Results from a One-Year Leach Test: Long-Term Use of MCC-L

Conclusions

The results of the 1-year leach test led to the following conclusions:

  • The MCC-lP Static Leach Test Method has been demonstrated to be useful for studies up to 1 year at temperatures up to 90°C.

  • Accurate measurements of leachant volume at the start and the end of the test are important.

  • PNL 76-68 glass appears to continue to alter, albeit at a significantly reduced rate, even though the solution concentrations of many elements are saturated or supersaturated with respect to alteration phases.

  • The original surface of the glass was still present after 1 year, evidence that the gel layer will slowly get thicker but dissolution will not occur, or will occur at extremely slow rates.

  • At 40°C, more than 1 year is required to reach saturation of some important elements. Even at 90°C, testing beyond 1 year is needed to define alteration rates and details of the leaching mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Materials Characterization Center (1981) Nuclear Waste Materials Handbook DOE/TIC-11400, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Materials Characterization Center (1981) Materials Characterization Center Test Methods — Preliminary Version, PNL-3990, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Strachan, D.M. and Barnes, B.O. (1981) The Leachability of Some Nuclear Waste Forms. PNL-SA-9118, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Jantzen, C.M., Clarke, D.R., Morgan, P.E.D. and Harker, A.B. (1982) The Leaching of Tailored Polyphase Nuclear Waste Ceramics: Microstructural and Phase Characterization. J. Amer. Cer. Soc., Vol. 65 pp. 292–300

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Campbell, J.H., Hoenig, C.L., Bazan, F., Ryerson, F.J. and Rozsa, R.B. (1981). Immobilization of Savannah River High-Level Wastes in SYNROC: Results from Performance Tests. UCRL-86753, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Stone, J.A. (1981) An Experimental Comparison of Alternative Solid Forms for Savannah River High-Level Wastes. DP-MS-81-102, Savannah River Laboratory, Aiken, SC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    ACS (1980) Guidelines for Data Acquisition and Data Quality Evaluation in Environmental Chemistry. ACS Committee on Environmental Improvement. Analytical Chem. 52, 2242–2249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Marshall, W.L. (1980) Amorphous Silica Solubilities-I. Behavior in Aqueous Sodium Nitrate Solutions; 25–300°C, 0–6 Molal. Geochemica et Cosmo-chemica Acta, 44, 907–913.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Iler, R.K. (1979) The Chemistry of Silica: Solubility, Polymerization, Colloid, and Surface Properties, and Biochemistry. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Fullam, H.T. (1981) Solubility Effects in Waste-Glass/Demineralized Water Systems. PNL-3614. Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Grambow, B.E.E. (1982) The Role of Metal Ion Solubility in the Leaching of Nuclear Waste Glasses. PNL-SA-10079. Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA (also this publication).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kester, D.R., O’Conner, T.P., and Byrne, R.H. Jr. (1975) Solution Chemistry, Solubility, and Adsorption Equilibria of Iron, Cobalt, and Copper in Marine Systems. Thalassia Jugoslavia, 11(2), 121–134.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. M. Strachan.

Additional information

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC06-76RLO 1830.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strachan, D.M. Results from a One-Year Leach Test: Long-Term Use of MCC-L. MRS Online Proceedings Library 11, 181 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-11-181

Download citation