Excess plutonium not destined for burning as MOX or in Generation IV reactors is both a long-term waste management problem and a security threat. Immobilisation in mineral and ceramic-based waste forms for interim safe storage and eventual disposal is a widely proposed first step. The safest and most secure form of geological disposal for Pu yet suggested is in very deep boreholes and we propose here that the key to successful combination of these immobilisation and disposal concepts is the encapsulation of the waste form in small cylinders of recrystallized granite. The underlying science is discussed and the results of high pressure and temperature experiments on zircon, depleted UO2 and Ce-doped cubic zirconia enclosed in granitic melts are presented. The outcomes of these experiments demonstrate the viability of the proposed solution and that Pu could be successfully isolated from its environment for many millions of years.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
R.C. Ewing, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 96, 3432 (1999).
G.R. Lumpkin, Elements 2, 365 (2006).
I. Muller and W.J. Weber, Mat. Res. Soc. Bull. 26, 698 (2001).
I. Farnan, H. Cho and W.J. Weber, Nature 445, 190 (2007).
B.E. Burakov and E.B. Anderson, Crystalline ceramics developed for the immobilisation of actinide wastes in Russia, Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Environmental Management ICEM’01, Bruges, Belgium (2001).
W.J. Weber, R.C. Ewing, C.R.A. Catlow, T. Diaz de la Rubia, L.W. Hobbs, C. Kinoshita, H. Matzke, A.T. Motta, M. Nastasi, E.K.H. Salje, E.R. Vance and S.J. Zinkle, J. Mat. Res. 13, 1434 (1998)
W.J. Weber, R.C. Ewing and L.M. Wang, J. Mat. Res. 9, 588 (1994).
K.E. Sickafus, H. Matzke, T. Hartmann, K. Yasuda, J.A. Valdez, P. Chodak, M. Nastasi and R.A. Verrall, J. Nucl. Mat. 274, 66 (1999).
B.E. Burakov, M. Yagovkina, M. Zamoryanskaya, A.A. Kitsay, V.M. Garbuzov, E.B. Anderson and A.S. Pankov, Mat. Res. Symp. Proc. 807 (2004) pp213–217.
T. Geisler, B. Burakov, M. Yagovkina, V. Garbuzov, M. Zamoryanskaya, V. Zirlin and L. Nicolaeva, J. Nucl. Mat. 336, 22 (2005).
R.C. Ewing, Nature 445, 161 (2007).
R. Edwards, New Scientist 2586, 26 (2007).
F. Gibb, Imperial Engineer (Royal School of Mines, London) 3, 11 (2005).
F.G.F. Gibb, K.P. Travis, N.A. McTaggart, D. Burley and K.W. Hesketh, Nucl.Technology (in press).
M.I.T., The Future of Nuclear Power: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2003)
N. Chapman and F. Gibb, Radwaste Solutions 10 (4) 26–37 (2003).
CoRWM, Managing Our Radioactive Waste Safely: CoRWM’s Recommendations to Government, (Committee on Radioactive Waste management, London, 2006).
M.I.T., The Future of Geothermal Energy: Impact of Enhanced Geothermal Systems [EGS] on the United States in the 21st Century, (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2006)
F. Gibb, Geoscientist 16 (1), 14–16 (2006).
P.G. Attrill and F.G.F. Gibb, Lithos 67, 103 (2003).
B.W. Chappell and A.J.R. White, Pacific Geology 8, 173 (1974).
P.G. Attrill and F.G.F. Gibb, Lithos 67, 119 (2003).
P. Moller, S.M. Weise, E. Althaus, W. Bach, H.J. Behr, R. Borchardt, K. Brauer, J. Drescher, J. Erzinger, E. Faber, B.T. Hansen, E.E. Horn, E. Huenges, H. Kampf, W. Kessels, T. Kirsten, D. Landwehr, M. Lodemann, L. Machon, A. Pekdeger, H.U. Pielow, C. Reutel, K. Simon, J. Walther, F.H. Weinlich and M. Zimmer, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 18233 (1997).
About this article
Cite this article
Fergus, G.F.G., Kathleen, J.T. & Boris, E.B. Deep Borehole Disposal of Plutonium. MRS Online Proceedings Library 1107, 51 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-1107-51