Tests of the Affinity Assumption in Phantomlike Elastomer Networks

Abstract

Phantomlike elastomer simulations do not always deform globally affinely in the way that classical theory predicts. Assuming that each crosslink will deform affinely with its topological neighbors gives much better results, and creates a way to isolate crosslinks with unpredictable deformation properties. The correlation of non-affinities and network properties depends on the constitutive model and boundary condition used. We always find a correlation between local density of crosslinks and degree of non-affinity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    A. L. Andrady, M. A. Llorente, and J. E. Mark, J. Chem. Phys. 73, 1439 (1980).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    A. L. Andrady, M. A. Llorente, and J. E. Mark, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 2282 (1980).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    J. Bastide and L. Leibler, Macromolecules 21, 2647 (1988).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    J. Bastide, L. Leibler, and J. Prost, Macromolecules 23, 1821 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    S. J. Benson, L. C. McInnes, J. Moré, T. Munson, and J. Sarich, http://www.mcs.anl.gov/tao.

  6. 6.

    A. F. Bower and J. H. Weiner. J. Chem. Phys. 120, 11948 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    R. Bruinsma and Y. Rabin, Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Phys., Plasmas, Fluids 49, 554 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    P. L. Chandran and V. H. Barocas, J. Biomech. Eng. 128, 259 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    A. A. Darinskii, A. Zarembo, and N. K. Balabaev, Macromol. Symp. 252, 101 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    B. A. DiDonna and T. C. Lubensky, Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Phys., Plasmas, Fluids 72, 06619 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    B. Erman and J. E. Mark, Structures and Properties of Rubberlike Networks. (Oxford University Press, New York, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    D. A. Head, A. J. Levine, and F. C. MacKintosh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 108102 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    H. M. James and E. Guth, J. Chem. Phys., 11, 455 (1943).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    M. A. Kennedy, A. J. Peacock, and L. Mandelkern, Macromolecules 27, (1994).

  15. 15.

    W. Kuhn and F. Grun, J. Polym. Sci. 1, 183 (1946).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    A. J. Levine, D. A. Head, and F. C. MacKintosh, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, S2079 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    D. Long and P. Sotta, in The IMA Vol. in Mathematics and its Applications: Modeling of Soft Matter, Vol. 141, edited by M-C. T. Calderer and E. M. Terentjev (Springer, New York, 2005), pp. 205–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    J. E. Mark, J. Phys. Chem. B 28, 1205 (2003).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    G. Marrucci, F. Greco, and G. Ianniruberto, J. Rheol.. 44, 845 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    P. R. Onck, T. Koeman, T. van Dillen, and E. van der Giessen, Phys. Rev. Lett, 95, 178102 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    A. Ramzi, A. Hakiki, J. Bastide, and F. Boue, Macromolecules 30, 2963 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    A. Ramzi, F. Zielinski, J. Bastide, and F. Boue, Macromolecules 28, 3570 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    C. Rouf, J. Bastide, J. M. Pujol, F. Schosseler, and J. P. Munch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 830 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    M. Rubinstein and R. Colby, Polymer Physics (Oxford University Press, ??, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    M. Rubinstein and S. Panyukov, Macromolecules 30, 8036 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    J. Sommer and S. Lay, Macromolecules 35, 9832 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    C. Svaneborg, G. S. Grest, and R. Everaers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 257801 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    S. Westermann, W. Pyckhout-Hintzen, D. Richter, E. Straube, S. Egelhaaf, and R. May, Macromolecules 34, 2186 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Misty Davies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davies, M., Lew, A. Tests of the Affinity Assumption in Phantomlike Elastomer Networks. MRS Online Proceedings Library 1190, 1138 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-1190-NN11-38

Download citation