Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Computational Study of the Electronic Performance of Cross-Plane Superlattice Peltier Devices

  • Published:
MRS Online Proceedings Library Aims and scope

Abstract

We use a state-of-the-art non-equilibrium quantum transport simulation code, NEMO-1D, to address the device physics and performance benchmarking of cross-plane superlattice Peltier coolers. Our findings show quantitatively how barriers in cross-plane superlattices degrade the electrical performance, i.e. power factor. The performance of an In0.53Ga0.47As/In0.52Al0.48As cross-plane SL Peltier cooler is lower than that of either a bulk In0.53Ga0.47As or bulk In0.52Al0.48As device, mainly due to quantum mechanical effects. We find that a cross-plane SL device has a Seebeck coefficient vs. conductance tradeoff that is no better than that of a bulk device. The effects of tunneling and phase coherence between multi barriers are examined. It is shown that tunneling, SL contacts, and coherency only produce oscillatory behavior of Seebeck coefficient vs. conductance without a significant gain in PF. The overall TE device performance is, therefore, a compromise between the enhanced Seebeck coefficient and degraded conductance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Majumdar, “MATERIALS SCIENCE: Enhanced: Thermoelectricity in Semiconductor Nanostructures,” Science, vol. 303, Feb. 2004, pp. 777–778.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. G.J. Snyder and E.S. Toberer, “Complex thermoelectric materials,” Nat Mater, vol. 7, Feb. 2008, pp. 105–114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Chen, M.S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, J.P. Fleurial, and T. Caillat, “Recent developments in thermoelectric materials,” International Materials Reviews, vol. 48, 2003, p. 45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Venkatasubramanian, E. Siivola, T. Colpitts, and B. O’Quinn, “Thin-film thermoelectric devices with high room-temperature figures of merit,” Nature, vol. 413, Oct. 2001, pp. 597–602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. L.D. Hicks, T.C. Harman, and M.S. Dresselhaus, “Use of quantum-well superlattices to obtain a high figure of merit from nonconventional thermoelectric materials,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 63, Dec. 1993, pp. 3230–3232.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. L.D. Hicks and M.S. Dresselhaus, “Effect of quantum-well structures on the thermoelectric figure of merit,” Physical Review B, vol. 47, May. 1993, p. 12727.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. L.W. Whitlow and T. Hirano, “Superlattice applications to thermoelectricity,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 78, 1995, p. 5460.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. G.D. Mahan and L.M. Woods, “Multilayer Thermionic Refrigeration,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 80, May. 1998, p. 4016.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Shakouri, C. LaBounty, J. Piprek, P. Abraham, and J.E. Bowers, “Thermionic emission cooling in single barrier heterostructures,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 74, 1999, p. 88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. W. Kim, J. Zide, A. Gossard, D. Klenov, S. Stemmer, A. Shakouri, and A. Majumdar, “Thermal Conductivity Reduction and Thermoelectric Figure of Merit Increase by Embedding Nanoparticles in Crystalline Semiconductors,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 96, Feb. 2006, p. 045901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Zide, D. Vashaee, Z.X. Bian, G. Zeng, J.E. Bowers, A. Shakouri, and A.C. Gossard, “Demonstration of electron filtering to increase the Seebeck coefficient in In0.53Ga 0.47As/In0.53Ga0.28Al0.19As superlattices,” Physical Review B, vol. 74, Nov. 2006, pp. 205335–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J.P. Heremans, C.M. Thrush, and D.T. Morelli, “Thermopower enhancement in lead telluride nanostructures,” Physical Review B, vol. 70, 2004, p. 115334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. G. Klimeck, R. Lake, R.C. Bowen, W.R. Frensley, and T.S. Moise, “Quantum device simulation with a generalized tunneling formula,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 67, 1995, pp. 2539–2541.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. G. Klimeck, R. Lake, R.C. Bowen, W.R. Frensley, and D. Blanks, “Nano electronic modelling (NEMO),” Device Research Conference, 1995. Digest. 1995 53rd Annual, IEEE, 2002, pp. 52–53.

  15. G. Klimeck, “NEMO 1-D: the first NEGF-based TCAD tool,” Simulation of semiconductor processes and devices 2004: SISPAD 2004, 2004, p. 9.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Kim, C. Jeong, and M.S. Lundstrom, “On momentum conservation and thermionic emission cooling,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 107, 2010, p. 054502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Network for Computational Nanotechnology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA

    Changwook Jeong, Gerhard Klimeck & Mark Lundstrom

Authors
  1. Changwook Jeong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gerhard Klimeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mark Lundstrom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeong, C., Klimeck, G. & Lundstrom, M. Computational Study of the Electronic Performance of Cross-Plane Superlattice Peltier Devices. MRS Online Proceedings Library 1314, 509 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1557/opl.2011.509

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/opl.2011.509

Search

Navigation