The Use of Activated Slags as Immobilisation Matrices for ILW


Composite cements where large amounts of blast furnace slag (BFS) replace Portland cement are currently used for immobilisation of ILW. Hydration of BFS is activated by the small amount of OPC present but the amount of reaction that occurs is limited at ambient temperatures. Increasing the temperature increases the hydration of the BFS but large amounts still remain unreacted, leaving a porous matrix where the capillary pores remain filled with a highly alkaline solution. This solution causes corrosion of reactive metals giving rise to expansive reactions and hydrogen release, and it can destroy the structure of zeolites releasing the adsorbed species.

Apart from OPC, BFS hydration can be activated by other compounds such as hydroxides, sulphates, silicates, and calcium aluminate cements. The use of these alternatives gives rise to binders such as ettringite and strätlingite which have a different chemistry where the pore solution has a lower pH. Corrosion of metals does not readily occur in these binders. This may be due to the reduced pH but could also arise from the lack of pore water, as these binders bind more water in their structure so that it is not available for transport of ionic species. This extra water binding also has potential for immobilisation of sludges where high w/s ratios are necessitated by the need to transport the sludge.

This paper will review some of the alternative activators for slag hydration and present experimental results on several systems where slag has been activated with compounds other than OPC.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. 1

    J.P Gorce, and NB Milestone, Probing the Microstructure and Water Phases in Composite Cement Blends, Cem. Concr. Res. 37 (2007) 310–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    A Setiadi, NB Milestone, J Hill, and M Hayes, Corrosion of aluminium and magnesium in BFS composite cements, Adv. App. Ceram. 2006 105 (4) 191–196

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    NB Milestone, “Reactions in cement encapsulated nuclear wastes: need for toolbox of different cement types”, Adv. Appl. Ceram. 105 (1) 13–18, 2006

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Q Zhou, NB Milestone, and M Hayes, An alternative to Portland cement for waste immobilisation – the calcium sulfoaluminate cement system, J. Hazard. Mat. 136 (2006) 120–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    VD Glukhovsky, et al., Binder, US Patent 4410365, 1983

  6. 6

    CJ Shi, X Wu, and MS Tang, Research on alkali-activated cementitious systems in China: a review, Adv. Cem. Res., 5, (17), 1–7, (1993)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    DM Roy, and MR Silsbee, Alkali activated cementitious materials: an overview, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 1992, 245, pp. 153–164.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    M Moranville-Regourd in Lea’s Chemistry of Cement and Concrete pp 664–667. pub Elsevier 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Y Bai, NB Milestone, and C Yang, Sodium sulphate activated GGBS/PFA and its potential as a Nuclear Waste Immobilisation matrix, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 2005 932 759–766.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. B. Milestone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Milestone, N.B., Bai, Y., Yang, C.H. et al. The Use of Activated Slags as Immobilisation Matrices for ILW. MRS Online Proceedings Library 1107, 93 (2008).

Download citation