete in bending: A step towards reliability. In: Proceedings of the 7th RILEM international symposium on fibre reinforced concrete: design and applications-BEFIB. pp 133–143Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Banthia N, Majdzadeh F, Wu J, Bindiganavile V (2014) Fiber synergy in hybrid fiber reinforced concrete (HyFRC) in flexure and direct shear. Cem Concr Compos 48:91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Delsol S (2012) Evaluation of fiber orientation to predict the mechanical behavior of fiber reinforced concrete under tensile and bending loads. M. Sc. thesis, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal, Canada, (in French) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blanco A, Pujadas P, de la Fuente A, Cavalaro S, Aguado A (2015) Assessment of the fibre orientation factor in SFRC slabs. Compos Part B Eng 68:343–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferrara L, Caverzan A, Muhaxheri M, Di Prisco M (2012) Identification of tensile behaviour of SFR-SCC: direct vs. indirect tests. In: Fibre reinforced concrete: challenges and opportunities, proceedings BEFIB 2012, 8th international RILEM symposium. RILEM Publications SARL, p 12Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ferrara L, Ozyurt N, Di Prisco M (2011) High mechanical performance of fibre reinforced cementitious composites: the role of “casting-flow induced” fibre orientation. Mater Struct 44(1):109–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kang ST, Lee BY, Kim J-K, Kim YY (2011) The effect of fibre distribution characteristics on the flexural strength of steel fibre-reinforced ultra high strength concrete. Constr Build Mater 25(5):2450–2457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kang ST, Kim J-K (2012) Investigation on the flexural behavior of UHPCC considering the effect of fiber orientation distribution. Constr Build Mater 28(1):57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Şanal İ, Zihnioğlu NÖ (2013) To what extent does the fiber orientation affect mechanical performance? Constr Build Mater 44:671–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abrishambaf A, Barros JA, Cunha VM (2013) Relation between fibre distribution and post-cracking behaviour in steel fibre reinforced self-compacting concrete panels. Cem Concr Res 51:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zerbino R, Tobes J, Bossio M, Giaccio G (2012) On the orientation of fibres in structural members fabricated with self compacting fibre reinforced concrete. Cem Concr Compos 34(2):191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boulekbache B, Hamrat M, Chemrouk M, Amziane S (2012) Influence of yield stress and compressive strength on direct shear behaviour of steel fibre-reinforced concrete. Constr Build Mater 27(1):6–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Doyon-Barbant J (2018) Impact of fiber orientation on the mechanical behavior of steel fiber reinforced concrete under tensile, bending and shear loads. M. Sc. thesis, Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal, Montreal, Canada, (in French) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hollmann C, Wille K Influence of fiber orientation on the properties of strain hardening ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) under direct tensile loading. In: 5th International conference on structural engineering, mechanics and computation, SEMC 2013, September 2, 2013–September 4, 2013, Cape Town, South africa, 2013, pp 1721–1726Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mirsayah AA, Banthia N (2002) Shear strength of steel fiber-reinforced concrete. ACI Mater J 99:(5)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Delsol S, Charron J-P (2013) Numerical modeling of UHPFRC mechanical behavior based on fibre orientation. In: Internationale conference UHPFRC 2013, Aix-en-Provence, FranceGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Plagué T, Desmettre C, Charron J-P (2017) Influence of fiber type and fiber orientation on cracking and permeability of reinforced concrete under tensile loading. Cem Concr Res 94:59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mlekusch B (1999) Thermoelastic properties of short-fibre-reinforced thermoplastics. Compos Sci Technol 59(6):911–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yoo D-Y, Kang S-T, Yoon Y-S (2016) Enhancing the flexural performance of ultra-high-performance concrete using long steel fibers. Compos Struct 147:220–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Krenchel H (1975) Fibre spacing and specific fibre surface. Fibre Reinforced Cement and Concrete: 69–79Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Laranjeira F, Grünewald S, Walraven J, Blom C, Molins C, Aguado A (2011) Characterization of the orientation profile of steel fiber reinforced concrete. Mater Struct 44(6):1093–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Eik M (2014) Orientation of short steel fibres in concrete: measuring and modelling. Ph. D. thesis of Aalto UniversityGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Massicotte B, Conciatori D, Bédard S, Braike S (2014) Analyse Inélastique des Sections V3.1. Groupe de recherche en génie des structures, École Polytechnique de Montréal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    di Prisco M, Colombo M, Dozio D (2013) Fibre-reinforced concrete in fib Model Code 2010: principles, models and test validation. Struct Concr 14(4):342–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Blanco A, Pujadas P, de la Fuente A, Cavalaro S, Aguado A (2013) Application of constitutive models in European codes to RC–FRC. Constr Build Mater 40:246–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Monsó Varona A (2011) Analysis of the behavior of fiber reinforced concrete for Barcelona and bending test. M. Sc. thesis, Escola tècnica superior d’enginyers de camins, Barcelona, Spane, (in Spanish) Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wille K, Parra-Montesinos GJ (2012) Effect of beam size, casting method, and support conditions on flexural behavior of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete. ACI Mater J 109(3):379–388Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nour A, Massicotte B, de Montaignac R, Charron J-P (2015) Development of an inverse analysis procedure for the characterisation of softening diagrams for FRC beams and panels. Constr Build Mater 94:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    AFGC-BFUP (2013) Ultra-high performance fibre-reinforced concretes. Recommendations. AFGC Publication, FranceGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil, Geological and Mining Engineering, Research Center on Concrete Infrastructures (CRIB)Polytechnique MontrealMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations