The Role of Ion Mass on End-of-Range Damage in Shallow Preamorphizing Silicon

Abstract

Preamorphization is commonly used to form shallow junction in silicon CMOS devices. The purposeof this experiment was to study the effect of the preamorphizing species’ mass on the interstitial concentration at the end-of-range (EOR). Isovalent species of Si, Ge, Sn and Pb were compared. Silicon wafers with a buried boron marker layer (4700 Å deep) were amorphized using implants of 22 keV 28Si+, 32 keV 73Ge+, 40 keV 119Sn+ or 45 keV 207Pb+, which resulted in similar amorphous layer depths. All species were implanted at a dose of 5×1014 /cm2. Cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (XTEM) was used tomeasure amorphous layer depths (approximately 400 Å). Post-implantation anneals were performed at 750 °C for 15 minutes. Plan-view transmission electron microscopy (PTEM) was used to observe and quantify the EOR defect population upon annealing. Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) was used to monitor the transient enhanced diffusion (TED) of the buried boron marker layer resulting from the EOR damage introduced by the amorphizing implants. Based upon the SIMS results Florida Object Oriented Process Simulator (FLOOPS) calculated the resulting time average diffusivity enhancements. Results showed that increasing the ion mass over a significant range (28 to 207 AMU) not only affects the quantity and type of damage that occurs at the EOR, but results in a reduced diffusivity enhancement.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    SIA, “International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors,” Semiconductor Industry Assoc., San Jose, CA 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    T. M. Liu and W. G. Oldham, “Channeling Effect of Low Energy Boron Implant in (100) Silicon,” IEEE Electron Device Lett., vol. EDL-4, pp. 59–62, 1983.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    R. B. Simonton, “The Use of Self-implanted Amorphized Silicon Substrates to Eliminate Channeling Effects in Low Energy Boron Implants,” Nucl. Inst. and Methods in Phys. Res. B, vol. 21, pp. 490–492, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    M. Delfino, D. k. Sadana, and A. E. Morgan, “Shallow Junction Formation by Preamorphization with Tin Implantation,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 49, pp. 575–577, 1986.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    S. N. Hong, G. A. Ruggles, J. J. Wortman, and M. C. Ozturk, “Material and Electrical Properties of Ultra-Shallow p+-n Junctions formed by Low-Energy Ion Implantation and Rapid Thermal Annealing,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 38, pp. 476–486, 1991.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    D. Eaglesham, P. Stolk, J.-Y. Cheng, H.-J. Gossmann, T. Haynes, and J. Poate, “{311} Defects in Ion-implanted Si: the cause of Transient Diffusion and a Mechanism for Dislocated Formation,” presented at Microsc. Semicond. Mater. Conf., Oxford, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    A. Claverie, L. Laanab, C. Bonafos, and C. Bergaud, “On the Relation Between Dopant Anomalous Diffusion in Si and End-of-Range Defects,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, vol. 96, pp. 202–209, 1995.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    K. S. Jones, L. H. Zhang, V. Krishnamoorthy, M. Law, D. S. Simmons, P. Chi, L. Rubin, and R. G. Elliman, “Diffusion of Ion Implanted Boron in Preamorphized Silicon,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 68, pp. 2672–2674, 1996.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    M. Y. Tsai and B. G. Streetman, “Recrystallization of Implanted Amorphous Silicon Layers. I. Electrical Properties of Silicon Implanted with BF2+ or Si+ + B+,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 50, pp. 183–187, 1979.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    A. C. Ajmera and G. A. Rozgonyi, “Elimination of End-of-Range and Mask Edge Lateral Damage in Ge+ Preamorphized, B+ Implanted Si,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 49, pp. 1269–1271, 1986.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    H. S. Chao, S. W. Crowder, P. B. Griffin, and J. D. Plummer, “Species and Dose Dependence of Ion Implantation Damage Induced Transient Enhanced Diffusion,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 79, pp. 2352–2363, 1996.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    H.-J. Gossmann, G. H. Gilmer, C. S. Rafferty, F. C. Unterwald, T. Boone, and J. M. Poate, “Determination of Si Self-interstitial Diffusivities fro the Oxidation-enhanced Diffusion in B Doping-superlattices: The Influence of the Marker Layer,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 77, pp. 1948–1951, 1995.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    J. F. Ziegler, J. P. Biersack, and U. Littmark, The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids.New York: Pergamon Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    S. Bharatan, “Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM),” in Material and Process Characterization of Ion Implantation, M. I. Current and C. B. Yarling, Eds.: Ion Beam Press, 1997, pp. 224–243.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    M. E. Law, G. H. Gilmer, and M. Jaraiz, “Simulation of Defects and Diffusion Phenomena in Silicon,” in MRS Bulletin, 2000, pp. 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    R. W. Olesinski and G. J. Abbaschian, “The Si-Pb Binary,” Metal Progress, pp. 55,57, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    P. A. Packan and J. D. Plummer, “Transient Diffusion of Low-concentration B Due to 29Si Implantation Damage,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 56, pp. 1787–1789, 1990.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark H. Clark.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clark, M.H., Jones, K.S., Haynes, T.E. et al. The Role of Ion Mass on End-of-Range Damage in Shallow Preamorphizing Silicon. MRS Online Proceedings Library 669, 36 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-669-J3.6

Download citation