Abstract
Reverse micelles (RMs) are aggregates in which nanoscale droplets of a polar liquid, usually water, are surrounded by a surfactant layer in a nonpolar continuous phase. They are widely used as media for reactions in which the extent of confinement or the presence of a surfactant interface play a central role. We have used molecular dynamics (MD) computer simulation and quasielastic neutron scattering (QENS) and to investigate the mobility of water molecules in reverse micelles. The contribution of water to the QENS signal is enhanced by deuterating the surfactant and the nonpolar phase. Our studies of water mobility have focused on the effects of water pool size, determined by the water/surfactant mole ratios w 0, as well as on the properties of the water-surfactant interface. Specifically, we have examined the effects of varying w 0 and of substituting other alkali ions for the usual Na+ counterion of the anionic surfactant AOT (bis (2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate)). We find good agreement between the QENS signal and its prediction from MD simulation. This allows us to obtain additional insight into water mobility by analyzing the MD self-intermediate scattering function (ISF) of water hydrogens in terms of contributions from molecular rotation and translation and from molecules in different interfacial layers. MD data indicate that the translational ISF decays nonexponentially due to lower water mobility close to the interface and to confinement-induced restrictions on the range of translational displacements. Rotational relaxation also exhibits nonexponential decay. However, rotational mobility of O-H bond vectors in the interfacial region remains fairly high due to the lower density of water-water hydrogen bonds in the vicinity of the interface.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
- 1.
M. P. Pileni, Journal of Physical Chemistry 97, 6961 (1993).
- 2.
P. L. Luisi and B. E. Straub, Reverse Micelles: Biological and Technological Relevance of Amphiphilic Structures in Apolar Media. (Plenum, New York, 1984).
- 3.
A. Amararene, M. Gindre, J. Y. LeHuerou, C. Nicot, W. Urbach, and M. Waks, J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 10751 (1997).
- 4.
P. Amico, M. D’Angelo, G. Onori, and A. Santucci, Nuovo Cimento 17, 1053 (1995).
- 5.
C. A. Boicelli, M. Giomini, and A. M. Giuliani, Appl. Spec. 38, 537 (1984).
- 6.
J. B. Brubach, A. Mermet, A. Filabozzi, A. Gerschel, D. Lairez, M. P. Krafft, and P. Roy, J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 430 (2001).
- 7.
M. D’Angelo, D. Fioretto, G. Onori, L. Palmieri, and A. Santucci, Phys. Rev. E 54, 993 (1996).
- 8.
D. S. Venables, K. Huang, and C. A. Schmuttenmaer, J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 9132 (2001).
- 9.
M. Bée, Quasielastic Neutron Scattering. (Hilger, Bristol, 1988).
- 10.
M. R. Harpham, B. M. Ladanyi, N. E. Levinger, and K. W. Herwig, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 7855 (2004).
- 11.
K. W. Herwig, W. D. Dozier, and J. S. Huang, Mater. Res. Using Cold Neutrons Pulsed Neutron Sources, [Proc.], 95 (1999).
- 12.
M. C. Bellissent-Funel, S. H. Chen, and J. M. Zanotti, Phys. Rev. E 51, 4558 (1995).
- 13.
M. C. Bellissent-Funel, J. Mol. Liq. 78, 19 (1998).
- 14.
J. M. Zanotti, M. C. Bellissent-Funel, and S. H. Chen, Phys. Rev. E: 59, 3084 (1999).
- 15.
V. Crupi, D. Majolino, P. Migliardo, and V. Venuti, J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 10884 (2002).
- 16.
V. Crupi, D. Majolino, P. Migliardo, and V. Venuti, Philos. Mag. B 82, 425 (2002).
- 17.
S. Mitra, R. Mukhopadhyay, K. T. Pillai, and V. N. Vaidya, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 235, 229 (1998).
- 18.
S. Mitra, R. Mukhopadhyay, K. T. Pillai, and V. N. Vaidya, Solid State Commun. 105, 719 (1998).
- 19.
S. Mitra, R. Mukhopadhyay, I. Tsukushi, and S. Ikeda, J. Phys.-Condens. Matter 13, 8455 (2001).
- 20.
T. Takamuku, M. Yamagami, H. Wakita, Y. Masuda, and T. Yamaguchi, J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 5730 (1997).
- 21.
S. Takahara, M. Nakano, S. Kittaka, Y. Kuroda, T. Mori, H. Hamano, and T. Yamaguchi, J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 5814 (1999).
- 22.
S. H. Chen, P. Gallo, and M. C. Bellissent-Funel, Can. J. Phys. 73, 703 (1995).
- 23.
A. Faraone, L. Liu, C. Y. Mou, P. C. Shih, J. R. D. Copley, and S. H. Chen, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 3963 (2003).
- 24.
F. Venturini, P. Gallo, M. A. Ricci, A. R. Bizzarri, and S. Cannistraro, Philos. Mag. B 82, 507 (2002).
- 25.
V. Venuti, V. Crupi, S. Magazu, D. Majolino, P. Migliardo, and M. C. Bellissent-Funel, J. Phys. IV 10, 211 (2000).
- 26.
J. Teixeira, Nuovo Cimento 16, 1433 (1994).
- 27.
P. Gallo, M. Rovere, and E. Spohr, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 11324 (2000).
- 28.
P. Gallo, Phys.l Chem. Chem. Phys. 2, 1607 (2000).
- 29.
P. Gallo, M. Rapinesi, and M. Rovere, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 369 (2002).
- 30.
P. Gallo, M. A. Ricci, and M. Rovere, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 342 (2002).
- 31.
M. Rovere, M. A. Ricci, D. Vellati, and F. Bruni, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 9859 (1998).
- 32.
S. H. Chen, P. Gallo, F. Sciortino, and P. Tartaglia, Phys. Rev. E 56, 4231 (1997).
- 33.
A. Faraone, L. Liu, and S. H. Chen, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 6302 (2003).
- 34.
H. F. Eicke and J. Rehak, Helv. Chim. Acta 59, 2883 (1976).
- 35.
M. R. Harpham, B. M. Ladanyi, and N. E. Levinger, J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 16891 (2005).
- 36.
D. Di Cola, A. Deriu, M. Sampoli, and A. Torcini, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 4223 (1996).
- 37.
P. A. Egelstaff, An Introduction to the Liquid State. (Academic, London, 1967).
- 38.
F. Volino and A. J. Dianoux, Mol. Phys. 41, 271 (1980).
- 39.
V. F. Sears, Can. J. Phys. 45, 237 (1967).
- 40.
J. Faeder and B. M. Ladanyi, J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 1033 (2000).
- 41.
C. Y. Lee, J. A. McCammon, and P. J. Rossky, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 4448 (1984).
- 42.
H. J. C. Berendsen, J. R. Grigera, and T. P. Straatsma, J. Phys. Chem. 91, 6269 (1987).
- 43.
K. J. Schweighofer, U. Essmann, and M. Berkowitz, J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 10775 (1997).
- 44.
L. X. Dang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 6954 (1995).
- 45.
J. Teixeira, M. C. Bellissent-Funel, S. H. Chen, and A. J. Dianoux, Phys. Rev. A 31, 1913 (1985).
- 46.
H. S. Tan, I. R. Piletic, and M. D. Fayer, J. Chem. Phys. 122 (2005).
- 47.
R. M. Lynden-Bell and W. A. Steele, J. Phys. Chem. 88, 6514 (1984).
- 48.
M. Tarek and D. J. Tobias, Biophys. J. 79, 3244 (2000).
- 49.
J. Faeder, M. V. Albert, and B. M. Ladanyi, Langmuir 19, 2514 (2003).
- 50.
S. Senapati and M. L. Berkowitz, J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9768 (2004).
- 51.
J. Eastoe, T. F. Towey, B. H. Robinson, J. Williams, and R. K. Heenan, J. Phys. Chem. 97, 1459 (1993).
- 52.
D. Fioretto, M. Freda, S. Mannaioli, G. Onori, and A. Santucci, J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 2631 (1999).
- 53.
D. Fioretto, M. Freda, G. Onori, and A. Santucci, J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 8216 (1999).
- 54.
R. E. Riter, E. P. Undiks, and N. E. Levinger, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 6062 (1998).
- 55.
D. Pant, R. E. Riter, and N. E. Levinger, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 9995 (1998).
Author information
Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ladanyi, B., Levinger, N. Water Mobility in Reverse Micelles Studied by Quasielastic Neutron Scattering and Molecular Dynamics Simulation. MRS Online Proceedings Library 899, 501 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-0899-N05-01
Published: