Computational Study of the Electronic Performance of Cross-Plane Superlattice Peltier Devices


We use a state-of-the-art non-equilibrium quantum transport simulation code, NEMO-1D, to address the device physics and performance benchmarking of cross-plane superlattice Peltier coolers. Our findings show quantitatively how barriers in cross-plane superlattices degrade the electrical performance, i.e. power factor. The performance of an In0.53Ga0.47As/In0.52Al0.48As cross-plane SL Peltier cooler is lower than that of either a bulk In0.53Ga0.47As or bulk In0.52Al0.48As device, mainly due to quantum mechanical effects. We find that a cross-plane SL device has a Seebeck coefficient vs. conductance tradeoff that is no better than that of a bulk device. The effects of tunneling and phase coherence between multi barriers are examined. It is shown that tunneling, SL contacts, and coherency only produce oscillatory behavior of Seebeck coefficient vs. conductance without a significant gain in PF. The overall TE device performance is, therefore, a compromise between the enhanced Seebeck coefficient and degraded conductance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. [1]

    A. Majumdar, “MATERIALS SCIENCE: Enhanced: Thermoelectricity in Semiconductor Nanostructures,” Science, vol. 303, Feb. 2004, pp. 777–778.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. [2]

    G.J. Snyder and E.S. Toberer, “Complex thermoelectric materials,” Nat Mater, vol. 7, Feb. 2008, pp. 105–114.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. [3]

    G. Chen, M.S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, J.P. Fleurial, and T. Caillat, “Recent developments in thermoelectric materials,” International Materials Reviews, vol. 48, 2003, p. 45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. [4]

    R. Venkatasubramanian, E. Siivola, T. Colpitts, and B. O’Quinn, “Thin-film thermoelectric devices with high room-temperature figures of merit,” Nature, vol. 413, Oct. 2001, pp. 597–602.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. [5]

    L.D. Hicks, T.C. Harman, and M.S. Dresselhaus, “Use of quantum-well superlattices to obtain a high figure of merit from nonconventional thermoelectric materials,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 63, Dec. 1993, pp. 3230–3232.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. [6]

    L.D. Hicks and M.S. Dresselhaus, “Effect of quantum-well structures on the thermoelectric figure of merit,” Physical Review B, vol. 47, May. 1993, p. 12727.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. [7]

    L.W. Whitlow and T. Hirano, “Superlattice applications to thermoelectricity,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 78, 1995, p. 5460.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. [8]

    G.D. Mahan and L.M. Woods, “Multilayer Thermionic Refrigeration,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 80, May. 1998, p. 4016.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. [9]

    A. Shakouri, C. LaBounty, J. Piprek, P. Abraham, and J.E. Bowers, “Thermionic emission cooling in single barrier heterostructures,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 74, 1999, p. 88.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. [10]

    W. Kim, J. Zide, A. Gossard, D. Klenov, S. Stemmer, A. Shakouri, and A. Majumdar, “Thermal Conductivity Reduction and Thermoelectric Figure of Merit Increase by Embedding Nanoparticles in Crystalline Semiconductors,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 96, Feb. 2006, p. 045901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. [11]

    J. Zide, D. Vashaee, Z.X. Bian, G. Zeng, J.E. Bowers, A. Shakouri, and A.C. Gossard, “Demonstration of electron filtering to increase the Seebeck coefficient in In0.53Ga 0.47As/In0.53Ga0.28Al0.19As superlattices,” Physical Review B, vol. 74, Nov. 2006, pp. 205335–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. [12]

    J.P. Heremans, C.M. Thrush, and D.T. Morelli, “Thermopower enhancement in lead telluride nanostructures,” Physical Review B, vol. 70, 2004, p. 115334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. [13]

    G. Klimeck, R. Lake, R.C. Bowen, W.R. Frensley, and T.S. Moise, “Quantum device simulation with a generalized tunneling formula,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 67, 1995, pp. 2539–2541.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. [14]

    G. Klimeck, R. Lake, R.C. Bowen, W.R. Frensley, and D. Blanks, “Nano electronic modelling (NEMO),” Device Research Conference, 1995. Digest. 1995 53rd Annual, IEEE, 2002, pp. 52–53.

  15. [15]

    G. Klimeck, “NEMO 1-D: the first NEGF-based TCAD tool,” Simulation of semiconductor processes and devices 2004: SISPAD 2004, 2004, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. [16]

    R. Kim, C. Jeong, and M.S. Lundstrom, “On momentum conservation and thermionic emission cooling,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 107, 2010, p. 054502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changwook Jeong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeong, C., Klimeck, G. & Lundstrom, M. Computational Study of the Electronic Performance of Cross-Plane Superlattice Peltier Devices. MRS Online Proceedings Library 1314, 509 (2011).

Download citation