Application of Automated Image Analysis to the Study of Cement Paste Microstructure

Abstract

Digital acquisition and analysis of backscattered electron images provide powerful tools for the study of cement-based materials. The techniques can provide useful information on hydration phases, size distributions of unhydrated particles and voids, effects of changes in the watercementitious material ratio and the use of mineral admixtures, and the distribution of microcracks. The results of automated analyses of cement pastes with different water-cement ratios and pastes containing silica fume are presented. The analyses demonstrate that microstructural data vary significantly from image to image, requiring multiple images to limit the effects of scatter. The analyses also indicate that, although the pastes exhibit different degrees of hydration, the size distributions of the unhydrated cement particles are nearly identical. In contrast, the size distribution of larger voids differs significantly as a function of water-cementitious material ratio and with the use of silica fume as a partial replacement for cement. The calcium hydroxide content obtained based on image analysis exceeds but generally parallels that obtained with thermogravimetric analysis. The majority of microcracks in both nonloaded and loaded specimens occur through or adjacent to the lowest density hydration phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    K. L. Scrivener and P. C. Pratt in Proc., 6th Intl. Conf. on Cement Microscopy (Albuquerque, NM, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    K. L. Scrivener and E. M. Gartner in Bonding in Cementitious Composites, edited by S. Mindess and S. P. Shah (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 114, Pittsburgh, PA, 1988) pp. 77–85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    K. L. Scrivener in Pore Structure and Permeability of Cementitious Materials, edited by L. R. Roberts and J. P. Skalny (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 137, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989) pp. 129–140.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    H. Zhao and D. Darwin, Cem. Concr. Res. 22, (4), 695 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    D. Bonen and S. Diamond, Cem. Concr. Res. 22, (6), 1059 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    K. W. Ketcham, F. A. Romero, D. Darwin, S. Gong, M. N. Abou-Zeid, and J. L. Martin, SM Report No. 34, (University of Kansas Center for Res. 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    J. I. Goldstein, D. E. Newbury, P. Echlin, D. C. Joy, A. D. Romig, C. Fiori, and E. Lifshin, Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis, 2nd ed. (Plenum Press, New York and London, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    B. Ostle and L. C. Malone, Statistics in Research, 4th ed., (Iowa State University Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    D. Darwin, M. N. Abou-Zeid, K. W. Ketcham in Proc., 16th Intl Conf. on Cement Microscopy (Richmond, VA, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    L. Hjorth in Microsilica in Concrete 1, paper 9 (Aalborg Portland, Denmark, 1982).

  11. 11.

    G. W. Groves, Cem. Concr. Res. 11 (5/6), 713 (1981).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    K. H. Khayat and P. C. Aïtcin in Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag, and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete (Amer. Concr. Inst., SP-132, II, Detroit, MI, 1993) pp. 835–872.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Darwin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Darwin, D., Abou-Zeid, M.N. Application of Automated Image Analysis to the Study of Cement Paste Microstructure. MRS Online Proceedings Library 370, 3–12 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-370-3

Download citation