Abstract
The stress relaxation results below the glass-transition temperature Tg are a continuation of the viscoelastic relaxation above Tg. This means that the dynamic glass transition and not a secondary relaxation is the reason for the observed effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. Suh and R.H. Dauskardt, J. Mater. Res. 17, 1254 (2002).
E. Donth, The Glass Transition. Relaxation Dynamics in Liquids and Disordered Materials (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2001).
K. Schröter, G. Wilde, R. Willnecker, M. Weiss, K. Samwer, and E. Donth, Eur. Phys. J. B 5, 1 (1998).
G.P. Johari and M. Goldstein, J. Phys. Chem. 74, 2034 (1970).
G.P. Johari and M. Goldstein, J. Chem. Phys. 53, 2372 (1970).
G.P. Johari and M. Goldstein, J. Chem. Phys. 55, 4245 (1971).
M. Beiner, H. Huth, and K. Schröter, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 279, 126 (2001).
A.Q. Tool, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. 37, 73 (1946).
I.M. Hodge, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 169, 211 (1994).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schröter, K. Comments on “Mechanical relaxation time scales in a Zr-Ti-Ni-Cu-Be bulk metallic glass” by Daewoong Suh and Reinhold H. Dauskardt [J. Mater. Res. 17, 1254 (2002)]. Journal of Materials Research 18, 1998–1999 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2003.0277
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2003.0277