Role of Mesoporous TiO2 Surface States and Metal Oxide Treatment on Charge Transport of Dye Sensitized Solar Cells


Photovoltaic performance of dye sensitized solar cell (DSSC) was enhanced by 19 and 69 % compared to untreated DSSC by treating the nanoporous titanium dioxide (TiO2) by ultra thin Aluminum oxide (Al2O3) and Hafnium oxide (HfO2) grown by atomic layer deposition method. Activation energy of dark current, obtained from the temperature dependent current-voltage (I-V-T), of the untreated DSSC was 1.03 eV on the other hand the DSSCs with Al2O3 and HfO2 surface treatment showed 1.27 and 1.31 eV respectively. A significant change in the activation energy of dark current, over 0.24 eV for Al2O3 treatment and 0.28 eV in case of HfO2 treatment, suggest that density and activity of surface states on nanoporous TiO2 was suppressed by ALD grown metal oxides to result improved photovoltaic performance. Further the enhanced DSSC performance was confirmed by external quantum efficiency measurement in the wavelength range of 350-750 nm.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. [1]

    B. O’Regan, M. Gratzel, Nature 353, 737 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. [2]

    M. Durr, A. Schmid, M. Obermaier, S. Rosselli, A. Yasuda and G. Nelles, Nature Materials 4, 607 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. [3]

    J. R. Durrant and S. A. Haque, Nature Materials 4, 362 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. [4]

    M. Gratzel, C. R. Chimie 9, 578 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. [5]

    H. Nusbaumer, S. M. Zakeeruddin, J. E. Moser, and M. Gratzel, Chem. Eur. J. 9, 3756 (2003)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. [6]

    D. Cahen, G. Hodes, M. Gratzel, J. Franois Guillemoles, and I. Riess, J. Phys. Chem. B, 104, 2053 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. [7]

    S. Sakaguchi, H. Ueki, T. Kato, T. Kado, R. Shiratuchi, W. Takashima, K. Kaneto, S. Hayase, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 164, 117 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. [8]

    B. A. Gregg, F. Pichot, S. Ferrere, and C. L. Fields J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 1422 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. [9]

    V. Yong, S. Tiong Ho, and R. P. H. Chang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 143506 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. [10]

    M. Liberatore, L. Burtone, T. M. Brown, A. Reale, A. Di Carlo, F. Decker, S. Caramori, and C. A. Bignozzi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 173113 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. [11]

    A. Kay and M. Gratzel, Chem. Mater., 14, 2930 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. [12]

    14 E. Palomares, J. N. Clifford, S. A. Haque, T. Lutz and J. R. Durrant, Chem. Commun., 14, 1464 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. [13]

    P. M. Sommeling, B. C. O’Regan, R. R. Haswell, H. J. P. Smit, N. J. Bakker, J. J. T. Smits, J. M. Kroon, and J. A. M. van Roosmalen, J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 19191 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. [14]

    Y. Kim, B. J. Yoo, R. Vittal, Y. Lee, N.G. Park, K.J. Kim, Journal of Power Sources 175, 914 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. [15]

    F. Lenzmann, M. Nanu, O. Kijatkina, A. Belaidi, Thin Solid Films 451–452, 639 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. [16]

    M. Shanmugam, M. Farrokh Baroughi and D. Galipeau, Electronics Letters 45, 648 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. [17]

    Y. Noma, T. Kado, D. Ogata, Y. Hara and S. Hayase, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 47, 505 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariyappan Shanmugam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shanmugam, M., Bills, B. & Baroughi, M.F. Role of Mesoporous TiO2 Surface States and Metal Oxide Treatment on Charge Transport of Dye Sensitized Solar Cells. MRS Online Proceedings Library 1270, 1103 (2010).

Download citation