Impurity stabilization of nanocrystalline grains in pulsed laser deposited tantalum

Abstract

Thermal stability of pulsed laser deposited (PLD) nanocrystalline tantalum was explored through in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM) annealing over the temperature range of 800–1200 °C. The evolution of the nanostructure was characterized using grain size distributions collectively with electron diffraction analysis and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS). Grain growth dynamics were further explored through molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of columnar tantalum nanostructures. The as-deposited grain size of 32 nm increased by only 18% at 1200 °C, i.e., 40% the melting point of tantalum, conflicting with the MD simulations that demonstrated extensive grain coalescence above 1000 °C. Furthermore, the grain size remained stable through the reversible α-to-β phase transition near 800 °C, which is often accompanied by grain growth in nanostructured tantalum. The EELS analysis confirmed the presence of oxygen impurities in the as-deposited films, indicating that impurity stabilization of grain boundaries was responsible for the exceptional thermal stability of PLD nanocrystalline tantalum.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

FIG. 1
FIG. 2
FIG. 3
FIG. 4
FIG. 5
FIG. 6
FIG. 7
FIG. 8

References

  1. 1.

    B.E. Schuster, J.P. Ligda, Z.L. Pan, and Q. Wei: Nanocrystalline refractory metals for extreme condition applications. JOM 63, 27 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    E.M. Bringa, A. Caro, Y.M. Wang, M. Victoria, J.M. McNaney, B.A. Remington, R.F. Smith, B.R. Torralva, and H. Van Swygenhoven: Ultrahigh strength in nanocrystalline materials under shock loading. Science 309, 1838 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    I.J. Beyerlein, A. Caro, M.J. Demkowicz, N.A. Mara, A. Misra, and B.P. Uberuaga: Radiation damage tolerant nanomaterials. Mater. Today 16, 443 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    J.M. Dake and C.E. Krill, III: Sudden loss of thermal stability in Fe-based nanocrystalline alloys. Scr. Mater. 66, 390 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    M. Ames, J. Markmann, R. Karos, A. Michels, A. Tschope, and R. Birringer: Unraveling the nature of room temperature grain growth in nanocrystalline materials. Acta Mater. 56, 4255 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    G.D. Hibbard, J.L. McCrea, G. Palumbo, K.T. Aust, and U. Erb: An initial analysis of mechanisms leading to late stage abnormal grain growth in nanocrystalline Ni. Scr. Mater. 47, 83 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    T. Chookajorn, H.A. Murdoch, and C.A. Schuh: Design of stable nanocrystalline alloys. Science 337, 951 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    K.A. Darling, M.A. Tschopp, B.K. VanLeeuwen, M.A. Atwater, and Z.K. Liu: Mitigating grain growth in binary nanocrystalline alloys through solute selection based on thermodynamic stability maps. Comput. Mater. Sci. 84, 255 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    J. Weissmuller: Alloy effects in nanostructures. Nanostruct. Mater. 3, 261 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    R. Kirchheim: Grain coarsening inhibited by solute segregation. Acta Mater. 50, 413 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    J.R. Trelewicz and C.A. Schuh: Grain boundary segregation and thermodynamically stable binary nanocrystalline alloys. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 79, 094112 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    C.C. Koch, R.O. Scattergood, M. Saber, and H. Kotan: High temperature stabilization of nanocrystalline grain size: Thermodynamic versus kinetic strategies. J. Mater. Res. 28, 1785 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    A. Michels, C.E. Krill, H. Ehrhardt, R. Birringer, and D.T. Wu: Modelling the influence of grain-size-dependent solute drag on the kinetics of grain growth in nanocrystalline materials. Acta Mater. 47, 2143 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    B.G. Clark, K. Hattar, M.T. Marshall, T. Chookajorn, B.L. Boyce, and C.A. Schuh: Thermal stability comparison of nanocrystalline Fe-based binary alloy pairs. JOM 68, 1625 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    S.N. Mathaudhu and K.T. Hartwig: Grain refinement and recrystallization of heavily worked tantalum. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 426, 128 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    M. Bischof, S. Mayer, H. Leitner, H. Clemens, P. Staron, E. Geiger, A. Voiticek, and W. Knabl: On the development of grain growth resistant tantalum alloys. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 24, 437 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    B.R. Levine, S. Sporer, R.A. Poggie, C.J. Della Valle, and J.J. Jacobs: Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery. Biomaterials 27, 4671 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    J.P. Strachan, A.C. Torrezan, G. Medeiros-Ribeiro, and R.S. Williams: Measuring the switching dynamics and energy efficiency of tantalum oxide memristors. Nanotechnology 22 (2011).

  19. 19.

    S.H. Yoo, T.S. Sudarshan, K. Sethuram, G. Subhash, and R.J. Dowding: Consolidation and high strain rate mechanical behavior of nanocrystalline tantalum powder. Nanostruct. Mater. 12, 23 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    M. Zhang, B. Yang, J. Chu, and T.G. Nieh: Hardness enhancement in nanocrystalline tantalum thin films. Scr. Mater. 54, 1227 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Q. Wei, T. Jiao, S.N. Mathaudhu, E. Ma, K.T. Hartwig, and K.T. Ramesh: Microstructure and mechanical properties of tantalum after equal channel angular extrusion (ECAE). Mater. Sci. Eng., A 358, 266 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    G. Guisbiers, E. Herth, L. Buchaillot, and T. Pardoen: Fracture toughness, hardness, and Young’s modulus of tantalum nanocrystalline films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 (2010).

  23. 23.

    Z.L. Pan, Y.L. Li, and Q. Wei: Tensile properties of nanocrystalline tantalum from molecular dynamics simulations. Acta Mater. 56, 3470 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    J.P. Ligda, B.E. Schuster, and Q. Wei: Transition in the deformation mode of nanocrystalline tantalum processed by high-pressure torsion. Scr. Mater. 67, 253 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Y.M. Wang, A.M. Hodge, J. Biener, A.V. Hamza, D.E. Barnes, K. Liu, and T.G. Nieh: Deformation twinning during nanoindentation of nanocrystalline Ta. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 101915 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Q. Wei, Z.L. Pan, X.L. Wu, B.E. Schuster, L.J. Kecskes, and R.Z. Valiev: Microstructure and mechanical properties at different length scales and strain rates of nanocrystalline tantalum produced by high-pressure torsion. Acta Mater. 59, 2423 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    A. Javed, H.G. Durrani, and C. Zhu: The effect of vacuum annealing on the microstructure, mechanical and electrical properties of tantalum films. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 54, 154 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    M.H. Read and D.H. Hensler: X-ray analysis of sputtered films of beta-tantalum and body-centered cubic tantalum. Thin Solid Films 10, 123 (1972).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    A.A. Navid and A.M. Hodge: Nanostructured alpha and beta tantalum formation—Relationship between plasma parameters and microstructure. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 536, 49 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    L.A. Clevenger, A. Mutscheller, J.M.E. Harper, C. Cabral, Jr, and K. Barmak: The relationship between deposition conditions, the beta to alpha phase transformation, and stress relaxation in tantalum thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 72, 4918 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    M. Zhang, Y.F. Zhang, P.D. Rack, M.K. Miller, and T.G. Nieh: Nanocrystalline tetragonal tantalum thin films. Scr. Mater. 57, 1032 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    H.A. Murdoch and C.A. Schuh: Stability of binary nanocrystalline alloys against grain growth and phase separation. Acta Mater. 61, 2121 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    R. Dannenberg, E.A. Stach, J.R. Groza, and B.J. Dresser: In situ TEM observations of abnormal grain growth, coarsening, and substrate de-wetting in nanocrystalline Ag thin films. Thin Solid Films 370, 54 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    L.N. Brewer, D.M. Follstaedt, K. Hattar, J.A. Knapp, M.A. Rodriguez, and I.M. Robertson: Competitive abnormal grain growth between allotropic phases in nanocrystalline nickel. Adv. Mater. 22, 1161 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    J.G. Brons and G.B. Thompson: A comparison of grain boundary evolution during grain growth in fcc metals. Acta Mater. 61, 3936 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    J. Kacher, I.M. Robertson, M. Nowell, J. Knapp, and K. Hattar: Study of rapid grain boundary migration in a nanocrystalline Ni thin film. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528, 1628 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    P. Choi, M. da Silva, U. Klement, T. Al-Kassab, and R. Kirchheim: Thermal stability of electrodeposited nanocrystalline Co-1.1 at.% P. Acta Mater. 53, 4473 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    O.K. Donaldson, K. Hattar, and J.R. Trelewicz: Metastable tantalum oxide formation during the devitrification of amorphous tantalum thin films. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 99, 3775 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    K. Hattar, D.M. Follstaedt, J.A. Knapp, and I.M. Robertson: Defect structures created during abnormal grain growth in pulsed-laser deposited nickel. Acta Mater. 56, 794 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    A.J. Detor and C.A. Schuh: Microstructural evolution during the heat treatment of nanocrystalline alloys. J. Mater. Res. 22, 15 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    J. Edington: Practical Electron Microscopy in Materials Science (van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    S. Plimpton: Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    A.J. Haslam, S.R. Phillpot, H. Wolf, D. Moldovan, and H. Gleiter: Mechanisms of grain growth in nanocrystalline fcc metals by molecular-dynamics simulation. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 318, 293 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    A.G. Froseth, H. Van Swygenhoven, and P.M. Derlet: Developing realistic grain boundary networks for use in molecular dynamics simulations. Acta Mater. 53, 4847 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    R. Ravelo, T.C. Germann, O. Guerrero, Q. An, and B.L. Holian: Shock-induced plasticity in tantalum single crystals: Interatomic potentials and large-scale molecular-dynamics simulations. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter 88, 134101 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    A. Stukowski: Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO-the open visualization tool. Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18, 015012 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    A. Stukowski: Structure identification methods for atomistic simulations of crystalline materials. Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 20, 045021 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    D.H. Lowndes, D.B. Geohegan, A.A. Puretzky, D.P. Norton, and C.M. Rouleau: Synthesis of novel thin-film materials by pulsed laser deposition. Science 273, 898 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    K.L. Chopra: Thin Film Phenomena, 1st ed. (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    S. Schaltin, L. D’Urzo, Q. Zhao, A. Vantomme, H. Plank, G. Kothleitner, C. Gspan, K. Binnemans, and J. Fransaer: Direct electroplating of copper on tantalum from ionic liquids in high vacuum: Origin of the tantalum oxide layer. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 13624 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    G.P. Williams: X-ray Data Booklet (Central for X-Ray Optics and Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkley National Laboratory, Berkeley, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    F. Tang, D.S. Gianola, M.P. Moody, K.J. Hemker, and J.M. Cairney: Observations of grain boundary impurities in nanocrystalline Al and their influence on microstructural stability and mechanical behaviour. Acta Mater. 60, 1038 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    C.J. Marvel, D. Yin, P.R. Cantwell, and M.P. Harmer: The influence of oxygen contamination on the thermal stability and hardness of nanocrystalline Ni–W alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 664, 49 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    A.J. Detor, M.K. Miller, and C.A. Schuh: Solute distribution in nanocrystalline Ni–W alloys examined through atom probe tomography. Philos. Mag. 86, 4459 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    A.J. Detor and C.A. Schuh: Grain boundary segregation, chemical ordering and stability of nanocrystalline alloys: Atomistic computer simulations in the Ni–W system. Acta Mater. 55, 4221 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    L.G. Feinstein and R.D. Huttemann: Factors controlling structure of sputtered Ta films. Thin Solid Films 16, 129 (1973).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Support for this work was provided for OKD, WW, and JRT by the National Science Foundation through Grant DMR-1410941. The authors gratefully acknowledge Michael Marshall of the Radiation–Solid Interaction Group at Sandia National Laboratories for his assistance in the preparation of the PLD samples and Dr. Eric Stach of the Center for Functional Nanomaterials at Brookhaven National Laboratory for his help with the EELS measurements. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Stephen Foiles of Sandia National Laboratories for valuable feedback on the MD simulations. Analytical TEM and atomistic simulations were conducted at the Center for Functional Nanomaterials, Brookhaven National Laboratory, which is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-SC0012704. Sandia National Laboratories is a multiprogram laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the US Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason R. Trelewicz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Donaldson, O.K., Wang, W., Hattar, K. et al. Impurity stabilization of nanocrystalline grains in pulsed laser deposited tantalum. Journal of Materials Research 32, 1351–1360 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2017.68

Download citation