Restricted Hydration of Mass-Cured Concrete Containing Fly Ash

Abstract

Cement paste and concrete specimens containing three different mixtures of portland cement (PC) and high-lime fly ash (FA) were subjected to various curing conditions, and the strengths, non-evaporable water, and porosities were compared with control mixes containing portland cement only. Strength and porosity data indicated that the cementing action of the mixtures was, in all cases, inferior to portland cement. For each mixture the strength loss resulting from imperfect curing, i.e. sealed or exposed to 50% relative humidity, was greater than for portland cement. In the case of concrete drying from one surface, strength differences were found, but these were not as clearly defined as those obtained in the paste specimens.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    ACI Committee 308–81, Standard Practice for Curing Concrete (ACI, Detroit, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    R.H. Mills, in Blended Cements, STP 897, edited by G. Frohnsdorff ASTM Special Technical Publication 897 (ASTM, Philadelphia, 1986) pp. 49–61.

  3. 3.

    R. Shalon and D. Ravina, in International Symposium on Concrete and Reinforced Concrete in Hot Countries, Haifa (RILEM, 1960).

  4. 4.

    R.H. Mills, in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-Products: Characterization, Utilization and Disposal II, edited by G.J. McCarthy, F.P. Glasser and D.M. Roy, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 65, (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1986) pp. 207–217.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. H. Mills.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mills, R.H., Buenfeld, N. Restricted Hydration of Mass-Cured Concrete Containing Fly Ash. MRS Online Proceedings Library 86, 221 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-86-221

Download citation