The alloy variation of the band gap and the electron and hole effective masses have been calculated for HgCdTe and HgZnTe. Band-gap bowing is larger in HgZnTe than in HgCdTe because of the larger bond length mismatch of HgTe and ZnTe; electron and hole effective masses are found to be comparable for the two alloys for a given band gap. We have calculated the electron mobility in both alloys with contributions from phonon, impurity, and alloy scattering. Contributions to the E1 line width due to alloy and impurity scattering in Hg0.7Cd0.3Te have been calculated. Results of calculations of the vacancy formation energies in HgTe, ZnTe, and CdTe are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
J. L. Shay and J. H. Wernick, “Ternary chalcopyrite semiconductors, growth, electronic properties and applications” (Pergamon Press, NY, 1975).
R. S. Peigelson and R. K. Route, J. Crystal Growth 49 p. 261, (1980).
N. B. Singh, R. H. Hopkins, R. Mazelsky, W.Gaida, D. H. Lemmon, J. D. Feichtner and R. Mazelsky, Mater. Letter 4 p. 21 (1985).
M. Gottlieb, T. J. Isaacs, J. D. Feichtner and G. W. Roland, J. Appl. Physics 45 p. 5145 (1974).
N. B. Singh, R.H. Hopkins and R. Mazelsky, J. Crystal Growth (to be communicated).
N. B. Singh, T. Gould and R. H. Hopkins, J. Crystal Growth 78 p. 43 (1986).
I. Fritz, T. J. Isaacs, M. Gottlieb, and B. Morosin, Solid State Communications 27 p. 535 (1978).
About this article
Cite this article
Berding, M.A., Chen, AB. & Sher, A. HgCdTe Versus Hgznte: Electronic Properties and Vacancy Formation Energies. MRS Online Proceedings Library 90, 127 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-90-127