U–Mo metallic alloy is considered as an advanced fast reactor and research reactor fuel material. U–33 at.% Mo has a higher melting point than that of pure uranium metal. This provides a higher safety margin against fuel melting and diminishes fuel and clad interaction. The metallic fuels are fabricated through a melting-casting route, and the cast microstructure of U–33 at.% Mo has been characterized using optical microscope, scanning electron microscopy—energy dispersive spectroscopy, and Electron back scattered diffraction. These microstructures show dendrites of two different morphologies: (i) the γ-(U) dendrite with secondary branches and (ii) the equiaxed (Mo) dendrite without secondary branches and surrounded by a peritectic reaction product. In this article, for the first time, a phase field model has been developed for U–Mo alloys to understand the morphological evolution and the associated microsegregation of γ-(U) dendrites in the U–33 at.% Mo alloy. The evolution of the concentration and temperature field with the time and the effect of undercooling on the growth velocity of γ-(U) and (Mo) dendrites has been studied.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
M.K. Meyer, J. Gan, J.F. Jue, D.D. Keisar, E. Perez, A. Robinson, D.M. Wachs, N. Woolstenhulme, G.L. Hofman, and Y.S. Kim: Irradiation performance of U–Mo monolithic fuel. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 46 (2), 169 (2014).
R.D. Mariani, D.L. Porter, V.S. Blackwood, Z.S. Jones, D.L. Olson, B. Mishra, J.R. Kennedy, and S.L. Hayes: International Conference on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cyles: Safe Technologies and Sustainable Scenarios (FR13), Paris, France, 4–7 March (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2013). IAEA-CN–199/366; ISSN 0074–1884.
S. Chakraborty, G. Choudhuri, J. Banerjee, R. Agarwal, K.B. Khan, and A. Kumar: Micro-structural study and rietveld analysis of fast reactor fuels: U–Mo fuels. J. Nucl. Mater. 467, 618 (2015).
Y.I. Chang: Technical rationale for metal fuel in fast reactors. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 39 (3), 161 (2007).
R.D. Mariani, D.L. Porter, S.L. Hayes, and J.R. Kennedy: Metallic fuels: The EBR-II legacy and recent advances. Process Chem. 7, 513–520 (2012).
A. Landa, P. Soderlind, B. Grabowski, P.E.A. Turchi, A.V. Ruban, and L. Vitos: Ab Initio Study of Advanced Metallic Nuclear Fuels for Fast Breeder Reactors, MRS Spring Meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA, April 9–13 (2012); published in the MRS Proceedings on “Actinides—Basic Science, Applications, and Technology”, 14 pages (LLNL-CONF-552336).
X. Zhang, Y.F. Cui, G.L. Xu, W.J. Zhu, H.S. Liu, B.Y. Yin, and Z.P. Jin: Thermodynamic assessment of the U–Mo–Al system. J. Nucl. Mater. 402, 15 (2010).
T. Velikanova, A. Bodar, L. Artyukh, O. Bilous, S. Firstov, and D. Miracle: Titanium-boride composites: Influence of alloying on constitution and properties of titanium–boride eutectic alloys. In Metallic Materials with High Structural Efficiency, O.N. Senkov, D.B. Miracle, and S.A. Fristov, eds. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands 2004); p. 260.
P. Schaffnit, C. Stallybrass, J. Konrad, F. Stein, and M. Weinberg: A Scheil–Gulliver model dedicated to the solidification of steel. Calphad 48, 184 (2015).
E.J. Lavernia and T.S. Srivatsan: The rapid solidification processing of materials: Science, principles, technology, advances, and applications. J. Mater. Sci. 45, 287 (2010).
M. Schwarz, C.B. Arnold, M.J. Aziz, and D.M. Herlach: Dendritic growth velocity and diffusive speed in solidification undercooled dilute Ni–Zr melts. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 226–228, 420 (1997).
G.B. McFadden, A.A. Wheeler, R.J. Braun, S.R. Coriell, and R.F. Sekerka: Phase-field models for anisotropic interfaces. Phys. Rev. E 48 (3), 2016 (1993).
A.A. Wheeler, B.T. Murry, and R.J. Schaefer: Computation of dendrites using a phase field model. Phys. D 66, 243 (1993).
A.A. Wheeler, W.J. Boettinger, and G.B. McFaden: Phase-field model of solute trapping during solidification. Phys. Rev. E 47 (3), 1893 (1993).
S.L. Wang, R.F. Sekerka, A.A. Wheeler, B.T. Murry, S.R. Coriell, R.J. Braun, and G.B. McFaden: Thermodynamically-consistent phase field models for solidification. Phys. D 69, 189 (1993).
W.J. Boettinger, A.A. Wheeler, B.T. Murry, and G.B. McFadden: Prediction of solute trapping at high solidification rates using a diffuse interface phase-field theory of alloy solidification. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 178, 217 (1994).
W.J. Boettinger and J.A. Warren: The phase field method: Simulation of alloy dendritic solidification during recalescence. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 27, 657 (1996).
A.T. Dinsdale: SGTE data for pure elements. Calphad 15, 317 (1991).
Thermophysical Properties of Materials for Nuclear Engineering: A tutorial and collection of data, Chapter: Metallic fuel, Uranium, P.L. Kirikov, ed. (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2006); p. 15.
Determining the thermophysical properties of molybdenum, by NETZSCH-Geratebau GmbH, 26th June 2013, on internet site, Available at: www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=9384 (accessed November 12, 2016).
Chemical engineering division research highlights: May 1962-April 1963, ANL-6766, Research reports, 38.
S.J. Rothman: Diffusion in Uranium, Its Alloys and Compounds, 1961, ANL-5700, part C.
V. Palinov, A.I. Nakonechnikov, and V.N. Bykov: Diffusion of uranium in molybdenum, niobium, zirconium and titanium. At. Energ. 19 (6), 521 (1965).
K. Huang, D.D. Keiser, Jr., and Y. Sohn: Interdiffusion intrinsic diffusion, atomic mobility, and vacancy wind effect in c(bcc) uranium–molybdenum alloy. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 44, 738 (2013).
J. Askill and D.H. Tomlin: Self-diffusion in molybdenum. Philos. Mag. 8 (90), 997 (1963).
S. Loginova and H.M. Singer: The phase field technique for modeling multiphase materials. Rep. Prog. Phys. 71, 106501 (2008).
J.J. Hoyt, M. Asta, and A. Karma: Atomistic and continuum modeling of dendritic solidification. Mater. Sci. Eng., R 41, 121 (2003).
J.J. Hoyt, M. Asta, and A. Karma: Atomistic simulation methods for computing the kinetic coefficient in solid-liquid systems. Interface Sci. 10, 181 (2002).
S.R. Coriell and D. Turnbull: Relative roles of heat transport and interface rearrangement rates in the rapid growth of crystals in undercooled melts. Acta Metall. 30, 2135 (1982).
B. Vinet, L. Magnusson, H. Fredriksson, and P.J. Desre: Correlations between surface and interface energies with respect to crystal nucleation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 255 (4), 363 (2002).
M.E. Glicksman, J.S. Lowengrub, and S. Li: Non-monotone temperature boundary conditions in dendritic growth. In Modelling of Casting, Welding and Advanced Solidification Processing XI, Available at: www.math.uci.edu/∼lowengrb/RESEARCH/publications/MCWASP_XI_8MEG.pdf (accessed December 3, 2016).
M.E. Glicksman: Mechanism of dendritic branching. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 43, 391 (2012).
A.M. Mullis: Deterministic side-branching during thermal dendritic growth. Mater. Sci. Eng. 84, 012071 (2015).
W. Mullins and R. Sekerka: Stability of a planar interface during solidification of a dilute binary alloy. J. Appl. Phys. 35, 444 (1964).
About this article
Cite this article
Chakraborty, S., Choudhuri, G., Somayajulu, P.S. et al. Microstructure characterization and phase field analysis of dendritic crystal growth of γ-U and BCC-Mo dendrite in U–33 at.% Mo fast reactor fuel. Journal of Materials Research 33, 225–238 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2017.425