Skip to main content
Log in

Thermokinetic Model of Borosilicate Glass Dissolution: Contextual Affinity

  • Published:
MRS Online Proceedings Library Aims and scope

Abstract

Short and long-term geochemical interactions of R7T7 nuclear glass with water at 100°C were simulated with the DISSOL thermokinetic computer code. Both the dissolved glass quantity and the resulting water composition, saturation states and mineral quantities produced were calculated as a function of time. The rate equation used in the simulation was first proposed by Aagaard and Hegelson: v = k+•S•a(H+)-n•(1–e-(A/RT)). It simulates a gradually diminishing dissolution rate as the reaction affinity diminishes. The best agreement with 1-year experimental data was obtained with a reaction affinity calculated from silica activity (Grambow’s hypothesis) rather than taking into account the activity of all the glass components as proposed by Jantzen and Plodinec. The concept of residual affinity was introduced by Grambow to express the fact that the glass dissolution rate does not cease. We prefer to replace the term “residual affinity” by “contextual affinity”, which expresses the influence on the dissolution rate of three factors: the solution chemistry, the metastability of SiO2(m), and the possible precipitation of certain aluminosilicates such as zeolites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Aagaard and H.C. Hegelson, Am. J. of Sci. 282, 237–285 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. H.C. Hegelson, W.M. Murphy and P. Aagaard, Geoch. Cosmoch. Acta, 48, 2405–2432 (1984).

  3. A.C. Lasaga, J. Geo. Res. 81B6, 4009–4025 (1984.

  4. B. Grambow, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII, (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc.) 44, 15–27 (1984).

  5. B. Grambow, SKB Technical Report 87–02 (1987).

  6. E. Vernaz, T. Advocat and J.L. Dussossoy, presented at the 4th International Symposium on Ceramics in Nuclear Waste Management (91st Am. Ceram. Soc. Meeting, 1989).

  7. B. Grambow and D.M. Strachan, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI, (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc.) 112, 713–724 (1988).

  8. L.R. Pederson, C.Q. Buckwalter, G.L. McVay, R. Riddle, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VI, (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc.) 15, 47–54 (1982).

  9. R. Haaker, J. Malow and P. Offermann. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII, (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc.) 44, 121–128 (1985).

  10. P. Van Iseghem and B. Grambow, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI, (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc.) 112, 631–639 (1988).

  11. N. Godon and E. Vernaz, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management (this volume) (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc.).

  12. A. Paul, J. Mat. Sci., 12, 2246–2268 (1977).

  13. C.M. Jantzen and M.J. Plodinec, J. Non Cry. Sol., 67, 207–223 (1984).

  14. S. Fillet, PhD Thesis: University of Montpellier, France (1987).

  15. B. Fritz, Sci. Geol. Mem., 65, (1981).

  16. Y. Tardy and B. Fritz, Clays Minerals, 16, 361–373 (1981).

  17. J.L. Crovisier, T. Advocat, J.C. Petit and B. Fritz, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XII, (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc.) 127, 57–64 (1989).

  18. W.L. Bourcier, K.G. Knauss and C.I. Merzbacher, presented at 4th International Symposium on Ceramics in Nuclear Waste Management (91st Am. Ceram. Soc. Meeting, 1989).

  19. H.C. Hegelson, J.M. Delany, H.W. Nesbitt and D.K. Bird, Am. J. Sci, 274, 1089–1198 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Advocat, T., Crovisier, J.L., Fritz, B. et al. Thermokinetic Model of Borosilicate Glass Dissolution: Contextual Affinity. MRS Online Proceedings Library 176, 241 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-176-241

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-176-241

Navigation