Abstract
Soap formation in traditional oil paintings occurs when heavy-metal-containing pigments, such as lead white, 2Pb(CO3)2·Pb(OH)2, and lead-tin yellow type I, Pb2SnO4, react with fatty acids in the binding medium. These soaps may form aggregates that can be 100-200 μm in diameter, which swell and protrude through the paint surface, resulting in the degradation of the paint film and damage to the integrity of the artwork. In addition, soap formation has been reported to play a role in the increased transparency of paint films that allows the painting support, the preparatory drawing, and the artists’ alterations to become visible to the naked eye. The factors that trigger soap formation and the mechanism(s) of the process are not yet well understood. To elucidate these issues, chemical and structural information is necessary which can be obtained by solid-state 207Pb, 119Sn, and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). In the present study, a combination of 207Pb NMR pulse sequences was used to determine accurately the NMR parameters of lead-containing pigments and lead carboxylates known to be involved in soap formation, such as lead palmitate, lead stearate, and lead azelate. These results show that the local coordination environment of lead azelate is different from lead palmitate or lead stearate and therefore it is unlikely that lead azelate would be incorporated into an ordered structure containing lead palmitate and lead stearate. In addition, the chemical shifts of the pigments obtained are different from those of the soaps, demonstrating that 207Pb NMR is useful in characterizing the components when present in a mixture, such as a paint film. The NMR methods discussed can also be applied to other Pb-containing cultural heritage materials, electronic and optoelectronic materials, superconducting materials, and environmentally contaminated materials.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
- 1.
P. Noble, J. J. Boon and J. Wadum, ArtMatters 1, 46–61 (2003).
- 2.
K. Keune, PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam, 2005.
- 3.
M. Spring, C. Ricci, D. Peggie and S. Kazarian, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 392 (1), 37–45 (2008).
- 4.
C. Higgitt, M. Spring and D. Saunders, National Gallery Technical Bulletin 24, 75–95 (2003).
- 5.
S. A. Centeno and D. Mahon, The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin 67 (1), 12–19 (2009).
- 6.
C. Hale, J. Arslanoglu and S. A. Centeno, in Studying Old Master Paintings. Technology and Practice, edited by M. Spring (Archetype Publications and The National Gallery, London, 2011), pp. 59–64.
- 7.
J. Van der Weerd, PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam, 2002.
- 8.
J. J. Boon, J. van der Weerd, K. Keune, P. Noble and J. Wadum, in ICOM-CC 13th Triennial Meeting (Rio de Janeiro, 2002), Vol. 1, pp. 410–406.
- 9.
A. Eibner, Malmaterialienkunde als Grundlage der Maltechnik. (Verlag von Julius Springer, Berlin, 1909), pp. 121.
- 10.
P. Noble, A. van Loon and J. J. Boon, in ICOM Committee for Conservation 14th Triennnial Meeting (James and James, The Hague, 2005), Vol. 1, pp. 496–503.
- 11.
A. van Loon, PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam, 2008.
- 12.
F. Fayon, I. Farnan, C. Bessada, J. Coutures, D. Massiot and J. P. Coutures, Journal of the American Chemical Society 119 (29), 6837–6843 (1997).
- 13.
C. Dybowski and G. Neue, Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 41 (3–4), 153–170 (2002).
- 14.
O. Dmitrenko, S. Bai, P. A. Beckmann, S. van Bramer, A. J. Vega and C. Dybowski, Journal of Physical Chemistry A 112 (14), 3046–3052 (2008).
- 15.
J. Catalano, Y. Yao, A. Murphy, N. Zumbulyadis, S. A. Centeno and C. Dybowski, Applied Spectroscopy 68 (3), 280–286 (2014).
- 16.
G. Neue, C. Dybowski, M. L. Smith, M. A. Hepp and D. L. Perry, Solid State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance 6 (3), 241–250 (1996).
- 17.
A. W. MacGregor, L. A. O’Dell and R. W. Schurko, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 208 (1), 103–113 (2011).
- 18.
K. Eichele, HBA 3.1 and WSOLIDS, University of Tubingen, 2013.
- 19.
K. Keune and J. J. Boon, Stud. Conserv. 52 (3), 161–176 (2007).
- 20.
M. J. Plater, B. De Silva, T. Gelbrich, M. B. Hursthouse, C. L. Higgitt and D. R. Saunders, Polyhedron 22 (24), 3171–3179 (2003).
- 21.
P. Martinetto, M. Anne, E. Dooryhée, P. Walter and G. Tsoucaris, Acta Crystallographica Section C 58 (6), i82–i84 (2002).
- 22.
M. A. Verhoeven, Carlyle, L., Reedijk, J., Haasnoot, J.G., in Reporting Higlights of the De mayerne Programme., edited by J. J. a. F. Boon, E.S.B. (The Hague: Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Reserach (NWO). 2006), pp. 33–42.
- 23.
B. Keisch, in Studies in the History of Art (1971–1972), Vol. 4, pp. 121–133.
- 24.
J. R. Gavarri, J. P. Vigouroux, G. Calvarin and A. W. Hewat, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 36 (1), 81–90 (1981).
- 25.
S. P. Gabuda, S. G. Kozlova, V. V. Terskikh, C. Dybowski, G. Neue and D. L. Perry, Solid State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance 15 (2), 103–107 (1999).
- 26.
R. J. H. Clark, L. Cridland, B. M. Kariuki, K. D. M. Harris and R. Withnall, Journal of the Chemical Society. Dalton Transactions. (16), 2577–2582 (1995).
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Catalano, J., Yao, Y., Murphy, A. et al. Analysis of Lead Carboxylates and Lead-Containing Pigments in Oil Paintings by Solid- State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. MRS Online Proceedings Library 1656, 371–379 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1557/opl.2014.707
Published:
Issue Date: