Abstract
There is a need for microminiaturized cell-culture environments, i.e., NanoLiter BioReactors (NBRs), for growing and maintaining populations of up to several hundred cultured mammalian cells in volumes three orders of magnitude smaller than those contained in standard multi-well screening plates. Reduced NBR volumes would not only shorten the time required for diffusive mixing, for achieving thermal equilibrium, and for cells to grow to confluence, but also simplify accurate cell counting, minimize required volumes of expensive analytical pharmaceuticals or toxins, and allow for thousands of culture chambers on a single instrumented chip. These devices would enable the development of a new class of miniature, automated cell- based bioanalysis arrays for monitoring the immediate environment of multiple cell lines and assessing the effects of drug or toxin exposure. The challenge, beyond that of optimizing the NBR physically, is to detect cellular response, provide appropriate control signals, and, eventually, facilitate closed-loop adjustments of the environment–e.g., to control temperature, pH, ionic concentration, etc., to maintain homeostasis, or to apply drugs or toxins followed by the adaptive administration of a selective toxin antidote. To characterize in a nonspecific manner the metabolic activity of cells, the biosensor elements of the NBR might include planar pH, dissolved oxygen, and redox potential sensors, or even an isothermal picocalorimeter (pC) to monitor thermodynamic response. Equipped with such sensors, the NBR could be used to perform short- and long-term cultivation of several mammalian cell lines in a perfused system, and to monitor their response to analytes in a massively parallel format. This approach will enable automated, parallel, and multiphasic monitoring of multiple cell lines for drug and toxicology screening. An added bonus is the possibility of studying cell populations with low cell counts whose constituents are completely detached from typical tissue environment, or populations in controlled physical and chemical gradients.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
- 1.
K. Slater, Cytotoxicity tests for high-throughput drug discovery, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 12, 70 (2001).
- 2.
A. Prokop, Systems analysis and synthesis in biology and biotechnology, Int. J. Gen. Syst. 8, 1 (1982).
- 3.
H. Becker and C. Gartner, Polymer based micro-reactors, Revs. Molec. Biotechnol. 82, 89 (2001).
- 4.
K. Efimenko, W.E. Wallace and J. Genzer, Surface modification of Sylgard-184 Poly (dimethyl siloxane) networks by ultraviolet and ultraviolet/ozone treatment, J. Coll. Interface Sci. 254, 306 (2002).
- 5.
T.C. Mekel, V.I. Bondar, K. Nagai, B.D. Freeman and I. Pinnau, Gas sorption, diffusion, and permeation in poly(dimethylsiloxane), J. Polymer Sci., Polymer Phys. B 38, 415 (2000).
- 6.
M.J. Powers, K. Domansky, M.R. Kaazempur-Mofrad, A. Kalezi, A. Capitano, A. Upadhyaya, P. Kurzawski, K.E. Wack, D.B. Stolz, R. Kamm and L.G. Griffith, A microfabricated array bioreactor for perfused 3D liver culture, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 78, 257 (2002).
- 7.
W.R. Tolbert, Ferfusion culture systems for production of mammalian cell biomolecules, in: Large Scale Mammalian Culture, J. Feder and W.R. Tolbert, eds. (Academic Press, New York, 1985) p. 97.
- 9.
M.W. Konrad, B. Storrie, D.A. Glaser and L.H. Thompson, Clonal variation in colony morphology and growth of CHO cells cultured on agar, Cell 10, 305 (1977).
- 8.
G. Michalopoulos, H.D. Cianciulli, A.R. Novotny, A.D. Kligerman, S.C. Strom and R.L. Jirtle, Liver regeneration studies with rat hepatocytes in primary culture, Cancer Res. 42, 4673 (1982).
- 10.
T.G. van Kooten, J.F. Whitesides and A.F. von Recum, Influence of silicone (PDMS) surface texture on human skin fibroblast proliferation as determined by cell cycle analysis, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. (Appl. Biomat.) 43, 1 (1998).
- 11.
A. Prokop and R.K. Bajpai, The sensitivity of biocatalysts to hydrodynamic shear stress, in Advances in Applied Microbiology, A. Laskin, ed. (Academic Press, New York, 1992) vol. 37, p. 165.
- 12.
P.A. Parsons-Wingerter and W.M. Saltzman, Growth versus function in the three-dimensional culture of single and aggregated hepatocytes within collagen gels, Biotechnol.Progr. 9, 600 (1993).
- 13.
J. Voldman, M.L. Gray and M.A. Schmidt, Microfabrication in biology and medicine, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 1, 401 (1999).
- 14.
T.J. Zieziulewicz, D.W. Unfricht, N. Hadjout, M.A. Lynes and D.A. Lawrence, Shrinking the biologic world–Nanobiotechnologies for toxicology, Toxicol. Sci. 74, 235 (2003).
- 15.
A. Ghanem and M.L. Shuler, Characterization of a perfusion reactor utilizing mammalian cells on microcarrier beads, Biotechnol. Progr. 16, 471 (2000).
- 16.
K. Viravaiya and M.L. Shuller, Incorporation of 3T3-L1 cells to mimic bioaccumulation in a microscale cell culture analog device for toxicity studies, Progr. Biotechnol. xx, xx (2004).
- 17.
A. Sin, K.C. Chin, M.H. Jamil, Y. Kostov, G. Rao and M.L. Shuller, The design and fabrication of three-chamber microscale cell culture devices with integrated dissolved oxygen sensors, Biotechnol. Progr. 20, 338 (2004).
- 18.
Y. Yang and R.R. Balcarcel, Determination of carbon dioxide production rates for mammalian cells in 24-well plates, BioTechniques 36, 286 (2004).
- 19.
R.R. Balcarcel and L.M. Clark, Metabolic screening of mammalian cell cultures using well-plates, Biotechnol. Prog. 19, 98 (2003).
- 20.
J.W. Allen and S.N. Ghatia, Formation of steady-state oxygen gradients in vitro, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 82, 253 (2003).
- 21.
M.H. Maharbiz, W.J. Holtz, R.T. Howe and J.D. Keasling, Microbioreactor arrays with parametric control for hig-throughput experimentation, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 85, 376 (2004).
- 22.
F. Hafner, Cytosensor microphysiometer: technology and recent applications, Biosensors Bioelectr. 15, 149 (2000).
- 23.
S.E. Eklund, D. Taylor, E. Kozlov, A. Prokop and D.E. Cliffel, A microphysiometer for simultaneous measurement of changes in extracellular glucose, lactate, oxygen, and acidification rate, Anal. Chem. 76, 519 (2004).
- 24.
S. Hediger, A. Sayah, J.D. Horisberger and M.A.M. Hijs, Modular microsystem for epithelial cell culture and electrical characterization, Biosensors Bioelectr. 16, 689 (2001).
- 25.
K.F. Weibezahn, G. Knedlitschek, H. Dertinger, W. Bier, Th. Schller and K. Schubert, Reconstruction of tissue layers in mechanically processed microstructures, J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 14 (Suppl 1), S41 (1995).
- 26.
A.R. Wheeler, W.R. Throndset, R.J. Whelan, A.M. Leach, R.N. Zare, Y.-H. Liao, K. Farrell, I.D. Manger and A. Daridon, Microfluidic device for single-cell analysis, Anal. Chem. 75, 3249 (2003).
- 27.
E.W.H. Jager, C. Immerstrand, K.H. Peterson, J.-E. Magnusson, I. Lundstrom and O. Inganas, The cell clinic: Closable microvials for single cell studies, Biomed. Microdev. 4, 177 (2002).
- 28.
E. Leclerc, Y. Sakai and T. Fujii, Cell culture in 3-dimensional microfluidic structure of PDMS (polydimethylsiloxane), Biomed. Microdev. 5, 109 (2002).
- 29.
W.J. Chang, D. Akin, M. Sedlak, M.R. Ladisch and R. Bashir, Poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) and silicon hybrid biochip for bacterial culture, Biomed. Microdev. 6, 281 (2003).
- 30.
M. Brischwein, E.R. Motrescu, E. Cabala, A.M. Otto, H. Grothe and B. Wolf, Functional cellular assays with multiparametric silicon sensor, Lab Chip 3, 234 (2003).
- 31.
A. Grodrian, J. Metze, Th. Henkel, M. Roth and J.M. Kohler, Segmented flow generation by chip reactors for highly parallelized cell cultivation, in: Biomedical Applications of Micro- and Nanoengineering, D.V. Nicolau and A.P. Lee, eds., Proc. SPIE 4937, 174 (2002).
- 32.
E.A. Johannessen, J.M. Weaver, L. Bourova, P. Svoboda, P.H. Gobbold and J.M. Cooper, Micromachined nanocalorimetric sensor for ultra-low-volume cell-based assays, Analyt. Chem. 74, 2190 (2002).
- 33.
J.T. Borenstein, H. Terai, K.R. King, E.J. Weinberg, M.R. Kaazempur-Mofrad and J.P. Vacanti, Microfabrication technology for vascularized tissue engineering, Biomed. Microdev. 4, 167 (2002).
- 34.
W.-H. Huang, W. Chang, Z. Zhang, D.-W. Pang, Z.-L. Wang, J.K. Cheng and D.-F. Cui, Transport, location, and quantal release monitoring of single cells on a microfluidic device, Anal. Chem. 76, 483 (2004).
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a National Institutes of Health grant 5 R43 RR016124-02 to NanoDelivery, Inc. Silicon wafers were kindly provided by Bridget Rogers of Chemical Engineering Department.
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prokop, A., Prokop, Z., Schaffer, D. et al. NanoLiterBioReactor: Monitoring of Long-Term Mammalian Cell Physiology at Nanofabricated Scale. MRS Online Proceedings Library 823, W9.5/O5.5 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-823-W9.5/O5.5
Published: