Skip to main content
Log in

Ab-Initio Study of the Local Bonding at Metal-Ceramic Heterophase Boundaries

  • Published:
MRS Online Proceedings Library Aims and scope

Abstract

The adhesion geometries of the (100) heterophase boundaries between the metals Al or Ag and spinel (MgAl2O4) were determined by density-functional calculations employing a mixed-basis pseudopotential method. The results compare well with high-resolution transmission-electronmicroscopy studies which were carried out in parallel. An analysis of the calculated electronic structures shows that the strong adhesion of Al on spinel is mediated by directional bonding. The comparatively weak interaction of spinel with Ag is dominated by polarization effects which can be classified as originating from an image-charge interaction. Additionally, the effects of changes in stoichiometry and of segregated substitutional atoms at the interface were analyzed in terms of the excess of the corresponding component at the interface. The implications for the geometric structure and the related mechanical properties at the metal-ceramic junctions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Schweinfest, F. Ernst, T. Wagner, and M Rifihle, J. Microsc., 194, 142, (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Köstlmeier, C. Elsässer, B. Meyer, and M. W. Finnis, phys. stat. sol. (a) 166 417 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Köstlmeier, C. Elsässer, B. Meyer, and M. W. Finnis, Mat. Res. Symp. Proc. Vol.492, 97 (1998); S. Köstlmeier and C. Elsässer, Interface Science, in press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Köstlmeier and C. Elsässer, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, in press.

  5. J. Bischof, D. Scherer, S. Herminghaus, and P. Leiderer, Phys. Rev. Lett 77, 1536 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. R. V. Kasowski, F. S. Ohnuchi, and R. H. French, Physica B 150, 44 (1988); K. Nath and A. B. Anderson, Phys. Rev. B 39, 1013 (1989); P. Alemany, R. S. Boorse, J. M. Burlitch, and R. Hoffmann, J. Phys. Chem 97, 8464 (1993); G. L. Zhao, J. R. Smith, J. Raynolds, and D. J. Srolovitz, Interface Science 3, 289 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Q. Guo and P. J. Møller, Surf. Sci. 244, 228 (1991); M. Gautier, L. Pham-Van and J. P.Durand, Europhys. Letters 18, 175 (1992); C. Scheu, G. Dehm, H. Müllejans, R. Brydson, and M.Rahle, Microsc. Microanal. Microstruct. 6, 19 (1995); G. Dehm, C. Scheu, G. Möbus, R. Brydson, and M. Ruhle, Ultramicroscopy 67, 207 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. P. J. Feibelman, J. A. Appelbaum, and D. R. Hamann, Phys. Rev. B 20, 1433 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964); W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. G. Louie, K.-M. Ho and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 19, 1774 (1979); C. Elsösser, N. Takeuchi, K. M. Ho, C. T. Chan, P. Braun and M. Föhnle, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2, 4371 (1990); K. M. Ho, C. Elsöser, C. T. Chan and M. Föhnle, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 4, 5189 (1992); B. Meyer, C. Elsösser and M. Föhnle, Fortran90 Program for Mixed-Basis Pseudopotential Calculations for Crystals (MPI für Metallforschung Stuttgart, unpublished).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 32, 8412 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Phys. Rev. B, 8, 5747, (1978).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Köstlmeier, S., Elsässer, C. Ab-Initio Study of the Local Bonding at Metal-Ceramic Heterophase Boundaries. MRS Online Proceedings Library 586, 43 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-586-43

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-586-43

Navigation