Evaluation of accelerated carbonation curing in cement-bonded balsa particleboard

  • Matheus Roberto Cabral
  • Erika Yukari Nakanishi
  • Valdemir dos Santos
  • Christian Gauss
  • Sérgio Francisco dos Santos
  • Juliano Fiorelli
Original Article
  • 137 Downloads

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the potential usage of balsa wood to produce cement-bonded particleboards as well as to study the effects of accelerated carbonation on the cement-bonded balsa particleboard. Particleboards were subjected to two different curing conditions, (1) conventional curing: control—curing for 48 h in a climatic chamber, followed by 25 days in a saturated environment (98 ± 2%) in sealed plastic bags at 23 °C, (2) accelerated carbonation—curing for 48 h in a climatic chamber, and then in environment with CO2 (24 h concentration of 15%), followed by 24 days in a saturated environment (98 ± 2%) in sealed plastic bags at 23 °C. After 28 days of curing, the particleboards degree of carbonation was evaluated by TG-DTG and XRD analysis. Thermal, physical and mechanical characterizations were conducted following the recommendations of ASTM-E1530 and DIN: 310, 322, 323 standards, respectively. Accelerated carbonation decreased the portlandite content and increased of calcium carbonate content of the studied particleboards. Thermal properties showed that the particleboards could be used as an insulation material in accordance to European Standard (BS EN 13986). Physical and mechanical properties of the studied materials showed that they are potential building particleboard, because this material satisfied the requirements of ISO 8335 standard.

Keywords

Accelerated carbonation Forestry products Wood Portland cement Cement composites 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are sincerely thankful to the Brazilian financial support from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brazil) [Grant Nos. 464532/2014-0 and 312151/2016-0] and company Infibra S.A. Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, Brazil) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) [Grant No. 2016/07372-9].

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Frybort S, Mauritz R, Teischinger A, Müller U (2008) Cement bonded composites—a mechanical review. BioResources 3:602–626Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nasser RA, Salem MZM, Al-Mefarrej HA, Aref IM (2016) Use of tree pruning wastes for manufacturing of wood reinforced cement composites. Cem Concr Compos 72:246–256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kalaycıoglu H, Nemli G (2006) Producing composite particleboard from kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) stalks. Ind Crops Prod 24:177–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2006.03.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nozahic V, Amziane S (2012) Influence of sunflower aggregates surface treatments on physical properties and adhesion with a mineral binder. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 43:1837–1849.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guntekin E, Karakus B (2008) Feasibility of using eggplant (Solanum melongena) stalks in the production of experimental particleboard. Ind Crops Prod 27:354–358.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2007.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Babatunde A (2011) Durability characteristics of cement-bonded particleboards manufactured from maize stalk residue. J For Res 22:111–115.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-011-0135-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhou XW, Zheng F, Li HG, Lu CL (2010) An environment-friendly thermal insulation material from cotton stalk fibers. Energy Build 42:1070–1074.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.01.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aggarwal LK, Agrawal SP, Thapliyal PC, Karade SR (2008) Cement-bonded composite boards with arhar stalks. Cem Concr Compos 30:44–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ashori A, Tabarsa T, Sepahvand S (2012) Cement-bonded composite boards made from poplar strands. Constr Build Mater 26:131–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.001 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Borrega M, Ahvenainen P, Serimaa R, Gibson L (2015) Composition and structure of balsa (Ochroma pyramidale) wood. Wood Sci Technol 49:403–420.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-015-0700-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fengel D, Wegener G (2003) Wood: chemistry, ultrastructure, reactions. Verlag Kessel, RemagenGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hu XP, Hsieh YL (2001) Effects of dehydration on the crystalline structure and strength of developing cotton fibers. Text Res J Princet 71:231–239.  https://doi.org/10.1177/004051750107100308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Almeida AEFS, Tonoli GHD, Santos SF, Savastano H Jr (2013) Improved durability of vegetable fiber reinforced cement composite subject to accelerated carbonation at early age. Cem Concr Compos 42:49–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Santos SF, Schmidt R, Almeida AEFS, Tonoli GHD, Savastano H Jr (2015) Supercritical carbonation treatment on extruded fibre-cement reinforced with vegetable fibres. Cem Concr Compos 56:84–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cuéllar-Franca RM, Azapagic A (2015) Carbon capture, storage and utilisation technologies: a critical analysis and comparison of their life cycle environmental impacts. J CO2 Util 9:82–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2014.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fernández Bertos M, Simons SJR, Hills CD, Carey PJ (2004) A review of accelerated carbonation technology in the treatment of cement-based materials and sequestration of CO2. J Hazard Mater 112:193–205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.04.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Borges PHR, Costa JO, Milestone NB, Lynsdale CJ, Streatfield RE (2010) Carbonation of CH and C–S–H in composite cement pastes containing high amounts of BFS. Cem Concr Res 40:284–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.10.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang L, Chen SS, Tsang DCW, Poon C-S, Dai J-G (2017) CO2 curing and fibre reinforcement for green recycling of contaminated wood into high-performance cement-bonded particleboards. J CO2 Util 18:107–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2017.01.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    NBR 5733 (1991) Cimento portland com alta resistencia inicial. Rio de Janeiro, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Morais JPS, Rosa MF, Marconcini JM (2010) Procedimentos para análise lignocelulósica. Embrapa Algodão, p 54Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tappi T 222 om-88 (1988) Acid-insoluble lignin in wood and pulpGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tappi T 204 cm-97 (2007) Solvent extractives of wood and pulpGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Langford JI, Wilson AJC (1978) Scherrer after sixty years: a survey and some new results in the determination of crystallite size. J Appl Crystallogr 11:102–113.  https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889878012844 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21:885–896.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0030-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nam S, French AD, Condon BD, Concha M (2016) Segal crystallinity index revisited by the simulation of X-ray diffraction patterns of cotton cellulose and cellulose II. Carbohydr Polym 135:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nishiyama Y, Langan P, Chanzy H (2002) Crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 124:9074–9082.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0257319 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hachmi M, Moslemi AA, Campbell AG (1990) A new technique to classify the compatibility of wood with cement. Wood Sci Technol 24:345–354.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cabral MR, Nakanishi EY, Fiorelli J (2017) Evaluation of the effect of accelerated carbonation in cement-bagasse panels after cycles of wetting and drying. J Mater Civ Eng 29:04017018.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001861 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mohr BJ, Biernacki JJ, Kurtis KE (2007) Supplementary cementitious materials for mitigating degradation of kraft pulp fiber-cement composites. Cem Concr Res 37:1531–1543.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    ASTM E1530 (2011) Standard test method for evaluating the resistance to thermal transmission of materials by the guarded heat flow meter technique. Philadelphia, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    DIN EN 322 (1993) Wood-based panels. Determination of moisture content. Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    DIN EN 323 (1993) Wood-based panels. Determination of density. Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    DIN EN 310 (1993) Wood-based panels. Determination of modulus of elasticity in bending and of bending strength. Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Semple KE, Cunningham RB, Evans PD (2002) The suitability of five Western Australian mallee eucalypt species for wood-cement composites. Ind Crops Prod 16:89–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6690(02)00012-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Malek S, Gibson LJ (2017) Multi-scale modelling of elastic properties of balsa. Int J Solids Struct 113–114:118–131.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.01.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fiorelli J, Gomide CA, Lahr FAR, Nascimento MF, Sartori DL, Ballesteros JEM, Bueno SB, Belini UL (2014) Physico-chemical and anatomical characterization of residual lignocellulosic fibers. Cellulose 21:3269–3277.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0398-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fan M, Ndikontar MK, Zhou X, Ngamveng JN (2012) Cement-bonded composites made from tropical woods: compatibility of wood and cement. Constr Build Mater 36:135–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jorge FC, Pereira C, Ferreira JMF (2004) Wood-cement composites: a review. Holz Roh Werkst 62:370–377.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-004-0501-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chakraborty S, Kundu SP, Roy A, Adhikari B, Majumder SB (2013) Effect of jute as fiber reinforcement controlling the hydration characteristics of cement matrix. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:1252–1260.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie300607r CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Moniruzzaman M, Ono T (2013) Separation and characterization of cellulose fibers from cypress wood treated with ionic liquid prior to laccase treatment. Bioresour Technol 127:132–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wikberg H, Maunu SL (2004) Characterisation of thermally modified hard- and softwoods by 13C CPMAS NMR. Carbohydr Polym 58:461–466.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.08.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Penttilä PA, Kilpeläinen P, Tolonen L, Suuronen JP, Sixta H, Willför S, Serimaa R (2013) Effects of pressurized hot water extraction on the nanoscale structure of birch sawdust. Cellulose 20:2335–2347.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0001-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Andersson S, Wikberg H, Pesonen E, Maunu SL, Serimaa R (2004) Studies of crystallinity of Scots pine and Norway spruce cellulose. Trees Struct Funct 18:346–353.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-003-0312-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Correia VC, Santos V, Sain M, Santos SF, Leão AL, Savastano H Jr (2016) Grinding process for the production of nanofibrillated cellulose based on unbleached and bleached bamboo organosolv pulp. Cellulose 23:2971–2987.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0996-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Borrega M, Gibson LJ (2015) Mechanics of balsa (Ochroma pyramidale) wood. Mech Mater 84(75–90):015.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.01.014 Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rostami V, Shao Y, Boyd AJ, He Z (2012) Microstructure of cement paste subject to early carbonation curing. Cem Concr Res 42:186–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.09.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Taylor HFW (1997) Cement chemistry. ThomasTelford, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pizzol VD, Mendes LM, Frezzatti L, Savastano H Jr, Tonoli GHD (2014) Effect of accelerated carbonation on the microstructure and physical properties of hybrid fiber-cement composites. Miner Eng 59:101–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2013.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Young R (1993) The rietveld method. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wang L, Chen SS, Tsang DCW, Poon CS, Shih K (2016) Value-added recycling of construction waste wood into noise and thermal insulating cement-bonded particleboards. Constr Build Mater 125:316–325.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Khedari J, Suttisonk B, Pratinthong N, Hirunlabh J (2001) New lightweight composite construction materials with low thermal conductivity. Cem Concr Compos 23:65–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(00)00072-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    BSI, BS EN 13986 (2004) Wood-based panels for use in construction—characteristics, evaluation of conformity and markingGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Xu Y, Chung DDL (2000) Effect of sand addition on the specific heat and thermal conductivity of cement. Cem Concr Res 30:59–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00206-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    ISO 8335 (1987) Cement-bonded particleboards—boards of Portland or equivalent cement reinforced with fibrous wood particles. SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ferraz JM, Menezzi CHS, Teixeira DE, Martins SA (2011) Effects of treatment of coir fiber and cement/fiber ratio on properties of cement-bonded composites. BioResources 6:3481–3492.  https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.6.3.3481-3492 Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Okino EYA, Souza MR, Santana MAE, Alves MVS, Sousa ME, Teixeira DE (2004) Cement-bonded wood particleboard with a mixture of eucalypt and rubberwood. Cem Concr Compos 26:729–734.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(03)00061-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Cabral MR, Nakanishi EY, Fiorelli J (In press) Cement-bonded panels produced with sugarcane bagasse cured by accelerated carbonation. J Mater Civ Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002301

Copyright information

© RILEM 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biosystems EngineeringUniversity of Sao PauloPirassunungaBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Materials and Technology, School of EngineeringSao Paulo State UniversityGuaratinguetáBrazil

Personalised recommendations