Effect of Substratum Morphology on Animal Cell Adhesion and Behavior

Abstract

Glass surfaces with well defined surface morphologies have been prepared using photolithography to study the effect of surface morphology on cell adhesion and function. Using a transformed recombinant cell-line, AtT-20, as a model of shear sensitive cell, we have shown that cell-substratum adhesion strength is enhanced using a surface with uniform grooves without any loss in cellular function. Furthermore, using primary hepatocytes as a model for a cell whose function is sensitive to its shape, we have shown that surface morphology can modulate cell shape as well as its function.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    J. Folkman and A. Moscona, Nature, 273, 345 (1978).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    D. E. Ingber, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87 3579 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    H. L. Hong and D. M. Brunette, J. Cell Sci., 87, 259 (1987).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    M. Iwig, D. Glaesser and M. Bethge, Exp. Cell Res., 131, 47 (1981).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    A. Ben-Ze’ev, J. Cell Sci. Suppl., 8, 293 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    J. Aikan, L. Cima, B. Schloo, D. Mooney, L. Johnson, R. Langer and J. Vacanti, J. Ped. Sur. 25, 140 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    W. Hertl, W. S. Ramsey and E. D. Nowlan, In Vitro, 2, 796 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    L. G. Cima, D. E. Ingber, J. P. Vacanti and R. Langer, Biot. Bioeng., 38 145 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    D. J. Mooney, R. Langer, J. P. Vacanti and D. E. Ingber, presented at the 1990 AIChE annual meeting, Chicago, I1, 1990 (unpublished).

  10. 10.

    B. Chehroudi, T. R. L. Gould, and D. M. Brunette, J. Biomed. Mat. Res., 24 1203 (1990)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    G. A. Dunn and A. F. Brown, J. Cell Sci., 83, 313 (1986).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    D. M. Brunette, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 3, 231 (1988). Surface Characterization of Biomaterials, edited by B.D. Ratner (Elsevier), p205.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    S. C. Wittelsberger, K. Kleene and S. Penman, Cell, 24, 859 (1981).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    A. Ben-Ze’ev, S. R. Farmer and S. Penman, Cell, 21, 365 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the laboratory of D. E. Ingber and J. Vacanti at the Children’s Hospital in Boston for help in the procurement of primary rat hepotocytes and M. J. Cima at the Material Science and Engineering Department at MIT and D. Mooney and D.E. Ingber at Children’s hospital for helpful discussions. The authors also wish to acknowledge financial support from the NSF Engineering Research Center Initiative: ECD 8803014. R. Singhvi wishes to acknowledge a fellowship from the Merck Manufacturing Division of Merck and Company.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singhvi, R., Stephanopoulos, G.N. & WANG, D.I.C. Effect of Substratum Morphology on Animal Cell Adhesion and Behavior. MRS Online Proceedings Library 252, 237–245 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-252-237

Download citation