Strain sensitivity in ion-implanted polymers

Abstract

Ion implantation process was used to fabricate ultra-thin conducting films in inert polymers and to tailor the surface electrical properties for strain gauge applications. To this aim, polycarbonate substrates were irradiated at room temperature with low energy Cu+ ions of 60 keV at 1 μA/cm2 and with doses ranging from 1×1016 to 1×1017 ions/cm2. XRD and TEM measurements on the nanocomposite surfaces demonstrated the spontaneous precipitation of Cu nanocrystals at 1×1016 ions/cm2 fluence. These nanocrystals were located at about 50 nm - 80 nm below the polymer surface in accordance with TRIM calculations. Optical absorption spectra exhibited a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) at 2 eV, in accordance with the formation of Cu nanoparticles. For doses of 5×1016 ions/cm2 the formation of a continuous nanocrystalline Cu subsurface film occurred and a well pronounced SPR peak was observed. Otherwise, for higher doses (1×1017 ions/cm2) a damaged and structurally disordered film was obtained and the SPR peak was smeared out. Electrical conductivity measurements clearly indicated a reduced electrical resistance for the samples implanted with a doses up to 5×1016 ions/cm2, whereas higher doses (1×1017 ions/cm2) resulted detrimental for the electrical properties, probably due to the radiation induced damage. The dependence of electrical resistance from surface load was evaluated during compression tests up to 3 MPa. A significant linear variation of the electrical resistance with the surface load was found and could be related to the changes in the spatial distribution of nanoparticles inside the copper film.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. [1]

    N. Kishimoto, M. Umeda, Y. Takeda, V.T. Gritsyna, T.J. Renk and M.O. Thompson, Vacuum 58, 60 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. [2]

    N. Umeda, V.V Bandourko, V.N. Vasilets, N. Kishimoto, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 206, 657 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. [3]

    H. Boldyrieva, N. Umeda, O.A. Plaksin, Y. Takeda and N. Kishimoto, Surf. Coat. Technol. 196, 373 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. [4]

    H. Boldyrieva, N. Kishimoto, N. Umeda, K. Kono, O.A. Plaksin and Y. Takeda, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 219–220, 953 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. [5]

    S. N. Abdullin, A. L. Stepanov, Y. N. Osin, R. I. Khaibullin and I. B. Khaibullin, Surf. Coat. Technol. 106, 214 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. [6]

    M. Ikeyama, Y. Hayakawa, M. Tazawa, S. Nakao, K. Saitoh, Y. Miyagawa and S. Miyagawa, Thin Solid Films 281–282, 529 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. [7]

    E.K. Williams, D. Ila, A. Darwish, D.B. Poker, S.S. Sarkisov, M.J. Curley, J.C. Wang, V.L. Svetchnikov and H.W. Zandbergen, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 148, 1074 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. [8]

    S. Bouffard, B. Gervais and C. Leroy, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 105, 1 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Di Girolamo Giovanni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giovanni, D.G., Massaro, M., Piscopiello, E. et al. Strain sensitivity in ion-implanted polymers. MRS Online Proceedings Library 1134, 813 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-1134-BB08-13

Download citation